Warning: Undefined array key "file" in /home/eyeopeningtruth/public_html/wp-includes/media.php on line 1763
RESTORED: 4/26/23
Astro=STARS. The bible says that GOD created all the Stars of the Heavens and named them. He assigned them each a task and a place. Some stars remained in one place and some he called wandering stars /planets. But even the “Wandering plantes had boundaries set by GOD. These Stars were actually also called Angels. They are entities not rocks. God made them luminous, gave them light. Just as he gave light to the Sun and a different light to the Moon. Some of these Stars/Angels left their place and came down to earth. They broke the laws of heaven.
These are knowns as the Fallen Angels. They corrupted all life on earth by mixing seed. These Fallen Angels were worshiped by the ancients as gods and demigods. They ruled over the earth until Christ came and redeemed the Earth and mankind. We have been living in the AGE OF GRACE. But God’s word says the fallen would return to Earth to wreak havoc. Those who have rejected Christ and chosen the pagan path worship there entities. They have been preparing the earth for their return.
THAT is what all this is about. Demonic spirit have been guiding and directing their path. Giving them hidden knowledge. It is not because of man’s evil that all the knowledge is alway ends up being used for evil and destruction. It is due to the evil influence of the Powers of Darkness.
Believe me when I tell you that the ELITE KNOW DEMONS ARE REAL! They also know the truth about space.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
astro-
“application of photography to the stars, sun, planets, etc.,” 1858, from astro- + photography.
spacer
“Astrofest La Palma” opens the doors for registration.
From 25th September 2015 to October 9th, the island of La Palma in the Canaries will host Astrofest, a festival of astronomy, with activities for all ages and knowledge levels. There will be an international conference for astrotourism professionals, a spectacular total eclipse of the moon, an international conference for nightscape photographers, and a night photography masterclass. You can find more details and register for all these events at the festival’s website,http://astrofestlapalma.com/
The program begins with the first International Astrotourism Conference, on September 25-27th. This is the first meeting of its kind, and it will bring together travel agents, tourist boards, scientists, environmentalists, Starlight Guides and others, to pool their experiences and reflections on the astro-tourism.
The beautiful island of La Palma is the perfect place for this fiesta because it has the best night sky in Europe: dark, clean and calm. Just ask the people who chose it as the site for the world’s biggest single mirror telescope, Gran Telescopio Canarias, along with the other 16 telescopes which make up the Observatory of the Roque de Los Muchachos. La Palma is also famous for it’s beautiful scenery in the daytime. On a clear day from the island’s summit you can see 143 km to Tenerife, and on a clear night you can see two million light years to the Andromeda galaxy.
spacer
The Cabildo de La Palma, through the Ministry of Tourism, reinforces scientific and astronomical tourism by incorporating the ‘Astrofest La Palma 2022′ to the annual agenda of the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO).
This fact is the result of the meeting held by the Palma Tourism Service at the twenty-fourth General Assembly of the World Tourism Organization held the first days of December in Madrid.
The counselor, Raúl Camacho, highlights the importance of the tourism sector and astrotourism in the island economy, both in terms of social development and job creation, “which makes it an essential engine for recovery that, now more than never, is it necessary to boost on the island to counteract the impact that the volcano’s eruption is having ”.
After the forty-third plenary session of the Affiliate Members of the UNWTO, it has been concluded that for the work program of 2022 the aim is to give relevance to scientific tourism since the combination of science and tourism on the horizon of the tourism industry provides opportunities for developed destinations and makes them more sustainable.
This is why they are constantly pushing tourism throughout thi volcanic event. That is also why the spend so much time and money investing in all the scientific documentation, sample collecting, technical testing and evaluating of eveery aspect of the event and promototing it through pictures, videos an social media.
Raúl Camacho also assures that ‘Astrofest La Palma 2022′ “will be key to promoting the island as a differentiated astrotourism destination, thanks to the quality of its sky, an attraction that will also be reinforced in the coming months with the opening of the Center Visitors to the Roque de los Muchachos ”.
In this way, he underlines in a note, “we will increase the profile of La Palma as an island of international reference in astronomy, astrophysics and astrotourism, while raising awareness about astrotourism as a sustainable tourism product for destinations around the world.”
Ministerio de la Presidencia
@M_Presidencia
The Government of Spain foresees that by the end of the year it will have mobilized 240M € for the reconstruction of the island of #LaPalma in coordination with all the administrations. “There is a future on the island of La Palma, we are working to restore normalcy as soon as possible.” LINK TO VIDEO: https://twitter.com/i/status/1468614327045394441 |
The UNWTO scientific tourism working group agreed to work in 2022 on a guide on the creation of the astrotourism product that will serve as a manual of good practices and development of its capacities for tourism public administrations that want to diversify their offer.
In addition, assess all the direct and indirect benefits derived from the protection of the sky such as environmental, cultural, scientific, biodiversity, health, quality of life, and socioeconomic, through astrotourism.
spacer\
La Palma is known by many names
The Star Spangled Sky |
The Sky of the Stars |
The Stars Island | |
The Dark Island | |
La Palma Europe’s Hawaii |
The beautiful island |
cielo de as estrellas / Star Sky
Imagine all the stars in the galaxy spinning in the sky. The bluish-white nuclei of the galaxy’s young stars are surrounded by the yellow octopus arms of their older sisters. On one side, an almost invisible red column of gas snakes away from the starry whirlpool, turns in the middle of the sky, and begins to approach … you.
I see those images in the Volcanic event at La Palma. The lava octopus, the red gassy snakes rising up from the ground and the whirlpool created by the Stromboli explosions of lava dancing around the mouth of cone as the reach into the sky.
spacer
La Palma The Star Spangled Sky
La Palma has also been described as a miniature continent. The island shows a thousand facets, not only during the day, but also at night. Every night, the sky above the small Canarian Island turns into a glittering starry firmament.
We all know the Milky Way, but have you ever seen it with your naked eye? The spangled sky of La Palma is truly impressive … you shouldn’t miss this experience. On the island’s highest mountain, the Roque de los Muchachos (2.426 m), this display of nature turns into a true spectacle, for here, the stars seem to be within the viewer’s grasp.
Let us tell you why.
5 reasons why La Palma has one of the most beautiful starry skies of the world
1. Law against light pollution
Yes, this law really exists and regulates the luminous intensity and the alignment of exterior lighting. The darker the night, the better we can see the spangled sky.
2. The sky is clear and pure
The sky above La Palma is amongst the clearest and purest of the world and offers a clear view, almost like in space.
3. Flyover ban
It is illegal to fly over the island with passenger planes which protects the sky from being polluted.
4. Science; Scientists
On the Roque de los Muchachos, one of the world’s largest telescope arrays is located. Many scientific facilities are located on La Palma because of the uniqueness of its spangled sky. Even the prominent scientist Stephen Hawking came to look at it a few years ago.
5. Almost no industry
La Palma has no industry to speak of and no big cities. Here, the small island amidst the Atlantic Ocean scores doubly.
All this makes La Palma a special place for discovering the stars. See for yourself!
If you won the lottery, would you still work?
Marina Manganaro
Yes but with more telescopes (In the image one of the @MAGICtelescopes
I am working with, on the Canary Island of #LaPalma, Credit: Daniel Lopez (@IAC_Astrofisica)
Atmospheric Extinction at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory,
La Palma
D L King (RGO)
6 September 1985
Atmospheric extinction at the Roque de Los Muchachos Observatory
Introduction
The wavelength dependence of the atmospheric extinction at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory is currently in the process of being measured. Until these data become available, a satisfactory approach for many applications is to correct spectroscopic and photometric observations using a theoretical extinction curve, calculated as suggested by Hayes and Latham (1975). Comparisons between calculated and observed mean extinction coefficients for Lick and Cerro Tololo observatories appear to suggest that the calculated extinction curve is
probably accurate to within a few hundredths of a magnitude. This is also borne out by available data for La Palma (see below).
This note gives such a theoretical extinction curve, appropriate to the altitude of the Roque de los Muchachos observatory and covering the spectral range 3000-11000 A. The data are presented in graphical and tabular form.
Furthermore, this extinction curve is available to SPICA Users in the VAX file:
RGVAD::LDRUGDIR:LAPALMA.EXT
Calculated Extinction Curve
The three main contributions to extinction by the Earth’s atmosphere of relevance to ground-based astronomy are Rayleigh scattering by air molecules, molecular absorption and aerosol scattering. The method outlined by Hayes and Latham (1975) gives the mean extinction for an aerosol-free atmosphere, as follows:
1) Rayleigh scattering
The wavelength (l in mm) and altitude (h in km) dependence of Rayleigh vertical extinction (magnitudes per unit air mass) is approximated by:
ARay (l,h) = 9.4977 x 10-3 x l -4 ((n- 1)l /(n-1)l =1) 2 x e -h/7.996 (1) where the scale height of the lower troposphere is taken to be 7.996 km and h = 2.369 km for the Roque de los
Muchachos Observatory.
The index-of-refraction term is given by: (n- 1)l/(n-1)l =1 = 0.23465 + (1.076 x 102)/(146 – l
-2) + 0.93161/(41 – l -2) (2)
2) Molecular Absorption
The major contributors are absorption bands of ozone and water vapour. The latter is not included in the calculated extinction curve, because the amount of water vapour above any observatory is extremely variable.
Water vapour bands can contribute more than 0.01 mag extinction per unit air mass at 7100, 8090, 9700 and 10800 A.
Vertical extinction by ozone is approximated by:
Aoz(l) = l.11 Toz Koz(l) (3) where Koz (cm-1) is the absorption coefficient (Gast 1960), and Toz (atm cm) is the total ozone above the observatory. Toz is independent of the observatory altitude, since atmospheric O3 is concentrated between 10 and 35 km. It does, however, exhibit seasonal variations and it can also vary significantly on time scales as short as a
few hours. The extinction curve given here uses a mean annual value of Toz appropriate to the latitude of La Palma, taken from Allen (1963).
The total vertical extinction coefficient A(l) for an aerosol-free atmosphere is then given by:
A(l) = ARay(l,h) + Aoz (l) (4) Values of A(l) have been calculated every 10 A between 3000 and 3500 A and every 50 A between 3500 and 11000 A, and are collected in Table 1. The extinction curve is shown in Figure 1, together with preliminary measurements obtained on dust-free nights (Andrews 1985, private communication).
Correction for Dust Extinction
To correct observations for total extinction, the contribution from aerosol scattering must be included. Available data (Jones 1984) suggest that to a first approximation the dust scattering at the Roque de los Muchachos observatory does not depend strongly on wavelength over the range considered here. In this case the dust correction term to the extinction curve can be deduced by comparing A(V), the theoretical extinction coefficient in the V band calculated as in (4) above, with ACAMC(V) the observed mean extinction coefficient in V measured on
the night of the observations by the Carlsberg Automatic Transit Circle group at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory:
AAer = ACAMC(V) – A(V) (5) Values of ACAMC(V) for nights of interest can be obtained upon request from the Meridian Group at RGO Herstmonceux (in the first instance contact L V Morrison on ext. 3365). and will shortly be available on line from a file on the RGO Starlink VAX.
The total vertical extinction is then given by:
ATOT(l) = A(l) + AAer (6)
spacer
(PDF) Optical positions of radio stars observed with the meridian circle of the Real Instituto Y Observatorio de la Armada EN San Fernando
Positions of 53 radio stars observed with a meridian circle are presented. The positions of the radio stars are for the epoch of observation and the equinox J2000.0 and are in a system close to that of the FK5. The limiting magnitude is V = 9.5. The instrument is a classic visual meridian circle. The observation of transits of the stars is visual but automatically recorded; a photoelectric circle reading system stores the positions of the divided circle directly in computer memory. The mean error of a single observation in the zenith is 0.018 s in right ascension and 0.38 arcsec in declination. Comparisons are given of the catalogue with the FK5 and of radio stars positions with those of the Carlsberg Meridian Catalogue La Palma no. 4. Cross-references are given to other catalogues.
400 years of astrometry: from Tycho Brahe to Hipparcos …
Galileo Galilei’s use of the newly invented telescope for astronomical observation resulted immediately in epochal discoveries about the physical nature of celestial bodies, but the advantage for astrometry came much later. The quadrant and sextant were pre-telescopic instruments for measurement of large angles between stars, improved by Tycho Brahe in the years 1570–1590. Fitted with telescopic sights after 1660, such instruments were quite successful, especially in the hands of John Flamsteed. The meridian circle was a new type of astrometric instrument, already invented and used by Ole Rømer in about 1705, but it took a hundred years before it could fully take over. The centuries-long evolution of techniques is reviewed, including the use of photoelectric astrometry and space technology in the first astrometry satellite, Hipparcos, launched by ESA in 1989. Hipparcos made accurate measurement of large angles a million times more efficiently than could be done in about 1950 from the ground, and it will soon be followed by Gaia which is expected to be another one million times more efficient for optical astrometry.
The Beginnings
A General Overview of the Beginnings of the Roque de Los Muchachos Observatory
Roque de Los Muchachos means BOYS ROCKS
Smyth in 1856. Isaac Newton had written: “[Telescopes] cannot be so formed as to take away that confusion of rays which arises from the tremors of the atmosphere. The only remedy is a most serene and quiet air, such as may perhaps be found on the tops of the highest mountains above the grosser clouds.” Following this principle Smyth tested El Teide, the main peak of Tenerife, for its suitability to sustain astronomical observations. In the course of a voyage lasting 113 days in 1856, he spent 65 days at Guajara and Alta Vista on the slopes of El Teide at heights of 2,714m and 3,262m respectively. He performed tests of seeing by separating double stars and extended the magnitude limit of his 18cm refractor by 4 magnitudes to 14th magnitude from its habitual 10th magnitude at Edinburgh. He made meteorological observations of humidity, dew point, windspeed and dust-haze as well as numerous special astronomical observations designed to demonstrate the quality of the sky, for example of solar prominences, zodiacal light, and solar spectra.
In January, 1967, Hermann Brück, Astronomer Royal for Scotland, first proposed the construction of a Northern Hemisphere Observatory (NHO) equipped with a 150-inch telescope. Exactly two years later, a committee under Fred Hoyle convened to examine the feasibility of such an undertaking, and by mid-1971 the project was in the planning stage.
The choice of a site was strongly influenced by Merle Walker of Lick Observatory and his extensive investigation of the factors determining good observing conditions. Walker developed the technique of examining trails of circumpolar stars as a means of measuring the steadiness of the Earth’s atmosphere. He carried out such observations at sites around the world.
Early in 1971 he wrote that “the best seeing occurs at sites on peaks near sea-coasts having cold ocean currents offshore that reduce the height of the [temperature] inversion layer, and where the laminar air-flow set up over the ocean still persists” (Walker, 1971). And he also concluded that “mountain peaks on (small) islands in warm oceans may be good sites, provided that the peaks are sufficiently high to place the observer above the inversion layer…” The importance of an inversion layer is that clouds get trapped below it, leaving clear skies above. On the basis of all the available evidence, Walker produced a list of potentially favourable observing sites that included Tenerife and its near neighbour La Palma, as well as Madeira, Corsica, and Crete.
As is often the case in scientific endeavours, several people reached the same conclusion simultaneously. Walker was not alone in recognizing the Canary Islands’ potential. In 1971, John Alexander of the Royal Greenwich Observatory was investigating possible observing locations in the Mediterranean area, and his quest took him to La Palma in April 1971. His report, published later the same year, stated: “The ideal solution may be an international observatory site on the island of La Palma.”
Moreover, European solar observers, joining in an association known as JOSO (Joint Organization for Solar Observations) visited Tenerife in 1971 March, and on their second visit in November 1971, flew in a light aircraft over the mountain top of La Palma testing for atmospheric turbulence with temperature sensors. The possible sites on La Palma were inspected by several JOSO site testers in summer and autumn 1971. The highest point at El Roque de Los Muchachos (2426 m) was selected as a possible site.
The first observations on La Palma
The first astronomical (solar) observations on the Roque de Los Muchachos peak were carried out by a JOSO team consisting of Göran Hosinsky, Lars Staveland and Hubertus Wöhl from 2 to 21 July 1972 (Hosinsky, Staveland and Wöhl, 1972).
The British site-testing teams were dispatched to Tenerife and La Palma in 1972 under the direction of the Royal Observatory Edinburgh (ROE). The survey on Tenerife was made at the well-developed site of the Observatorio del Teide. Conditions on La Palma were very different. Rising to almost 8,000 feet at its highest point – called Roque de Los Muchachos – the caldera’s rim is a desolate region of scrub vegetation and volcanic ash. The site under investigation was Fuente Nueva, a small peak on the northern edge of the caldera adjacent to the Roque. The survey took place in August and September, 1972. This is an extract of probably one of the first publications with data taken at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory (B McInnes, 1974)
“The main work of the Project in the Canary Islands was done on the island of Tenerife; it seemed desirable to have some information also from the island of La Palma. A visit was made to the island during 1972 July 11 to 14 and decisions were made about the observational work that could easily be done there at that time. Dr Gough and Mr Heath then assembled the necessary equipment in Tenerife for a temporary outstation. They arrived at La Palma on July 28 with the Station 3 Land Rover carrying the equipment; construction work and transportation of the equipment to the site occupied the next few days; the observations began there on August 6 and ended on September 24. The highest point of the island is Roque de los Muchachos (2,423 metres, 7,949 feet). The site chosen for the observations was a peak called Fuente Nueva, situated about one kilometre north-east of Roque de Los Muchachos […] This site was selected by Dr Gough in the expectation that there might be a more favourable airflow there than at the higher Roque de Los Muchachos, since the prevailing wind is from the north and there is a fairly uniform slope with a gradient of about 1 in 4 from Fuente Nueva down to the coast, which is about 9 kilometres (5.5 miles) to the north. Observations of the seeing were made using a Lick Polaris Trail Telescope, which was mounted on a pier constructed of concrete blocks and local rocks cemented together. The objective of the Polaris Trail Telescope was about 4 metres (13 feet) above the general ground level. In general, seeing observations were made each hour during the night and meteorological observations were made at the beginning of each seeing observation. The air temperature was read from an accurate sheathed thermometer which was housed in a louvered box. The wind speed was measured with a hand-held anemometer, held at about the height of the telescope objective. The wind direction was obtained from a wind vane which was mounted at about 5 metres (16 feet) above the general ground level. Since there was no road to the site, access was on foot, with mules to carry equipment and supplies, and the observers were housed in small tents. The walk from the nearest vehicle road to the site took between two and three hours.”
The results of this preliminary testing campaign were analyzed by Walker and Bennet McInnes of ROE and published in 1974. Their conclusion was that the “seeing conditions at Izaña, while good, were not excellent.” On the other hand, reports from Fuente Nueva “indicate conditions as good or better than those known at any other site.” Additional factors, such as the number of clear hours and the lack of light or atmospheric pollution singled out the La Palma site as being exceptional. The JOSO came to a similar conclusion. Professor Kiepenheuer of the Fraunhofer Institut in Freiburg, Germanyand JOSO leader became an enthusiastic advocate of La Palma at this time.
The mid 70’s Site Testing
In 1974 August the Spanish authorities issued an invitation to form a Joint Astronomical Site Survey to undertake an international programme of site testing on the Canary Islands. A momentous meeting took place in 1974 December, when representatives of Denmark, Sweden, Germany and the United Kingdom were invited by the Rector of the University of La Laguna and the Presidents of the local Governments (Cabildos) of Tenerife and La Palma to discuss arrangements for the survey programme. Meanwhile, arrangements had already been made for the setting up of Polaris trail telescopes and meteorological equipment on La Palma and observations began on 25 November 1974 and ended in November1975 .
This encouraging progress came after a period of deep pessimism about the prospects for agreement on the use of La Palma. At the sixth meeting of the NHO Planning Committee in May 1973, Sir Martin Ryle complained about the lack of progress and suggested that UK universities could themselves move faster and more effectively both on the international and the technical questions. Dr M J Smith, who acted as a consultant to the Planning Committee, reported on Hawaii as almost the only possible site. Testing on Madeira (Ecumeada Alta peak) as an alternative started in October 1973. Spanish sites were no longer to be considered.
Recovery from this deep gloom obviously depended on international politics, but it appears that several personal initiatives were also partially responsible. In March 1974 Prof S Edwards (Chairman of SRC) and Prof M F Walker visited the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) in Madrid and discussed the problem with Prof Masía, who was already well known for his help in international scientific affairs. Walker followed this visit with another in June. Prof F Sánchez, Director of the Observatory in Tenerife, had been encouraging the CSIC, the University and the local authorities to issue a joint invitation. A senior Spanish astronomer, Padre Romaña, was also active in overcoming the various political problems.
At the meeting of December 1974, representatives of the various countries involved: Prof K O Kiepenheuer (Germany), Prof A A Wyller (Sweden), Dr K Gyldenkerne (Denmark), Prof H A Brück and F G Smith (UK) were shown the La Palma site from a light aircraft. F H Smith wrote: “A small hut with the waving figures of two site testers was the only sign of human activity on what is now a major European observatory. The weather was good and we were assured that this was typical. Everyone felt that this must be the site for the new observatory” (F G Smith, 1985). From that time onwards there was intensive action on three fronts: site testing, telescope design and the necessary international agreements. (see site tester’s notes, Rein Bakker, on their work on site).
The meeting of 1974 December also revealed the intention of the Spanish astronomers and authorities to provide the basic facilities, ie a road, electrical power and water for the new observatory site. The project was to be regarded from the start as a cooperative venture, with the overseas participants providing telescope time and training for research astronomers in return for the use of the site and its facilities. The formal agreements necessary to secure the rights and specify the duties of the international participants were formulated two years later, when Prof Primo, President of the CSIC, invited representatives of research institutes in the various countries involved to Madrid.
Planning the telescopes
The correct choice of instruments at an observatory is almost as important as its site. Observing time on large telescopes is notoriously oversubscribed. To devote all the available resources to a single large instrument would preclude observations that could be made with a smaller telescope. Thus, to make the best use of a good site requires the construction of a number of instruments of different apertures.
The idea of building a very large reflector for faint-object work was retained. However, difficulties are always encountered in constructing efficient auxiliary devices, such as spectrographs, if the primary mirror is too large. As a result, it was determined that an aperture of about 180 inches (4.5 metres) was the optimum size.
Upon investigating the availability of a suitable mirror, it was found that Owens-Illinois already had a 165-inch (4.2 metre) Cervit disk in stock. This was the last of a batch of blanks that included the primaries for the 3.9-metre Anglo-Australian Telescope and the Cerro Tololo 4-metre telescope. Each successive disk formed from the same mould came out slightly larger than its predecessor.
The option of using a different ceramic material, Zerodur, was discarded due to its high production cost (Goodsell, 1977), and slicing Owen’s blank to a 12 diameter-to-thickness ratio mirror, althoug feasible, was also discarded due to design constraints (Pope, 1978). A study of deflection and stress of this mirror was then carried out for the subsequent design of the supporting system (Mack, 1980).
Therefore economic and technical considerations led to the choice of the 4.2m blank for what was to become known as the William Herschel Telescope. In addition, the same reasoning suggested that an altazimuth mounting was appropiate for such a telescope. This decision reduced the weight of the mounting by 120 tons and halved the height of the dome needed.
While the WHT was being designed, new developments and ideas on telescope design came into the scene and as a consequence the design of the WHT was revised. After assesing all the possible options, it was decided to stay at the original design (Graham Smith, 1979) and purchase Owen Illinois’ blank.
In order to switch from primary focus to secondary mirro and avoid setting up a big crane to change the whole top end of the telescope, a novedous rotating top end ring was conceived (Pope, 1982).
Spectroscopy has been, and is certain to remain, one of the principal tools of astrophysical research. Very high resolution spectroscopy can be carried out efficiently with an instrument smaller in size than the Herschel. This type of work is well suited to a 100-inch telescope. Thus, it was decided to move the Isaac Newton Telescope from its cloudy Sussex home, while upgrading it with a new 100-inch Zerodur mirror, an improved mounting, and a large Coudé spectrograph (see the article “Castle in the Sky � The Story of the Royal Greenwich Observatory at Herstmonceux” by Chas Parker for more information on the already working Isaac Newton Telescope).
The third and smallest telescope at the NHO was to be a dual-purpose 1-metre reflector of novel design. The optics, devised by Charles Harmer and Charles Wynne of RGO, give the telescope a 1.5 degrees flat field for astrometric work. But, by removing a corrector and changing the secondary mirror, the system becomes a conventional Cassegrain for photometry or spectroscopy. Overall responsibility for the NHO project was put in the hands of the Royal Greenwich Observatory.
The proposals for these three telescopes were accepted by the Science Research Council in November 1974; planning and design started at RGO immediately. The project team at RGO was headed by Mr W. A. Goodsell, the chief telescope designer was Mr J. D. Pope, and the Project Scientist was Mr G. A. Harding.
Partnership: The Netherlands and Ireland
As the design of the telescopes and domes progressed, it became clear that the costs of building, maintaining and improving the ING would be too high for UK resources alone. So two options were considered, either reducing the scale of the UK installations or finding international partners who could help both with money and with manpower. Fortunately two such partners were found.
Dutch colleagues had already helped with site testing and they were aware of a forward-looking plan in which they hoped to build or gain access to new large telescopes overseas. The architect of the plan was Prof H van der Laan. At the IAU General Assembly in Montreal (1977) a basis for mutual advantage was worked out, and a momentous agreement was signed on 18June 1981 between the Netherlands Organisatie voor Zuiver-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (ZWO) and the UK SRC on cooperation in astronomy. Dutch colleagues became full partners, contributing both in cash and in manpower in proportion to the astronomical manpower in each country. The addition of 20% to the budget, with the addition of manpower to help commission the telescopes and to undertake the design and construction of instruments, allowed the project to continue undiminished. This partnership is symbolised by the naming of the 1-m telescope as the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope. The collaboration is supervised by the Joint Steering Committee.
The Director of Dunsink Observatory, Prof P A Wayman, provided the introduction to the second partnership. It happened that the arrangements for Irish astronomers to use the Boyden Observatory in South Africa were terminating and it also happened that the Dunsink astronomers were particularly interested in the kind of astronomy that could be done with the new 1-m telescope. The result was an agreement between the Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies and the SRC, whereby Ireland would pay a proportion of the costs in return for observing time. Technical help would also be provided by Dunsink; this agreement was immediately put into action with great benefit to the UK instrument designers.
La Palma is chosen
Analysis of all the testing data revealed clearly that Mauna Kea and Fuente Nueva were the best astronomical sites known. The difference between the two was slight. For example, the seeing was better than 1 arc second 36 percent of the time on Mauna Kea and 40 percent for La Palma. The two really significant drawbacks of the Hawaiian site for the British were the problems that observers would suffer from its much greater altitude and its distance from Europe. So, after many years searching, La Palma was finally chosen.
On 26 May, 1979, almost 10 years after the first committee met to consider a Northern Hemisphere Observatory, a treaty governing its establishment was signed (The “Acuerdo Internacional en Materia de Astrofísica”, BOE, 161, 6 July 1979). Spain agreed to let Denmark, Sweden, and Britain build on La Palma, in exchange for 20 percent of the observing time.
On the Spanish side, a major reorganization of astronomical research had led to the founding of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC) under the directorship of Francisco Sánchez. The IAC owns and operates on behalf of Spain the Izaña observatory and the new site on La Palma – now officially known as the Roque de Los Muchachos Observatory.
The Danish contribution is the Carlsberg Automatic Transit Circle. The Swedes wanted to build a 60-cm stellar telescope and a solar tower with a 60-cm heliostat and 44-cm Cassegrain. In fact, construction of these installations started within days of the treaty’s signing.
Photos of the construction and erection of the ING telescopes can be found here:
Pollution of the night sky
It’s interesting to note that since the beginning astronomers were concerned about conserving the good Palmeran sky conditions. The following is a good example of the latter (Gietzen, 1982): “One of the reasons for selecting La Palma as the site for the installation of the UK’s major optical telescopes was the comparitively minor interference with the quality of the night sky by urban lighting and overflying aircraft. Any increase in either of these factors will lead almost inevitably to a reduction in the observational utility of the site[…].
I would like co-operation in identifying ‘early warnings’ in order that action may in some instaces be started sooner.
There are two areas where every one can contribute:
1) I would like to be informed of any reports, whether in newspapers or elsewhere, of possible future increases in the level of artificial lighting in the island.
2) I would also like to start a record of the incidence of aircraft vapour trails in the vicinity of the site. Reports to be included in this would include date and time of observation and position and direction in at least crude terms. Regular visitors to the site are requested to co-operate in this.”
In 1988 the Spanish Government approved the Sky Law in order to protect the Palmeran sky. The Oficina para la Protección del Cielo was then set up.
Name of the British telescopes on La Palma
At the meeting of the International Scientific Committee on Tenerife on 25 May 1984, Alec Boksenberg announced that the 1 metre telescope had been named the Kapteyn Telescope after Jacobus Kapteyn, the Dutch astronomer. The name was appropiate since he had worked on problems of galactic structure similar to those which the telescope was expected to attack. He also announced that the interim name UK Optical Telescopes woud be replaced by the name Isaac Newton Group. In the 1960’s Britain’s biggest telescope was named after the British scientist most highly regarded in the world. In the 1980’s its best collection of telescopes continued to commemorate this man (Murdin, 1984).
The royal inauguration
The observatory on La Palma was inaugurated by seven heads of state, or their representatives, on 29 June 1985. Attending were King Juan Carlos of Spain, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Queen Margrethe of Denmark, King Gustav of Sweden, the Presidents of West Germany and of Ireland, and the Duke of Gloucester representing Queen Elizabeth of the United Kingdom. After ceremonies and banquets on Tenerife on June 28, the royal party and the guests flew to La Palma on the morning of the 29th, to ascend to the Roque de los Muchachos in perfect weather. The heads of state travelled from telescope to telescope, dedicating each in front of a small audience. The main ceremony, inaugurating the whole observatory, took place in a large open-air auditorium. The audience included royal guests, astronomers, engineers, Nobel Laureates, national and local dignitaries, Spanish, Dutch, Danish, Swedish and British staff on the Roque, civil servants, military officials and media representatives, in a gathering in which protocol played a relatively minor part. Other events on the island included the opening of the Convent of San Francisco in which there was displayed an exhibition of Hispano-Arabic astronomical instruments and maps, some loaned by the Old Royal Observatory, Greenwich.
spacer