SUPER SOLDIERS
Rogan’s Up / Much love!!
Full video at www.unauthorized.tv
Also visit www.hugepianist.com
Live streams at dlive.com/OwenBenjaminComedy
This channel is also on YouTube at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9tX8703uwGyUv3EnRAwNiA
TO Watch this Video on BitCHUTE:CLICK HERE
spacer
ETYMOLOGY VACCINATION
vacca | Italian (ita) | (slang, figurative, derogatory) whore, slut. Cow. |
mucca | Italian (ita) | A milk-cow, milch cow. |
Variolation was the method of inoculation first used to immunize individuals against smallpox (Variola) with material taken from a patient or a recently variolated individual, in the hope that a mild, but protective, infection would result. The procedure was most commonly carried out by inserting/rubbing powdered smallpox scabs or fluid from pustules into superficial scratches made in the skin. The patient would develop pustules identical to those caused by naturally occurring smallpox, usually producing a less severe disease than naturally acquired smallpox. Eventually, after about two to four weeks, these symptoms would subside, indicating successful recovery and immunity. The method was first used in China, India and the Middle East before it was introduced into England and North America in the 1720s in the face of some opposition. The method is no longer used today. It was replaced by smallpox vaccine, a safer alternative. This in turn led to the development of the many vaccines now available against other diseases.
Terminology
The terminology used to describe the prevention of smallpox can cause confusion. In 18th-century medical terminology, inoculation refers to smallpox inoculation. Confusion is caused by writers who interchange variolation and vaccination through either mistranslation or misinterpretation. The term variolation refers solely to inoculation with smallpox virus and is not interchangeable with vaccination. The latter term was first used in 1800 soon after Edward Jenner introduced smallpox vaccine derived from cowpox, an animal disease distinct from smallpox. The term variolation was then used from the 19th century to avoid confusion with vaccination. Most modern writers tend to refer to smallpox inoculation as variolation throughout without regard for chronology, as is used here. Further confusion was caused when, in 1891, Louis Pasteur honoured Jenner by widening the terms vaccine/vaccination to refer to the artificial induction of immunity against any infectious disease. Inoculation is used synonymously with injection in connection with the use of vaccines or other biopharmaceuticals, but has other meanings in e.g. laboratory work.
Transition into vaccination
The success of variolation led many, including medical professionals, to overlook its drawbacks. Variolation was practiced on the basis that it protected against smallpox for life, and was far less likely to kill than natural infection. In some cases however, natural smallpox or variolation failed to protect from a second attack. These cases were a result of a lapse of immune “memory”, while others may have been misdiagnosed (experts often confused smallpox with chickenpox). Variolation also required a level of skill and attention to detail which some physicians lacked. Many physicians failed to take note of local redness and discharge to assure the variolation had taken, resulting in inadequate treatment. However, it was its great risk to others that led to the end of the practice. The collateral smallpox cases spread by variolated subjects shortly after variolation began to outweigh the benefits of the procedure. (THIS IS A CROCK, If you compared the risks of variolation compared to the chemical and technical vaccines of today and their nightmarish side effects, the arguments agains variolation are assinine!! Especially with today’s highly trained medical personnel being much more qualified to administer variolation. This is just a case of ‘Scientists” promoting their research.)
From the 1760s, a number of individuals, including John Fewster, Peter Plett, Benjamin Jesty, and particularly Edward Jenner, were interested in the use of material from cowpox, an animal infection, to protect against smallpox.[19][20] (Just who gave them the right to cross the human/animal disease barrier to treat a disease that was already curable by using our natural immune systems against the actual disease.?) In 1796, Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, did more vaccinations in 1798, and was the first to publish evidence that cowpox protected against smallpox, was safer than variolation, and that his vaccine could be maintained by arm-to-arm transfer. (what does that mean?)[21] The use of variolation soon began to decline as the smallpox vaccine became widely used and its benefits appreciated. Various countries made variolation illegal, starting with Russia in 1805.[11]:246
Variolation served as a natural precursor to the discovery of vaccination. The major differences between the two were that in vaccination, material from cowpox, an animal disease, was used, but particularly that it was safe to those vaccinated and was not transmitted to their contacts. Vaccination offered the public a less-harmful method of preventing smallpox. Vaccination would revolutionize the control of smallpox, leading to its eventual eradication.[11] The extension of the principle of vaccination by Pasteur and his successors would lead to the development of vaccines for diseases such as diphtheria, measles, mumps, rubella, and influenza, and make the eradication of infectious diseases, particularly poliomyelitis, a realistic prospect.
spacer
All Timelines Overview
The story of vaccines did not begin with the first vaccine–Edward Jenner’s use of material from cowpox pustules to provide protection against smallpox. Rather, it begins with the long history of infectious disease in humans, and in particular, with early uses of smallpox material to provide immunity to that disease.
Evidence exists that the Chinese employed smallpox inoculation (or variolation, as such use of smallpox material was called) as early as 1000 CE. It was practiced in Africa and Turkey as well, before it spread to Europe and the Americas.
Edward Jenner’s innovations, begun with his successful 1796 use of cowpox material to create immunity to smallpox, quickly made the practice widespread. His method underwent medical and technological changes over the next 200 years, and eventually resulted in the eradication of smallpox. (Not really, we sill have smallpox in the world today. And, why did they need to make “technological” changes to a method that was already extremely successful? And just what were those “technological changes?)
Louis Pasteur’s 1885 rabies vaccine was the next to make an impact on human disease. And then, at the dawn of bacteriology, developments rapidly followed. Antitoxins and vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, anthrax, cholera, plague, typhoid, tuberculosis, and more were developed through the 1930s. (All very successful before DNA was even discovered in 1869. Swiss researcher Friedrich Miescher, was originally trying to study the composition of lymphoid cells (white blood cells) and isolated a new molecule he called nuclein (DNA with associated proteins) from a cell nucleus. Source )
The middle of the 20th century was an active time for vaccine research and development. Methods for growing viruses in the laboratory led to rapid discoveries and innovations, including the creation of vaccines for polio. Researchers targeted other common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella, and vaccines for these diseases reduced the disease burden greatly. (The risk from these diseases was never that great and there already were vaccines for them.)
Innovative techniques now drive vaccine research, with recombinant DNA technology and new delivery techniques leading scientists in new directions. Disease targets have expanded, and some vaccine research is beginning to focus on non-infectious conditions such as addiction and allergies. (Funny how suddenly everyone has addictions and allergies.)
More than the science behind vaccines, these timelines cover cultural aspects of vaccination as well, from the early harassment of smallpox variolators (see the intimidation of a prominent minister described in the 1721 Boston Smallpox Epidemic entry) to the establishment of vaccination mandates, to the effect of war and social unrest on vaccine-preventable diseases. (again, isn’t if funny how war no is a permanent reality and more people than ever are refugees and immigrants?) Edward Jenner, Louis Pasteur, and Maurice Hilleman, pioneers in vaccine development receive particular attention as well. (Those early vaccines worked with the human body and were what could be seen as natural cures quite unlike the destructive, chemical and technical concoctions that fill our body with unnatural, invasive and unhealthy foreign particles and even micro-mini-computers designed to overrun not only our immune system but all of our bodily functions and organs.)
spacer
Science Diction is a bite-sized podcast about words—and the science stories behind them. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, and sign up for our newsletter.
spacer
Genetic Manipulation – THE OPEN MIND
https://www.thirteen.org/programs/the-open-mind/the-open-mind-genetic-manipulation/
Special | 27m 46s / Host: Richard D. Heffner
Guest: Thomas, Lewis Chancellor of the Cancer Institute and Dean of the Medical Schools at NYU and Yale University
Aired: 01/10/83 – 37 years ago. Don’t miss it. It is very important!
There are two ways to view this video:
1. click the link on the title “Genetic Manipulation” to view on njtvonline.org
2. click HERE to view on www.thirteen.org
.This video will likely be removed from the archives soon. If you find a way to make a copy of it, please let me know.
spacer
The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, F. William Engdahl
Published on February 10, 2014 by admin
F. William Engdahl is an American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher. “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” This lecture at the Open Mind Conference 2013, focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish its control over the very basis of human survival, the provision of our daily bread. Control the food and you control the people. This is no ordinary lecture about the perils of GMO. Engdahl takes the audience inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms and reveals a World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production. The lecture is based on Engdahls book “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” which is an eye-opener, a must-read for all those committed to the causes of social justice and World peace.
REPOSTED ON BITCHUTE
Engdahl carefully documents how the intellectual foundations of ‘eugenics,’ mass culling of the sick, coloured, and otherwise disposable races, were actually first established, and even legally approved, in the United States. Eugenics research was financially supported by the Rockefeller and other elite families and first tested on Jews under Nazi Germany.
NoneBorn in Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, Engdahl is the son of F. William Engdahl Sr., and Ruth Aalund (b. Rishoff). Engdahl grew up in Texas and earned a degree in engineering and jurisprudence from Princeton University in 1966 (BA) followed by graduate study in comparative economics at the University of Stockholm from 1969 to 1970. He then worked as an economist and freelance journalist in New York and in Europe.[
Talk given by F. William Engdahl during the 2013 Open Mind Convention (DK), regarding GMOs, Monsanto and the Rockefellers.Video was available on the Open Minds YouTube channel for the past 8 years but was scrubbed on July 27th, 2022.
pacer
After watching the above video you should have a really good understand of the fact the Genetic Manipulation and Modification was designed to take control of the human race…no to help us live longer healthier lives. An interesting item is discussed starting at 29:37. That is the TERMINATOR gene in the GMO food. The Terminator Gene causes the GMO seed to self destruct after one harvest. So, seed no longer can be stored and planted for the next year. You must buy more seed from Monsanto. Now, God created seed to reproduce after its kind indefinitely. He caused the plant to produce seed inside of the fruit for that very purpose. The reason for the Terminator Gene is total control of the population. If they control your food at the source, they control YOU.
What is even scarier, is that these mad scientists are not happy with just having total control of existing humans. They want TOTAL CONTROL of your existence, meaning, they decide who will be born, what genetic characteristics they will have and when they will die/if ever!!! In other words, THEY WANT TO BE GOD.
YOU had better be 100% certain of every aspect of anything that you put into your body. Now, we know that already you do not have total control of what goes into your body, because they have been allowed to keep secret what they have been putting in our food, water, and air. However, for that part over which you have control…be wise, be informed, be diligent. DO NOT TAKE ANYTHING AT FACE VALUE, AND DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING OR ANYONE YOU DO NOT KNOW!
spacer
This next video should blow your mind. They were already pretty far along with AI in 1961!!! It is a long video, from an even longer documentary. You really need to watch it. It will help you realize how much danger we are in and how they got to the point where they have created robots than not only look and act like humans, but they are predicting that robots will be able to give birth in the not so distant future… like soon.
‘Super soldiers’: The quest for the ultimate human killing machine
Guilt, tiredness, stress, shock – can specialised drugs help to mute the qualities that make soldiers human, asks Michael Hanlon?
The ancient Spartans believed that battlefield training began at birth. Those who failed the first round of selection, which took place at the ripe old age of 48 hours, were left at the foot of a mountain to die. The survivors would, in years to come, often wonder if these rejects were the lucky ones. Because to harden them up, putative Spartan warriors were subjected to a vigorous regime involving unending physical violence, severe cold, a lack of sleep and constant sexual abuse.
As with the English public schools, which used similar tactics to produce the warriors who carved out the British Empire, the Spartan regime worked; the alumni were the most feared soldiers in the eastern Mediterranean. And ever since then, military chiefs have wondered whether it may be possible to short-cut the long and demanding Spartan regime to produce a soldier who kills without care or remorse, shows no fear, can fight battle after battle without fatigue and generally behave more like a machine than a man.
(seriously??? So, this has been the mindset of every military since the Spartans? How were we not aware of that? That explains why our military personnel are treated so horribly, so monstrously abused, tortured, humiliated, abandoned, neglected and left to fend for themselves or starve. Had this been common knowledge, I doubt that anyone would voluntarily join the military. I know there is not a mother on earth that would allow their child to join, we would give everything to spare them. Gives me a new appreciation for the 70’s saying, “What if they gave a war and nobody came.”)
In the post-war era, the future of fighting was thought to be about tanks and missiles, large impersonal machines that would fight huge battles over the open terrain of Northern Europe. The soldiers would be pressing buttons in a command centre. But despite the advent of drone aircraft, much of 21st-century warfare is turning out to be a drawn-out, messy business, fought on a human scale in the mud and dust of Afghanistan. And fought against a mercurial army of irregulars who melt away into the fields and farms once the skirmish is over. Modern soldiers are not the cannon fodder of before. Highly trained and super fit, each one represents a huge investment by the nation that sends them into battle. A soldier who is too tired to fight effectively, who has gone mad or who is suffering from severe stress is like a broken-down tank, no use to anybody. What if soldiers could be made that did not break down?
The era of The Terminator, the perfect robotic killing machine, is decades away; to date, all efforts to create a humanoid robot that can climb the stairs, let alone fight the Taliban, have been risible. (so, that has been the focus of all the money, time, talent and effort of the military. Not solving world problems and ending the need for war. Building ROBOT Soldiers, who can kill more people, more effective, with no remorse.) But scientists are reporting breakthroughs with the next-best thing – the creation of human terminators, who feel less pain, less terror and less fatigue than “non-enhanced” soldiers and whose very bodies may be augmented by powerful machines.
Efforts to understand the brain of the soldier and put this knowledge to good use have been going on for some time. Professor Jonathan Moreno, a bioethicist at Pennsylvania State University, studies the way neuroscience is being co-opted by the military. “Right now, this is the fastest-growing area of science,” he says.
The Pentagon is currently spending $400m a year researching ways to “enhance” the human fighter. The defence giant Lockheed recently unveiled its “Hulc” (Human Universal Load Carrier), a science fiction-like, battery-powered exoskeleton that allows a human to lift 100kg weights and carry them at a fast run of 16kph (10mph). The videos of the Hulc in action are truly impressive. Superman strength is one thing, but soldiers still need to sleep. In Afghanistan the average soldier in combat gets only four hours’ rest a day and sleep deprivation is the single biggest factor in reducing fighting performance. Not only are tired soldiers less physically able to fight and run, they make more mistakes with the complex weapons systems at their disposal – mistakes that can prove deadly to themselves and their comrades.
Using chemistry to attack fatigue is, of course, nothing new. Two centuries ago, Prussian soldiers used cocaine to remain alert and Inca warriors used coca leaves to stay alert long before that. Since then, nicotine, amphetamines, caffeine and a new class of stimulants including the drug Modafinil have all been used successfully, to the extent that American soldiers can now operate normally even after 48 hours without sleep. Now the chemists are trying to tweak the molecular structure of this drug so that it will switch off the desire for sleep for even longer.
Tiredness is not the only psychological problem faced by soldiers. Combat is immensely stressful and although proper training means that men and women can remain focused while in mortal danger, it is afterwards that problems begin. During the Vietnam War, one in three soldiers was treated for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and in the Second World War a significant proportion of Allied conscripts never fired a shot in anger because of stress and fear before the battle had even begun. Up to now, PTSD has been treated by a mix of psychotherapy and antidepressants – effective techniques but expensive and time-consuming. But as with fatigue there may be a chemical shortcut for PTSD.
The trick is to erase unwanted memories, or at least take away their sting. Professor Roger Pitman, a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School in the US, has been experimenting with a drug called propranolol, a “beta blocker” normally used to treat high blood pressure, which he believes can erase the effects of terrifying memories.
Professor Pitman has given the drug to young volunteers who have suffered extreme trauma in, for example, road accidents. Those given placebos suffered nightmares, and remained fearful of the road. When exposed to recordings describing their accidents they suffered typical stress responses – sweating (ya, like IUDS and landmines), beating heart, dilated pupils. But those who had been on a course of propranolol showed no response at all. It was as though the trauma had not happened. (but our memories are very intricately connected with our development and who we are, this erasure of the memory can have dire consequences down the road due to the fact that those soldiers did experience the traumas which left body memories and more importantly, affects to their spirit.) For a soldier, memory-altering drugs such as this could mean violent combat becoming no more troubling, retrospectively, than a visit to the gym. (wow, is that what we want? Soldiers with no conscience? Mindless Killing machines that are then returned home an unleashed on an unsuspecting public?) “The problem is,” Professor Moreno says, “what else are they blocking when they do this? Do we want a generation of veterans who return without guilt?” You may not even need drugs to short-out the unwanted side effects of battle. Dr Albert “Skip” Rizzo, a psychologist from the University of Southern California, has created a “virtual Iraq” video game, in which veterans have been able to re-enact their experiences to release pent-up stress.
Generals not only want stronger, more alert and less stressed soldiers; they want smarter ones, too. One of the most bizarre neuroscience findings in recent years is that by immersing the human brain in a powerful magnetic field, its powers of reasoning and learning are almost magically enhanced.No one knows exactly how “transcranial magnetic stimulation” (TMS) works, but the Australian neuroscientist Professor Allan Snyder believes that magnetic fields in some way “switch off” the higher levels of mental processing that normally cloud our thoughts, allowing a “pure” form of reasoning to take over.
“Each of us could draw like a professional, do lightning-fast arithmetic,” he says. In fact, some subjects in TMS experiments have acquired (temporarily) similar abilities to the rare “autistic savants“, people who are able to perform astounding arithmetical feats and memorise whole telephone directories (an autistic savant was played by Dustin Hoffman in the film Rain Man).
In 2009, a US Academy of Sciences report concluded that within 20 years we could be using TMS to enhance soldiers’ fighting capabilities. As Professor Moreno says, “there is talk of TMS machines being used on the battlefields within 10 years in vehicles and in 10 years more in helmets.” Why? Being a soldier demands a high level of technical expertise. It is no longer just a case of pointing a gun and shooting. Even combat rifles are now “systems” and mastering battlefield electronics requires a lot of training.
It may seem clear that if you could create a man with no scruples, who feels little pain and no fear, you would have an excellent fighting machine, but this may be a case of be careful what you wish for. We get scared for a reason – to avoid danger to ourselves and others. Fatigue may force us to rest before sustaining damaging injury. Even post-traumatic stress disorder may have a beneficial role. Moral scruples help soldiers to act as an effective team – in battle, troops will always say they are fighting for their mates before Queen and country.
Take away the humanity of the soldiers and there is a danger that the battles and wars we fight will become inhuman as well. Most of all there is, surely, a danger that these techniques, far from producing better soldiers, will actually produce a squad of zoned-out zombies, who will be no match for the determined, driven and highly motivated zealots of the Taliban.
spacer
Future armies could be made up of half-human half-machine cyborgs with infrared sight, ultrasonic hearing and super strength, equipped with mind-controlled weapons.
In a US Army report, experts from Devcom – the Combat Capabilities Development Command – outlined a number of possible future technologies that could be used to enhance soldiers on the battlefield by 2050. (Which means they are already in the works.)
These include enhanced limbs for increased strength, an eye that provides infrared and ultraviolet vision, and an audio device that provides ultra- and subsonic hearing.
They also suggest a future soldier could have a neural device that optimises brain power and allow them to control weapons with their mind.
The term ‘cyborg’ was first coined in a NASA study on the long-term impact of space study by Manfred Clynes and Nathan Cline.
The word is a portmanteau formed from cybernetic organism and is an organism that has been optimised by creating interactions between flesh and machine.
The study involved breaking down the future design of a cyborg soldier into the main areas of enhancement likely to be possible by 2050.
They examined changes to the eyes, ears, brain and muscular system through four ‘case studies’ examining the different technologies that could be developed and what impact they would have on society and warfare.
The study predicted that human machine enhancements would become widely available before 2050 and likely be led by medical use rather than the military.
‘The healthcare market will fuel human machine enhancements primarily to augment the loss of functionality from injury or disease’, the report claims.
Devcon suggests that as well as being better fighters, enhancing soldiers with technology could improve their chance of survival if hit during battle.
‘One could argue that failure to invest in responsible development of these potentially lifesaving technologies would be unethical.’
Authors of the report suggest that a lot of work would need to be done on changing ‘hearts and minds’ to make people more receptive of adapted soldiers, especially after they return to civilian life.
They say that an individual re-entering civilian life with enhanced abilities would have a defined competitive advantage over non-enhanced individuals. (They will also be much more aggressive with less of a conscience. More prone to violence without remorse.)
The team questioned whether soldiers with enhancements should be ‘throttled’ back to a normal level when entering society and if so what normal levels should be.
They also raised concerns over national security.
One participant in the study said: ‘If I can’t walk into a sensitive compartmented information facility wearing an iWatch or carrying a cellphone, how will security be confident it is safe to allow a cyborg to walk in there?’
This was just a thought experiment and we are unlikely to see an ‘enhanced soldier’ with all of these changes by 2050, however there is some suggestion in the report that part, if not all of the technologies could be fairly common within 30 years.
The Devcon team suggest the perception of cyborgs would need to be changed from one of danger to a more positive understanding.
‘Across popular social and open-source media, literature, and film, the use of machines to enhance the physical condition of the human species has received a distorted and dystopian narrative in the name of entertainment.
‘More accurate depiction of technology and its applications in fiction and nonfiction media could lay the groundwork for a new generation that sees opportunity for societal benefits in cyborg technologies;, the report says.
They say that if if technology is to become a more intimate partner in the physical enhancement of the human species then defence personnel would need to work to alter cultural narratives to create a ‘more positive narrative’.
So what exactly does the study think will be developed in order to create the cyborg super soldier of the future?
Enhanced vision through eye implants
This implant would likely overlay the existing ocular tissue and make use of retinal walls to show streams of data that would be sent through the optic nerve to the brain where they could be processed.
The study says that this data would be very different to what the optic nerve normally processes so fighters would have to learn how to understand and interpret what the brain is being fed.
They say this would offer small teams the ability to acquire and share data in real time including visual images in infrared and ultraviolet light.
The report suggests that this technology could also be used in medicine to give sight to people who are blind.
Better muscle control through a sensor web
A web of sensors would be implanted under the skin of the soldier that would be networked to deliver stimulation through programmed light pulses.
The implanted network would be able to interact with external sensors in clothes, boots and eye wear linked to a central computer controller.
This network of sensor could make the muscles ‘dance’ in a consistent way and be used to improve performance, decrease injury and create automated hazard avoidance where the soldier’s movement could be controlled remotely.
‘The network could be programmed to control their bodies to perform complex tasks for which they are not accustomed. It would in effect, take control of the motions of a warfighter’s limbs, thereby allowing a novice to perform functions professionally.’
Improved hearing through cochlea implants
Experts suggest that to improve hearing and communication abilities, especially in the early days of cyborg soldiers, the middle-ear bones and cochlea would need to be replaced or modified.
This would give those soldiers a greater dynamic range of hearing which would help filter overexposure and increase sensitivity to low-amplitude sounds.
This could expand to allow the fighter to hear infrasonic and ultrasonic sounds and allow for covert speech through neural signalling.
‘The current level of evasiveness suggests that this technology would only be employed by individuals with significant hearing loss’, the authors say.
Technology control through brain implants
This would come in the form of direct neural enhancements that would allow data to be transferred between the human brain and technology as well as between two human minds without having to speak.
‘These interactions would allow warfighters direct communication with unmanned and autonomous systems, as well as with other humans, to optimise command and control systems and operations’, the report says.
The technology would likely involve electrodes being implanted into the brain giving the soldier the ability to directly communicate with others and machines.
‘It is anticipated that specialized operators will be using neural implants for enhanced operation of assets by the year 2030′, the report claims.
spacer
CRISPR in Context: The New Word of Human Genetic Engineering
Spacer
You are probably oblivious to this fact. It is true. AI has already surpassed human intellect. Yet “Scientists” continue to feed it greater and more massive amounts of data. They keep building bigger and bigger Machines with bigger and wider networks from more and more sources. There will be no controlling AI. IF GOD does not come and rescue mankind, it is GAME OVER
spacer
They are making quantum computing available to the public on a limited basis. That may get you very excited, and you may think that is a wonderful thing… IT IS NOT! We have been training their AI system for years now. US, ourselves. WE have been feeding the machine OUR DATA. DATA is what the machine needs to develop. Once we got onto the INTERNET WE became our own worst enemy. Voluntarily, out of IGNORANCE, we have been feeding the AI machine life. Giving it all it needs to STEAL, KILL and DESTROY US!
NOW our lives are so dependent on computers, WE ARE LOCKED IN. SLAVES to the system that will be our DOWNFALL.
spacer
This to me is THE MOST HORRIFYING DEVELOPMENT OF ALL. If everyone knew what it means to live forever without GOD… they would be dropping on their knees and praying that GOD comes to rescue us before this is the fate of everyone on earth. AI has made it a real likelihood. Not just a possibility, but a REAL LIKELIHOOD, that people will seek death and not be able to find it. Just like the Bible SAYS! Because, the elite’s plan for you is to merge with the machine. Whether you are able to keep your physical body forever in a completely altered state, or you become robot with a human brain, or you no longer even have a body but are just part of a global machine…either way you are not going to like it. When the realization of the nightmare comes to you, YOU WILL SEEK DEATH! You will literally be living a permanent NIGHTMARE/HORROR MOVIE that you cannot escape.
spacer