RESTORED: 8/12/22
While most of the world happily pursues their own agendas, willingly ignorant of the existence of mind control and blindly trusting those who govern our lives, the “scientific” community in cohesion with the military have developed and perfected the method of mind control that will change not only our world but our bodies and minds, yea even our humanity forever.
I know that most people find this inconceivable and prefer to believe that those of us who are warning of the impending doom are merely crazy conspiracy theorists with nothing better to do than spend our time thinking of ideas or concepts that will scare people to death. To what end I don’t know. Just what people think truthers possibly have to gain from speaking the truth is beyond my understanding. We certainly don’t gain many friends, or the respect of our loved ones, we don’t gain any standing in our communities, nor any financial gain. We are ridiculed, mocked, threatened, attacked by the forces of darkness, and considered Public Enemy No 1 by our government.
Well, today folks, I am hoping that you will take us seriously. The hammer is about to fall. If you at least KNOW that it is coming you have a chance at being able to deal with it. I would like to say that this post is not intended to scare anyone, but realistically, just sharing these truths with you I am certain will have the affect of frightening you. Sometimes we NEED TO BE SCARED.
But, know that it is not my desire to scare you, only to wake you up to truth. This is their agenda and they are quite close to realizing it. Closer every day. In fact, if Jesus Christ/Yeshua HaMashiach does not return SOON, there will be no flesh left to save. I only recently came to truly understand the meaning of that scripture. Through my research, I have learned that the Elite were DEADLY SERIOUS about making us transhumans whether we like it or not. In fact, they have moved on to their next goal which is to make us NO LONGER HUMAN by any stretch of the imagination. They are ready to make us live forever as SLAVE MACHINES.
spacer
“And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.” Matthew 24:22
spacer
“And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.” Revelation 9:6
spacer
1.64K subscribers
Jul 11, 2022 Artificial Intelligence is pretty much THE HOLY GRAIL of Future Technologies. There is no big Company nor University, which is not working on the development of Artificial Intelligence. Role models are often the superior performance of the biological brain, but that’s also a lot of work. So a development team in Australia therefore wants to save tedious development time and insert brain cells into Computers! You may think that sounds crazy? But their first prototype is already learning faster than traditional Artificial Intelligences of computers. How did they even do that? This is exactly what we will talk about in this video.
Apr 9, 2021
Neuralink just implanted a chip in a monkey’s brain and demonstrated it playing video games with its mind. The science behind that could be a game-changer.
End of Update
spacer
Anthony’s revelation led to further scrutiny of the CIA. It later emerged that the United States government had been experimenting on how to control the human mind immediately after the end of the Second World War. In 1945, the government secretly recruited many Nazi scientists, some of whom had been identified and prosecuted as war criminals during the Nuremberg Trials. The recruitment was code-named Operation Paperclip. The objective of Operation Paperclip was to tap into the knowledge of these Nazi criminal scientists. The Nazis were told that if they would agree and work for the United States government, the government would protect them from prosecution. The Nazis agreed rather than being sent to the gallows.
After recruiting them into the United States, the government used the Nazis in many highly clandestine experiments. One of such experiments was how to control the human mind through technology and science. With the help of the Nazis, in the 1950s, the CIA and the Defense Department conducted secret research codenamed MKULTRA. The project was later renamed Project ARTICHOKE. The purpose was to study mind control, interrogation, behavior modification and related topics.
When these secrets were made public, the CIA never contested them, except to say it discontinued the programs. But the big question here is: can we trust the CIA? What if they succeeded in inventing a technology to control the human mind with which we are unaware of?
In 2013, the BBC published an article titled “Are we close to making human ‘mind control’ a reality?” In the article, it was said that Rajesh Raoa, a researcher at the University of Washington, had succeeded in playing a computer game with his mind without using any physical controllers.
Mr Raoa’s invention convinced many researchers that mind control is no longer a conspiracy theory, that it is real. Some researchers expressed grave concerns about the invention of Raoa, saying it could lead to a Zombie apocalypse.
“When we have full links into the brain directly and you can control someone like a robot then we might have problems,” said Dr Ian Pearson, a futurologist with a background in science and engineering.
To further prove to you without any ambiguity that mind control is real, and that the technology to do the highly immoral, unethical and corrupt job is available, we look at something we have chanced upon on the internet.
We’ve come across scientific research published on the internet with patent number US 6506148 B2. It is titled “Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors.”
spacer
Mass Mind Control Tech Is Real
COMPLETE control, ZERO lag, instantaneous response of the cattle for ultimate economic efficiency. They want every single aspect of this planet centrally controlled, the bugs, the weather, the animals, the humans, the earth itself. They would dictate the heavenly bodies if they could.
They want us to wake and sleep following our exactly programmed schedules for their “perfect” society. These mechanisms are already in place covertly but nothing is ever enough for these weirdos.
spacer
spacer
Master
Would you willing to get a implanted microchip for convenience to pay for stuff on the quick go, opening a door, medical, starting up your car etc? Hispanic-Cool-Guy Master Yes, the convenience seems appealing. Vote A No, I don’t desire a chip within in my body for convenience. Vote B I’m not sure. Vote C Other. Vote D 8 Girl Opinion 18 Guy Opinion
—-
spacer
Neurolink/Leon Musk is getting ready to implant humans with his brain/computer link. Watch this video and see why those who are not aware will be welcoming the opportunity to be tethered to the WEB.
spacer
spacer
Well, it’s going to happen by force one day to get chipped or be beheaded for the cause of the gospel and Jesus Christ:
The ultimate objective, according to Musk, is for Neuralink to help create a symbiotic relationship between humans and computers. Musk argues that Neuralink-like devices could help humanity keep up with super-fast machines.
Neuralink’s device is just one part of the brain linkup puzzle, Tracey explains. There are three fields at play: molecular medicine to make and find the targets, neuroscience to understand how the pathways control the target, and the devices themselves. Advances in each area can help the others. Neuralink may help map new pathways, for example, but it’s just one aspect of what needs to be done to make it work as planned.
Neuralink’s smaller chips may also help avoid issues with brain scarring seen with larger devices, Tracey says. And advancements in robots can also help with surgeries, an area Neuralink has detailed before.
But perhaps the biggest benefit from the announcement is making the field cool again.
“If and to the extent that a new, very cool device elevates the discussion on the neuroscience implications of new devices, and what do we need to get these things to the benefit of humanity through more science, that’s all good,” Tracey says.
spacer
Poor Gertrude, the unwilling brain surgery recipient did not want to come out of her pen. Neuralink founder and real-life Tony Stark giggled nervously as the handlers tried to coax the small brown pig from its corner.
Musk surmised that Gertrude found something of keen interest in that spot. I think the pig was still smarting from the indignity of a brain implant it never asked for, one that somehow seems to know when it finds something of interest, but could not tell Musk why Gertrude didn’t want to come out.
First, there was the concept of think to act. Musk said that the implant would allow users to send words directly to a phone or computer, essentially cutting out the onerous middleman of your fingers and the keyboard. It’s not something I imagine people with full abilities would care to do, but there are obvious implications for the differently abled and those with degenerative diseases like ALS, where they lose the ability to move and talk. I think Musk and the Neuralink team made a tactical error in not leaning hard enough into the palliative implications of Neuralink.
Next, when someone asked about the ability to access memories, Musk chose not to demure on what would surely be a hot-button topic. Instead, he answered, “In the future, you will you be able to save and replay memories,” but he quickly admitted that this was all starting to sound like a Black Mirror episode.
Instantly, my Twitter feed filled up with mentions of a very specific Black Mirror episode, The Entire History of You, in which a character uses a new “grain” tech to scroll back and forth through memories.
Many people were not thrilled with this level of brain access. However, as someone who forgets things with alarming regularity, I wouldn’t mind a device that actually pays attention and helps me remember the name of the bloke I’ve met at least five times before.
Musk, who is often too easily baited on Twitter, refused to damp down any of the hyperbolic questions and requests. Super vision (ultraviolet, infrared)? Sure, that could happen. Telepathy? Why not.
Neuralink is not, it seems, just about listening, understanding, and affecting our brain information in a positive way. It’s about mastering the inscrutable brain in a way that’s never been done before.
Imagine being able to suppress fear and pain. On the surface, that sounds awesome. Who needs pain? Who needs fear? Um, we do. I remember reading that pain is the way our brain protects us from harm. When you burn your finger, nerve endings send the message to your brain, which then delivers a pain sensation. Without that sensation, we don’t remove our hand from the fire. Fear is what stops us from doing dangerous, stupid things. On the other hand, it also stops us from doing things that might be awesome, fun, or produce reward down the line. Perhaps some suppression of fear could be a good thing. (Yes, but again, that is a good thing. It protects you from doing further damage to yourself. Like an athlete that has excruciating pain in their joint that keeps them from playing in a big game. Assuredly prevented them from further injury. Pain also plays a crucial role in our healing process. Pain is the message that tells your brain where to send help to accommodate healing and begins the process. Without it your healing would take much longer, or perhaps never be fully realized.)
Still, between that and Musk’s cavalier treatment of the pigs, one of which had two implants and another that had one implanted and then removed, I watched with an increasing degree of unease and queasiness.
It’s worth remembering that Musk is building Neuralink, which recently received FDA Breakthrough Device distinction as it marches toward human trials, not so much to save mankind from human frailty as much as he is to save us all from our own artificial intelligence folly. Musk has long been convinced that if we did not make our selves smarter, add more AI than AI’s can have themselves, we will fall behind and live through an inevitable Skynet future.
There is clear promise in Musk’s Neuralink work, as it could provide potential relief for, for instance, chronic pain sufferers, the mentally ill, and Parkinson patients, but I worry that all those benefits were lost in the hyperbole.
Gertrude got it. She never asked Musk for the implant. It hasn’t substantially improved her life, and she’d rather not come out of the pen. I think I’ll hang back with Gertrude, too.
spacer
What is Neuralink? The four by four millimeter chip sits in a sealed cylinder where it is inserted in the back of your head. Made up of 1,024 electrodes, the N1 works with your brain’s neurons to solve neurological mysteries. Musk believes the micro-chip will be able to solve any neurological disorder from Parkinson’s to Alzheimer’s. (this is the old version of the chip.)
“Neuralink” is a start-up created by Elon Musk in 2016. The company’s main aim is brain implants development by means of electronic chips that are inserted into the brain and equipped with a form of artificial intelligence. This kind of technology focuses on helping persons with disabilities, for example, to communicate or to move. At first glance, “Neuralink” does not seem to present any particular ethical difficulties. Helping persons with disabilities respects the principle of beneficence, in other words, it acts or has qualities of mercy, kindness, generosity, charity, altruism, love, humanity, and promoting the good of others. But Elon Musk clarified his goal: “Over time I think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence” (World Government Summit in Dubai). And he continued: “Some high bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence.” In 2020, Musk indicated that “you could upload, you could basically store your memories as a backup and restore the memories, then ultimately you could potentially download them into a new body or into a robot body“.
For a long time, Elon Musk was afraid of the prospect of deep artificial intelligence, also called the “Singularity” – that is, the creation of an intelligent machine with a form of autonomy and a better organizational potential than human abilities. For him, this would be a dangerous situation which is why he supports research to merge human intelligence and artificial intelligence, and thus to avoid that the latter exceed the former. The brain implant development is conceptualized in this context, but we can notice a logical contradiction in Musk’s reasoning, e.g., developing AI to limit its advancement.
It is maybe excessive to consider Musk’s thinking in terms of a philosophical system. It is rather a futurist vision of human beings, extrapolated from observable trends today, especially in space exploration, self-driving cars and the current development of AI. But, while Musk’s thinking is not a philosophical system, it is nonetheless inspired by different philosophical theories. We can explore at least two of them.
The anthropological dimension: human perfectibility.
The first dimension is anthropological: it is the idea of human perfectibility. We especially know it through Rousseau’s philosophy, but a version of it can be found in William Godwin’s writing: “By perfectible, it is not meant that he [the human being] is capable of being brought to perfection. But the word seems sufficiently adapted to express the faculty of being continually made better and receiving perpetual improvement; and in this sense, it is here to be understood. The term perfectible, this explained, not only does not imply the capacity of being brought the perfection, but stands in express opposition to it.” Thus, there is no apparent limit to perfectibility. This manner of understanding human perfectibility is typical to Musk’s vision of the human being.
This is an interesting aspect because a lot of people accept this sense of the notion and consider that is one of humanity’s defining features. On the one hand, it is an optimistic notion because it is full of promises for humanity’s future. As if we will always find solutions to overcome vulnerabilities that cause suffering and misfortunes, even if it generally refers to an indeterminate future.
But on the other hand, we know that progress can eventually become a new source of vulnerability. For instance, cars (1885, Tricycle Benz 1), and planes (1903, Wright brothers flight) represented a significant progress before they became a serious problem for living beings. Today they are polluting the earth and are a major threat to biodiversity. For this reason, the notion of human perfectibility can be a source of concern when it is used to justify the achievement of anything technologically possible. It is in this context that “bio-conservatives” denounce the “Neuralink” project as a moral transgression because different essential limits would be erased, limits which constitute what it means to be human. According to “bio-conservatives”, the “Neuralink”‘ brain implant suppresses the frontier between natural/artificial, human/machine, living/no-living. Thus, the merger of human intelligence and artificial intelligence sought by Musk would be as much an artificialization of the human as a humanization of the machine.
If this type of hybridization could seriously help a person with a disability, we could have a positive moral judgment about it. If it is rather a question of access to a type of immortality by suppressing the biological body in favor of a robotic body, we could still contend that such a pursuit depends on each person’s desires, so long as there is no damage for others (minimalist ethics). But in this case how can a competition for more human performances (human being enhancement) be avoided? With the high cost of these neurotechnologies, one can fear that only a small part of the richest population will have access to them. There would be an even bigger physical and social disparity than the one we know currently, and potentially, a hierarchy of value attributed to individuals. In this case, it is not clear that we would look positively upon the Neuralink project, and it is not only a question of its purpose since it would probably not result in a co-evolution between human biology and technology, but in a domination of the latter over the former.
These last ethical elements are important because they highlight a second philosophical dimension of Musk’s vision: liberalism.
The moral dimension: liberalism
Neuralink and the Musk’s futurist vision of the human being supposes a philosophical theory that we name “liberalism”, owed to John Locke in its modern form. We can retain at least two crucial ideas. The first is economic freedom. Everyone has the right to have a property and to use it as they see fit so long as they do not use it to cause damage to others. As a startup, Neuralink is Musk’s property. The second idea is intellectual freedom, such as freedom of expression, the right to develop one’s ideas, beliefs and values. In other words, the individual’s responsibility is anchored in individual rights. All these aspects can be found in Neuralink in two dimensions: technological liberalism and moral liberalism.
Neuralink is a startup and as such, it seeks to achieve certain economic objectives to exist. We know AI development is an important growth area and it is understandable that Neuralink also adheres to this mantra of the liberal economy in its project to develop “intelligent” brain implants. More specifically, we can speak of technological liberalism to denote economic goals closely related to technological progress. Nonetheless, this correlation implies significant promises, to not say utopias. Indeed, Musk promises a form of immortality, but delivering on such a promise seem far off. This begs the following question: if the idea of immortality were not so lucrative, would Musk still want to develop a brain computer interface to upload our mind into a robotic body? But maybe it is reasonable to question whether the enhancement project is not more of a marketing strategy, possibly to support the medical aspect.
With Neuralink project, Musk does not claim to want to impose on anyone an “intelligent” device brain implant; neither, if it were even possible, to become immortal. Everyone makes their own decisions and if some individuals wish to receive a brain implant, then no one should discourage or stop them because this would imply constraining individual beliefs and values.
In other words, everyone remains free to do what they want and as long as no one causes intentional damage to another. No one has to dictate to others a particular conception of the Good. In this moral context, Neuralink is in keeping with liberalism in that nobody can claim to know what is best for someone else and in that everyone has sovereign control over their own body. (But not only is there no safeguards to guarantee that forced implants would not become the case, everything points to that being the likely end result. The elite are looking to control the masses and this is definitely the tool that would give them that control.)
To conclude, even if we were to adhere to the idea that freedom is about every individual’s right to choose, we must consider, for example, the limited accessibility to neurotechnologies due to their cost. Namely, this could have the effect of favoring already privileged social categories for certain professions (i.e. medicine, sciences, philosophy…), or even for major political professions, such as the professions of higher administration. It would raise serious questions for democracies.
(Not only that, but the Elite have declared that there is no such thing as Freedom. They consider the masses as their chattle, their property, their assets to be disposed of as they see fit.)
At the same time, we cannot deprive ourselves of the potential benefits of “intelligent” brain implants and their applications to help medical diagnostic and therapeutic gaps in various brain disorders, and also to improve social relations and preserve natural conditions of living beings. For this reason, brain sciences and neurotechnologies are an important field for social, ethical and philosophical reflection. (Are you serious? What a joke. When has technology every been an improvement for our social, ethical and philosophical well being?) Even though Neuralink is a private initiative, the “tomorrow” that this startup traces requires a form of moral responsibility (from a society and an Scientific/Technological community that is morally bankrupt.) which need not be only understood as an individual choice: a human community is not a sum of individuals, otherwise (if one were to consider it as such) one runs the risk of condemning the idea of humanity and humanist values). This is the reason why Musk morally cannot avoid the philosophical question – “What is Human?” (Humanity most assuredly is made up of individuals, that is how God made it. We are each morally and ethically responsible for our own choices. Every society is affected by those choices of the individuals within it. We do all stand as one as far as our membership in society goes. Nations a are judged an everyone in them suffers. However, at the same time, the individuals within those nations are also judge individually. Those who are in right standing with GOD are spared and carried through whatever the nation suffers.)
Human perfectibility does not come by way of Technology. Human perfection comes by way of the cross. God made Mankind in His OWN IMAGE. What an insult to Him that man should think he can do better.
While Jesus was here on Earth, Jesus/Yeshua the Only Begotten Son of GOD. God and man in the flesh, who was definitely perfect, give us instruction on how to become perfect in Matthew Chapter 5, here is a portion of that text. Read the full text HERE
spacer
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
spacer
Sep 6, 2020
Neuralink aims to treat some of the most severe and damaging neurological diseases on Earth. In terms of Alzheimer’s, dementia, and epilepsy, a Neuralink device would be a great way to prevent these diseases from ruining everyday life for those who have been affected by them. With that being said, Neuralink needs not to treat anxiety and depression disorders, because those illnesses require human reaction and vulnerability to treat. Defeating anxiety and depression should be done without the help of a complete fix, and it is crucial not to look past the importance of humans being able to feel these two sensations.
… I don’t think that everyone should completely rid themselves of anxiety and depression. Why? Because they are two emotions, as humans, we need to have.
Anxiety, while painful and difficult to confront head-on, is necessary for some reasons. The first being the obvious, anxiety is an excellent way to sense when danger is near, and it is a crucial part of our fight or flight response. It can warn someone when there is an issue with what is going on near them and can be life-saving in certain circumstances.
Anxiety also is an opportunity to grow as a human being.Facing and confronting anxious thoughts is one of the best ways to test resilience and learn about what we are made of. Anxiety teaches us a lot about ourselves, and while frightening, facing it directly is one of the best ways to show that we can push through certain circumstances that we aren’t confident about.
…Depression, while more severe in my own experiences, also has its advantages. Without darkness, we wouldn’t know what light is. Without depression, we wouldn’t know about happiness. There are points where humans need to face adversity and challenging circumstances to feel the great things about life.
…It is dangerous, in my opinion, to remove core emotional responses from a human. Nobody wants to be depressed, and nobody wants to be anxious. But treating these diseases is done by finding out who we are as people. It requires us to go out of our comfort zones and grow, not put a chip in our heads or a pill in our throats that eliminates the possibility of feeling certain sensations.
There comes the point where our humanness needs to be preserved. The invention of Smartphones has taken away a lot of opportunities for face-to-face interaction, and there is plenty of evidence to suggest that anxiety and depression disorders are caused by these devices, especially through social media use.
spacer
spacer
Putting an implant in healthy people? That would require extraordinary evidence of safety. And that’s hard to picture, because as soon as you open someone’s head you put that person’s life at risk. We at MIT Technology Review know of only one case of a healthy person getting a brain implant: a crazy stunt undertaken in Central America by a scientist trying to do research on himself. It caused life-threatening complications.
Musk doesn’t seem to be considering the ethical problems at all. It’s cool tech, but I wouldn’t let anyone stick wires in my brain unless it was to treat a serious medical problem with tested procedures.
Elon Musk hopes to put a computer chip in your brain. Who wants one? – CNN
—
—
During his presentation, Musk said Neuralink aims to make the surgery for the company’s implant “equivalent to a LASIK type of thing where you sit down, a machine does its thing, and you can walk away within a few hours,” all without a hospital stay.
He spoke about the wires that would be implanted under a person’s skull as threads; a robot for implanting them would bypass blood vessels and cause “minimal trauma,” he claimed.
It sounds simpler than the way people receive implants today. Essentially, as things work now, the skull is cut open, the brain is exposed, chips are installed, connectors are mounted to the skull, and the head is stitched up.
Yet the reality is that implanting a device underneath the skull will remain brain surgery. Neuralink acknowledges it will still need to bore a hole in your skull, for instance.
“It’s still surgery; it’s still risky,” de Sa said. “People can die in even the simplest surgeries.”
In the video on CNN’s website you can listen to Musk in his own words tell you why he feels we have no choice but to ride along with AI and become symbiotic with the flow. To View: Click Here
spacer
spacer
spacer
A HI-TECH chip that’s lodged into the brain could be implanted into a human for the first time next year, Elon Musk says. (That is this year 2022)
The billionaire’s Neuralink firm has been working on a device that could allow those with physical disabilities to control a computer with their thoughts.
But the Tesla founder also has his sights on bigger things, aiming to one day restore full-body functionality to quadriplegic sufferers. (The elite always hold out carrots to gain support from the masses. Though sometimes there may actually be positive side effects these are NEVER their true goals or motivations.)
Speaking to Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council Conference, Musk said he is “cautiously optimistic”.
He boasted that his company’s standards for implanting the device are higher than what the US health and safety agency, the FDA, demands.
“I think we have a chance with Neuralink to restore full-body functionality to someone who has a spinal cord injury,” he said.
“I don’t want to raise hopes unreasonably, but I’m increasingly convinced that this could be done.”
spacer
According to the TED Talk 2022 website, the billionaire Epstein associate will give a presentation promoting his book “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic” during his appearance at the conference on April 10.
The Microsoft co-founder and depopulation advocate will also discuss “what it’s been like to become the subject of conspiracy theories.”
Musk, a new majority Twitter shareholder who has emerged as the richest person in the history of the world with an estimated $256bn fortune, is glorified by the mainstream as “The Most Badass CEO In America” and a pop-cultural icon.
But like Gates, the SpaceX CEO is endeavoring to spearhead a transhumanism evolution.
spacer
Out in the Open Elon Mush AIDS IN COMBAT AGAINST RUSSIA!!!
spacer
spacer
Musk’s brain chip firm, Neuralink, is currently recruiting for a “clinical trial director” to run tests in humans with brain chips or “brain hacking” technology.
The brain chips would be “implanted flush with skull & charges wirelessly, so you look and feel totally normal,” Musk has disclosed.
Neurolink has already implanted artificial intelligence microchips in the brains of monkeys and pigs.
“Musk has previously claimed that Neuralink’s technology could eventually be used to augment humans, potentially enabling people to store and replay their memories like watching videos on computers,” Fortune reports.
Elon Musk Exposed
Neurolink’s human clinical trials of its brain chip technology are slated to begin later this year.
Posted by u/Jax_Gatsby
2 months ago
Even the president of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Stephen Oelrich said:“…ultimately, the mrna vaccines are an example for that cell or gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body? We would’ve probably had a 95% refusal rate”. – Source
The question then is, what is the gene therapy really for and why did they initially hide the fact that it’s a gene therapy? Well, I think the president of Bayer answered the second question.
Alot of people behind the effort to get everyone vaccinated are into transhumanism and merging the human mind with A.I. These are people like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Noah Harari and Ray Kurzweil. Kurzweil wrote a book called ‘The Singularity Is Near’ and the ‘singularity’ is essentially the same as the fourth industrial revolution, at least when it comes to merging humanity with A.I. Here’s how he describes it:
“...there won’t be a clear distinction between humans and machines. Computers are not gonna be these rectangular devices in our pockets, they’re gonna be inside our bodies.” – Source
When these people talk about this stuff they say it as if the people will have no choice. So how are they going to force people to get the nano tech to do this kind of stuff in their bodies? Well, if they were to actually do it, doing it through a vaccine would be the best way. According to neurophysiologist James Fallon P.H.D they can use gene editing tools (like CRISPR) and:
“they can be injected into certain areas of the brain so that we can change your brain cells and turn you into something you wouldn’t otherwise be“. – Source.
If this is actually what the whole “covid” scam is about then the push to get literally everyone “vaccinated” makes sense, and all the insanity happening in the name of “covid”.
spacer