The Ruling elite want CONTROL/DOMINION/POWER and they want it NOW! I would be bad enough if they were only claiming dominion over the human race as in GLOBAL GOVERNMENT. Their avarice reaches far beyond that. Not satisfied even with the concept of ruling the hearts, minds and bodies of all the people on earth, as well as all the Resources of earth they are expanding their domain and seizing authority over the cosmos!
If you doubt it now, you will not doubt it by the end of this post. They have been pondering and tweaking the Kardashev ranking system for Civilizations for years now. It has filled their heads with all manner of fantasy about dominion. Dominion and Godhood!
Their arrogance and hutzpah has reached levels of insanity. It should be obvious to those with eyes to see that these are not humans. These maniacs are either right out descendants of the Nephilim/Fallen Angels or their are possessed by them.
I am not going to tell you about what they believe and what they are doing. I am going to let them and their publications speak for themselves.
These folks are tools of Satan. Yet, there is no doubt in my mind that God is still on the thrown and using these madmen for HIS purpose.
spacer
A TYPE ONE CIVILIZATION (a BUCK ROGERS TYPE OF SYSTEM) THIS TYPE OF CIVILIZATION HAS HARNESSED IT’S PLANETARY POWER, THEY CONTROL EARTHQUAKES, THE WEATHER, VOLCANOES. THEY HAVE CITIES ON THE OCEAN. ANYTHING PLANETARY THEY CONTROL.
That is TYPE 1.
MACHINES. EVENTUALLY, THEY EXHAUST THE POWER OF THE STAR, AND THEY GO GALACTIC. THEY HARNESS THE POWER OF BILLIONS OF STARS IN A GALAXY..A TYPE THREE CIVILIZATION (EMPIRE FROM STAR WARS) POWERED BY BILLIONS OF STARS.
According to Michio Kaku we are not even civilized. We are a type 0 civilization. We aren’t even on the scale. That is why “science” is racing so hard to make us a type 1. He admit that they cannot find ANY evidence of a Type 3 Civilization anywhere. Truth is, they can’t find a Type 2 either. HE IS FULL OF GARBAGE. These “scientists” are indeed MAD!
Let’s find out more about what all that means for us.
spacer
What If We Become a Type 1 Civilization?
spacer
Though Kardashev’s initial theory only had 3 levels, scientists have expounded on his theory both in the details of those 3 Types but by adding additional levels. So far they are up to type 7.
spacer
What if We Become a Type 7 Civilization?
spacer
I was curious as to what EXACTLY Kardashev state in his original work.
spacer
Whenever we’re audacious enough to categorize far future civilizations, we turn to the work of Nikolai Kardashev. Nick Nielsen today looks at the well known Kardashev scale in the light of a curious fact: While many use Kardashev’s rankings in their own speculations, few have gone back and dug into his original paper. In Kardashev’s terms, our planet is close to attaining Type I status, which would surprise many commentators. And doesn’t the ambiguity over what constitutes the energy of a star — red dwarf? red giant? — play havoc with cut and dried ‘type’ definitions? How subsequent writers have adapted and modified the Kardashev scale makes for a cautionary tale about mastering our sources before using them for further extrapolation. For that matter, are there better gauges of a civilization than its use of particular energy resources? Answering the question deepens the debate that Kardashev so fruitfully began.
by J. N. Nielsen
The name of Nikolai S. Kardashev is synonymous with the Kardashev ranking of civilizations according to their energy profile, and probably will be so synonymous as long as human civilization (or some successor institution) endures.
Kardashev is a radio astronomer and among the pioneers of SETI, and his idea of classifying civilizations according to their ability to harness energy was directly related to his experience in radio telescopy (Kardashev asked himself how powerful an extraterrestrial radio signal would have to be in order to be detected, “by conventional radio astronomical techniques.” [1] The numbers he came up with were quite high, and this furnished the basis of his tripartite division of civilizations into Type I, Type II, and Type III.
If a civilization could radiate EM spectrum emissions at the energy levels of naturally-occurring astronomical radio sources, such a civilization could be detected as easily as we detect pulsars, radio galaxies, and the like. For a civilization to radiate at such levels of energy, however, would require technological capacities beyond our current abilities. Kardashev notes his Type II and Type III civilizations could radiate at such high energy levels, and although we could not match these levels, we could receive these signals. He also suggests that known astronomical radio sources could have an artificial origin. Thus from a Kardashevian perspective, the existential risk of METI is negligible, as only very advanced and powerful civilizations would be able to transmit to the universe at large, while younger, less advanced, and therefore more vulnerable civilizations are restricted to passive listening, for all practical purposes.
spacer
 |
|
Mission | METI International |
spacer
Sometimes the discussion of Kardashev civilization types seems to become a little too casual, and, like the sailors on the Pequod who each look into the gold doubloon nailed to the mast and see themselves and their personal concerns mirrored within, writers on the possibility of extraterrestrial civilizations (and especially speculation on supercivilizations) tend to read their preoccupations into Kardashev’s types without being much concerned with what Kardashev himself actually wrote about this. While many writers have parsed the Drake equation with painstaking attention to detail, I find it remarkable that no one seems to have done this for Kardashev, instead seeming to prefer impressionistic renderings of Kardashev’s civilization types.
Here is Kardashev’s original formulation of the three types of civilizations he recognized:
I – technological level close to the level presently attained on the earth, with energy consumption at ~4 x 1019 erg/sec.
II – a civilization capable of harnessing the energy radiated by its own star (for example, the stage of successful construction of a “Dyson sphere”); energy consumption at ~4 x 1033 erg/sec.
III – a civilization in possession of energy on the scale of its own galaxy, with energy consumption at ~4 x 1044 erg/sec. [1]
Note that there is an ambiguity of the Kardashev metric in terms of actual vs. comparable energy usage. A carefully constructivist account of Kardashev would insist that a Type II civilization is “a civilization capable of harnessing the energy radiated by its own star,” and that all of this energy must in fact come from that particular star and from no other source. In other words, given a strict conception of a Type II civilization, a civilization utilizing energy quantitatively equivalent to but not identical to the actual energy produced by a single star would not constitute a Type II civilization. Actual and equivalent energy use are very different measures, and Kardashev himself uses both formulations (type II is “energy radiated by its own star” while type III is “energy on the scale of its own galaxy”).
Image: Russian radio astronomer and SETI theorist Nikolai Kardashev.
Moreover, in defining a type II civilization as, “harnessing the energy radiated by its own star” (a definition which is, I must observe, impredicative, because it defines an individual in terms of a whole of which it is a part) [3], Kardashev introduces an ambiguity due to the fact that there are stars of many different luminosities and temperatures. Generally speaking, the largest stars burn very hot, are very bright, and burn themselves out relatively quickly, while small stars are much dimmer and endure much longer. Brown dwarfs will likely outlast almost all other stars.
One of the persistent themes we find in commentaries on Kardashev’s civilization types is that our terrestrial civilization is not yet a type I civilization, but this isn’t at all what Kardashev said. In fact, it is the opposite of what Kardashev said, as he specified for a Type I civilization a, “technological level close to the level presently attained on the earth.” Kardashev did not say what “close” means in this context.
For the past decade, global energy consumption has been increasing at an average rate of 2.3 percent per year – more growth in years of economic growth or difficult winters, less in years of recession and mild winters. Roughly, this means that global energy consumption will double every thirty years, so that since the time Kardashev wrote his paper, global energy consumption is well on its way to quadrupling. So for those who say that we are still short of what Kardashev called a Type I civilization in 1964, even if we were a little short of the mark at that time, we ought to be well past the mark by now.
But this only scratches the surface of the kind of impressionistic readings of Kardashev that are common. Here is an example from George Basalla:
“A Type I Kardashev civilization is similar to the modern technological societies found on Earth. It draws upon the energy falling upon a planet from its sun. Kardashev estimated the Earth’s energy consumption at about 4 x 1019 ergs per second. The Earth has not quite reached Type I status because its inhabitants are unable to capture all of the radiant energy streaming down upon it. For this reason, Carl Sagan said that the Earth was more accurately called a Type .7 civilization.” [5]
This is an entirely reasonable extrapolation of Kardashev, but it is an imaginative reconstruction of Kardashev rather than an explication and application of the principles implicit in the exposition of his civilization types. The passage to which Basalla alludes in from Sagan’s The Cosmic Connection: An Extraterrestrial Perspective:
“The energy gap between a Type I and a Type II civilization or between a Type II and a Type III civilization is enormous – a factor of about ten billion in each instance. It seems useful, if the matter is to be considered seriously, to have a finer degree of discrimination. I would suggest Type 1.0 as a civilization using 1016 watts for interstellar communication; Type 1.1, 1017 watts; Type 1.2, 1018 watts, and so on. Our present civilization would be classed as something like Type 0.7.” [6]
Sagan’s interpretation provided a template for many other interpretations. Here is another example, from David Lamb:
“Type I would have a similar technological level to Earth, using 6.6 × 1012 watts. This civilization could engage in something akin to the present power output of Earth for the purpose of interstellar communication. Type I civilizations would have the power to restructure entire planets.” [7]
This is closer to the spirit of Kardashev’s original exposition, since it focuses on the use of energy for interstellar radio communication, but, again, this is not how Kardashev formulated his types. Kardashev wrote of a civilization in possession of energy levels of, “4 x 1033 erg/sec. or more, which it is capable of transmitting in a coded isotropic radio-frequency signal, may be detected by conventional radio astronomical technique,” which is the energy he attributes to Type II civilizations, and he is clear in the body of his paper that it would be Type II and Type III civilizations that would be transmitting, and Type I civilizations, like ourselves, who would be listening.
Michio Kaku is even more imaginative than Sagan and others in drawing out the implications of Kardashev’s civilization types as he sees them. For example, here is how Kaku defines a Type I civilization:
“Type I civilizations: those that harvest planetary power, utilizing all the sunlight that strikes their planet. They can, perhaps, harness the power of volcanoes, manipulate the weather, control earthquakes, and build cities on the ocean. All planetary power is within their control.” [8]
Kaku goes into much more detail in Chapter 8, “The Future of Humanity,” in his book Physics of the Future [9], most of which chapter is an exposition of Kaku’s interpretation and extrapolation of Kardashev civilization types.
There is something intuitively attractive and plausible about equating a type I civilization with planetary energy resources, a type II civilization with stellar energy resources, and a type III civilization with galactic energy resources, and it would further be intuitively attractive and plausible to equate planetary energy resources with the burning of fossil fuels that are the result of a planetary biosphere (and are not to be derived from stars and are not found in space). This is Kaku’s approach. But this is not what Kardashev said.
The ideas of Sagan, Kaku and others for a typology of civilizations are worthwhile, but they aren’t what Kardashev said. Nevertheless, as the idea of Kardashev civilization types becomes further elaborated, many writers routinely refer to Kardashev types, but this only compounds the ambiguity because one never knows if they are referring to what Kardashev actually said, or to subsequent embroidering upon what Kardashev said. And it is a different that makes a difference. If we cannot be clear about what we mean, we will only engender more confusion the more we say.
Kardashev concluded his famous paper with this reflection:
“…we should like to note that the estimates arrived at here are unquestionably of no more than a tentative nature. But all of them bear witness to the fact that, if terrestrial civilization is not a unique phenomenon in the entire universe, then the possibility of establishing contacts with other civilizations by means of present-day radio physics capabilities is entirely realistic.” [1]
These are the sage words of a scientist who expects (or at least hopes) that others will take up his work and expand upon it. Tentative formulations invite others to revise and extend them, and certainly many have sought to do this with Kardashev’s civilization types. I don’t wish to suggest that the extrapolations and extensions of Kardashev’s idea are illegitimate, only that they aren’t at all what Kardashev said, and we ought to be clear about this.
However we choose to interpret and extrapolate Kardashev, we need to accustom ourselves to thinking as rigorously about civilization as we do about science (or, at least, make the attempt to do so) so that all those who think about SETI, METI, extraterrestrial civilizations, and astrobiology, inter alia, will not be derisively dismissed as being in the realm of “science fiction” – and I trust a good many of my readers have felt the sting of this charge when trying to discuss such matters in a careful and rational manner.
This rigor is eminently within our grasp, but in order to do justice to it (and therefore to do justice to the ideas of extraterrestrial civilizations and supercivilizations) we must take care in our formulations to refine them to the fullest extent possible. Aristotle famously began his Nicomachean Ethics with the observation that, “…it is the mark of an educated man to require, in each kind of inquiry, just so much exactness as the subject admits of: it is equally absurd to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician, and to demand scientific proof from an orator.” [14] The study of extraterrestrial civilization, and of civilization simpliciter, does not yet admit of the degree of exactness of mathematics, but it is to be hoped that it admits to a greater degree of exactness than oratory. It is our responsibility to make it so.
spacer
Though they talk about the Civilization Types is an established fact, we find it is purely conjecture. Never meant to hold the place of reverence it has been given. It was just loosely developed concept whish was an estimation of what level of development a civilization would have to reach before it would be capable of reaching out across space to other civilizations.
There is no evidence that ANY civilization exists ANYWHERE in space. Meanwhile, other have come behind Kardashev and compounded upon his theory carrying it to ridiculous exaggeration. I believe that particularly Michio Kaka and likely many like him see their version of the Classification of Civilizations plays into their “science” fantasies and feed their ego.
I included this in my post so that you could get an idea of the extremes that these maniacs can reach. The elite seem to be hell bent on becoming Gods by taking total control not only over our civilization, but the cosmos.
Let’s take a look at some of the ideas that have developed in order to reach their goal.
spacer
spacer
In the above video we learned that in order for the elite to reach their goal of becoming a Type 1 Civilization, they believe they must massively increase the level of energy they can create. That is the reason for all the madness. It has nothing to do with powering the internet, saving the planet, or providing for humanity. It is all about, becoming GODS.
Filling the earth with millions of diamond balls.
spacer
Harvard Scientists Think Filling The Sky With Diamond Dust Could Cool Down The Planet
SPACE29 October 2015
Tomertu/Shutterstock.comGlobal warming is having a significant impact on our planet, and researchers are constantly trying to come up with ways that we can limit this gradual rise in temperature. One alternative to curbing activities that warm the planet is to find measures that cool it instead.
Known as geo-engineering, the concept has inspired a bunch of global ‘hacks’ that could help stall the climb in temperature and encourage it to drop instead – some of which are more plausible than others. And now a team at Harvard University has come up with the most dramatic planet hack yet: flinging tonnes of alumina and diamond particles into the atmosphere to cool down Earth.
|
Alumina | chemical compound | Britannica |
|
Alumina Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster| |
|
alum | Etymology, origin and meaning of alum by etymonline |
The proposal builds on an earlier idea of pumping sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere – an approach that would theoretically mimic the effects of volcanic eruptions. We know that these eruptions and the large amounts of sulphur dioxide they create can rapidly cool the surrounding regions of the planet, so could the same result be achieved artificially?
Powdered diamond is likely to be a lot safer and kinder to the ozone layer than sulphate aerosols, the new study suggests. After all, while volcanic eruptions might help to cool down the planet, they aren’t generally known for being kind to the environment in any other sense. The new method is also less likely to heat up the lower stratosphere, which has the potential to result in some unwanted atmospheric side-effects.
(Did you catch all that? The plan they originally were going to use, financed by Bill Gates, obviously was not going to be good for the environment for multiple reasons. Yet they were ready to implement it, because they don’t really care about the environment. Global warming is a hoax created by their weather control geo-engineering.)
At the moment, the scientists behind the new report aren’t completely sure about their theory, but they hope to conduct more research in the future to get a better idea of what the benefits could be. While we know plenty about volcanic eruptions, we know hardly anything about the difference that alumina and diamond particles could make in the atmosphere.
“Our paper is really geared towards removing the mindset that it has to be sulphate that’s used to do solar radiation management,” says Debra Weisenstein, one of the study’s authors. “[Alumina and diamond dust] could have significantly less impact on ozone, less heating of the stratosphere and less of an increase in diffuse light at Earth’s surface.”
Diamond dust is expensive of course, which is another potential problem, but the Harvard team thinks that the price would eventually come down enough to make the idea viable. That’s certainly a possibility if the process to make synthetic diamonds becomes quicker and easier than it is now. The team says by the time the world’s population reaches 10 billion in the year 2065 (or close to it), it would cost around $5 per person to send 450,000 tonnes of the nanoparticles into space.
They don’t give any specifics about how they came to those figures or what will bring down the cost. Since they are talking about blue diamonds, do they plan to use all the dead bodies to make the diamonds?
The study has been published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
spacer
Scientists Find ‘Quadrillions’ of Tons of Diamonds Beneath Earth’s Surface
Unfortunately, the diamonds are buried so deep we’ll probably never mine them.
BY 
Mina De La O//Getty Images
Deep beneath the Earth’s surface, there’s a gigantic cache of diamonds, according to new research. While it’s unlikely that we’ll ever be able to obtain these diamonds, knowing that they’re there helps us learn more about our own planet and what it’s made of.
To discover what lies beneath the surface, scientists can’t simply look with their eyes. Instead, they use sound waves and listen. Unlike light, sound can travel through solid rock, and by listening closely scientists can learn a great deal about what the inside of the Earth is like.
Typically, these sounds come from earthquakes or volcanic explosions, and by studying the resulting seismic waves scientists can determine what materials lie underground. One group of scientists was studying a strange anomaly that occurs when these seismic waves pass through underground structures called cratonic roots. These structures are ancient, highly dense rock formations shaped like inverted mountains that lie hundreds of miles beneath most tectonic plates.
To figure out what exactly these roots were made of, the researchers created a series of computer simulations using hypothetical rocks made of different materials. Of all the different simulations they tested, the only one that agreed with the data was a simulation where the cratonic roots were made of about one to two percent diamond, in addition to ordinary rock.
This discovery is a big deal because cratonic roots make up a significant fraction of our planet’s crust. If even two percent of these structures are made of diamond, that equals quadrillions of tons of the mineral buried under the surface. Unfortunately, cratonic roots are located around a hundred miles underground, so mining expeditions seem unlikely.
“This shows that diamond is not perhaps this exotic mineral, but on the [geological] scale of things, it’s relatively common,” said Faul. “We can’t get at them, but still, there is much more diamond there than we have ever thought before.”
spacer
spacer
Blue diamonds are among the rarest of gems. Blue diamonds are not just extremely rare, but also very pure, Smith reports. “They’re quite often completely flawless.” That made it difficult for researchers to identify enough blue diamonds with mineral inclusions to study.
It may sound a bit dark, but it’s now possible to transform the ashes of the cremated deceased into a diamond-a jewel truly to remember.
Using “Russian technology,” Algordanza Memorial Diamonds are created in a similar fashion to the way natural diamonds are formed.
Here’s how it works: a diamond is composed of pressurized carbons. Conveniently enough, human bodies are about 18 percent carbon. Using about a pound of ashes, the company is able to distill out the carbon and use it to form a man-made diamond in a mold under high pressure in about a week. These synthetic diamonds created this way are often blue because of certain chemicals in the human body.
Algordanza, headquartered in Switzerland, offers a variety of diamond sizes and cuts that can be placed on a ring or other jewelry pieces. Prices run higher than conventional diamonds, starting from about $3,000 depending on the size and cut.
spacer
|
algor – noun
|
|
Algorithm Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster |
|
Danza – Wikipedia |
spacer
The resulting diamond will be “an everlasting keepsake, remembrance, or heirloom to pass to future generations,” Frank Ripka, CTO of Algordanza, told BusinessInsider.
It is also becoming crucial for diamond sellers to be able to distinguish between those that have come from mines, known as natural diamonds, and the growing number of diamonds produced by machines, known as lab-grown diamonds.
The technology for producing lab-grown diamonds is improving all the time, and they are a fast-growing section of the market.
But natural diamonds are considerably more expensive than lab-grown gems, so it is important to have a reliable way of telling them apart. Source
Lab grown diamonds are diamonds that have been “grown” in a controlled laboratory setting. They’re comprised of the same chemical components you’ll find in natural diamonds (carbon atoms arranged in a specific pattern) but instead of being formed deep in the earth’s crust, lab made diamonds are created in a laboratory. Because lab grown diamonds are chemically the same as natural earth made diamonds, they are virtually indistinguishable in terms of appearance, quality and durability.
Lab grown diamond technology for industrial uses has been around for over 50 years, but within the last decade there have been impressive developments in quality and price, meaning these lab grown stones can now be used in jewellery, too.
How Are Lab Grown Diamonds Made?
The science behind lab created diamonds has advanced in recent years, making it possible for specialized laboratories to create stunning diamonds. It all starts with a seed diamond, which is typically a small lab grown diamond. From there, the seed will either undergo Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) or High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) processes to create the completed lab diamond.
In CVD lab diamond creation, the small seed diamond is placed into a plasma reactor chamber where a mixture of carbon-rich gases is added at a low pressure. Then, microwaves are used to heat the gases and generate plasma. As the temperature climbs over several thousand degrees, the gas molecules break apart which makes way for carbon atoms to bond to the seed one layer at a time. As the layers build, the CVD lab creation process produces a complete diamond.
The HPHT method takes another approach to creating diamonds in the laboratory, following a controlled process that mimics the conditions in which diamonds form naturally. HPHT diamonds start with the same seed diamond, but things change from there. With HPHT diamonds, the seed is placed in a large mechanical press along with a carbon starting material. The press applies high pressure coupled with high temperatures, resulting in extreme conditions for the carbon starting material. The material’s carbon soon separates and finds its way to the cooler diamond seed, resulting in new layers of carbon forming to grow the diamond in size. This causes more layers of the diamond to form. The seed diamond acts as a guide for the lattice of carbon that will soon become the completed diamond, guiding the new layers of carbon to form a complete diamond. This lab diamond process is closest to the conditions in which earth created diamonds are formed.
Both CVD and HPHT diamonds can take several weeks or months to be created in a laboratory. The exact amount of time will depend on the diamond’s size, colour and additional features.
What Is The Difference Between Lab Grown And Simulated Diamonds?
Unlike lab grown diamonds, simulated diamonds are not diamonds. Diamond simulants such as cubic zirconia and moissanite have different chemical compositions compared to a diamond.
Simulants are made from seed materials like glass or cubic zirconia. This fact makes diamond simulants like moissanite lack the hardness and optical properties of lab grown diamonds. As time goes on, simulants become much more susceptible to wear-and-tear and diminished sparkle. Lab made diamonds, on the other hand, are chemically identical to natural diamonds and offer lasting beauty.
Nature recycles trash to create diamonds
The Earth’s deepest diamonds are commonly made up of former living organisms that have effectively been recycled more than 400 kilometers below the surface, new Curtin research has discovered.
The research, published in Nature’s Scientific Reports, found that both diamonds found in oceanic rocks and the so-called super-deep continental diamonds shared a common origin of recycled organic carbon deep within the Earth’s mantle.
Lead author Dr. Luc Doucet, from Curtin’s Earth Dynamics Research Group within the School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said the findings offered a fascinating insight into the world’s most expensive gemstones.
“Bringing new meaning to the old trash to treasure adage, this research discovered that the Earth’s engine actually turns organic carbon into diamonds many hundreds of kilometers below the surface,” Dr. Doucet said.
“Ballooning rocks from the Earth’s deeper mantle, called mantle plumes, then carry the diamonds back up to the Earth’s surface via volcanic eruptions for humans to enjoy as sought-after gemstones.
“While recycling is becoming a modern-day necessity for our sustainable survival, we were particularly surprised to learn, through this research, that Mother Nature has been showing us how to recycle with style for billions of years.”
The three main types of natural diamonds include oceanic, super-deep continental and lithospheric diamonds, formed at different levels of the mantle with a varying mixture of organic and inorganic carbon.
Co-lead author John Curtin Distinguished Professor Zheng-Xiang Li, the Head of the Earth Dynamics Research Group, said the research provided a model that explains the formation and locations of all three major types of diamonds.
“This is the first time that all three major types of diamonds have been linked to mantle plumes, ballooning hot rocks driven by plate tectonics and the supercontinent cycle from deeper Earth,” Professor Li said.
“This research not only helps to understand Earth’s carbon cycle, but also has the potential to unlock more secrets of the Earth’s dynamic history through tracking the past locations of mantle plumes and superplumes. This can be achieved by mapping out the distribution of both continental and oceanic diamonds.”
However, Professor Li said it remained a mystery as to why diamonds formed in the so-called “mantle transition zone,” 400 to 600 kilometers deep, utilized recycled organic carbon only.
“This might have something to do with the physical-chemical environment there,” Professor Li said. “It is not uncommon for a new scientific discovery to raise more questions that require further investigation.
spacer
DIAMONDS AND ALUMINA are not the only particles they want to dump into our atmosphere in the name of GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHANGE.
Sunscreen in the Sky? Reflective Particles May Combat Warming
Titanium dioxide could scatter sunlight and cool Earth, scientist says.
|
Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: a Risk for Human Health? |
|
Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: a Risk for Human Health? |
|
The Hidden Dangers in Your Dietary Supplements | achs.edu |
spacer
Once in the atmosphere, the particles would spread around the planet and reflect some of the sun’s rays back into space.
About three million tons of titanium dioxide—spread into a layer around a millionth of a millimeter thick—would be enough to offset the warming effects caused by a doubling of today’s atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, according to project leader and chemical engineer Peter Davidson.
The idea was inspired by the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, a volcano in the Philippines, said Davidson
spacer
BUT THEIR FAVORITE THINGS TO PUT IN THE SKY ARE MIRRORS! Loads and Loads of MIRRORS. I have talked about this often in my posts
spacer
|
hexagon (n.) Hexagram – Wikipedia |
|
Hexagram – OCCULT WORLD |
|
25 Witchcraft Symbols Everyone Should Know About |
spacer
 |
 |
Night Light
Ben Nowack, a 26-year-old inventor and former SpaceX employee, wants to send satellites with mirrors mounted on them into orbit to allow us to generate solar energy at night, Vice reports.
“Everybody’s installing so many solar panels everywhere,” Nowack told the site. “It’s really a great candidate to power humanity.”
“But sunlight turns off, it’s called nighttime,” he added. “If you solve that fundamental problem, you fix solar everywhere.”
Beaming Solar
Nowack founded Tons of Mirrors, an aptly named venture trying to get orbit-based reflector satellites off the ground.
The big advantage of having the reflectors in space means that “you can shine sunlight on solar farms that already exist,” Nowack told Vice. “Then I developed several more technologies which I know for a fact no one else is working on. That made the model even more economical.”
His concept for a reflector in orbit takes the basic technologies NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope uses, he told the site, and turns them “the other way.”
But instead of relying on one massive and unwieldy mirror, Nowack proposes building a parabola-shaped reflector out of “several million parabolas.”
“Making this cheaper than everything else, that’s the challenge,” Nowack told Vice.
READ MORE: This Man Is Trying to Put Mirrors in Space to Generate Solar Power at Night [Vice]
More on solar power: Amazon Secretly Shut Down All Its Solar Rooftops After They Started Catching Fire
The post Former SpaceX Guy Aims to Launch Giant Mirrors Into Orbit to Shine on Solar Panels at Night appeared first on Futurism.
spacer
The initiative, dubbed Solspace, has just received a €2.5 million ($2.75 million) grant from the European Research Council (ERC) to support five years of research into ways to keep solar power flowing from dusk to dawn. Project ‘SOLSPACE: Enhancing Global Clean Energy Services Using Orbiting Solar Reflectors
SOLSPACE – Orbiting solar reflector concept
The idea seems straightforward: large, ultra-lightweight reflectors in orbit around the planet will reflect sunlight onto large-scale solar power farms still firmly rooted down on Earth, and which will be operating as normal. The reflectors will boost the farms’ output particularly at sunset and sunrise, when energy production reduces due to the lack of light, while demand typically surges.
So, they are talking about making sunshine 24 hours?? I don’t see how it can shine ONLY on solar panels.
With the project still in its infancy, however, there remain many unknowns. The team, for example, is still weighing up whether to deploy small numbers of large reflectors, or large numbers of smaller ones. Some equations also need solving: in order to get the reflector to spot onto a specific solar power farm, the satellites will need to remain fairly low; but a low orbit means it will be harder for the reflector to have simultaneous visibility of both the sun and the power plant – an alignment that is a geometric requirement for the experiment to succeed.
SEE: Digital transformation: A CXO’s guide (ZDNet special report) | Download the report as a PDF (TechRepublic)
“The European Research Council funding is for blue sky research,” Colin McInnes, professor of engineering science at the University of Glasgow, and who founded the Solspace project, told ZDNet. “The delivery of an operational system is clearly many years ahead, but now is the time to explore the technologies that can help underpin the clean energy systems of the future.”
|
MiniLase Plus NEW Product! Industrial Grade Laser Module. MiniLase Plus is the newest member of MiniLase product family from Blue Sky Research. This compact high-performance laser is designed specifically for operation in demanding environments. The MiniLase Plus is ideal for aiming, aligning, and pointing in a wide range of application, such as industrial equipment, biomedical tools, and …
spacer
The term blue sky research comes from Comroe’s retrospectoscope in 1976 on the research done in 1869 on why the sky is blue. This research was initially thought to be of no value but led to many other discoveries of much more direct use. History. Support for blue skies research has varied over time, ultimately becoming subject to the political …
sp
 Basic (or “blue-sky”) research is distinct from applied research, which is targeted toward developing or advancing technologies to solve a specific problem or to create a new product. But the two are deeply connected. “Applied research is exploring the continents you know, whereas basic research is setting off in a ship and seeing where you get,” says Frank Wilczek, a theoretical physicist at MIT. “You might just have to return, or sink at sea, or you might discover a whole new continent. So it’s much more long-term, it’s riskier and it doesn’t always pay dividends.” When it does, he says, it opens up entirely new possibilities available only to those who set sail into uncharted waters. spacer Request information. May 23 2014. ‘Blue sky science’, sometimes known as ‘blue sky research‘ or even just ‘basic research‘, is the name given to scientific research undertaken in fields where the direct benefits and targets – both economic and practical – are either vague or completely unfixed. More colloquially, it is learning through science simply for the sake of learning, in the hope that … we will stumble across some important discoveries, ostensibly by chance.
|
In 2018, solar power delivered 585 TWh globally, which compares to a total energy demand of 157,000 TWh across the world. According to the National Space Society, however, current technologies only make use of a fraction of the solar energy available in space; and the sun’s potential to deliver clean energy is still vastly unexplored.
So, this is a plan to help the elite reach their goal of using ALL the Energy Available from the SUN, moving us up to the Type 1 Civilization, in their eyes.
Unleashing such potential has been the focus of studies around the world for about half a century. Among the early explorers of space-based solar power were the Russians, who in 1993 launched project Znamya, with the idea to use a mirror in space to illuminate points on Earth with light equivalent to that of several full moons.
More recently, Japan unveiled a 15-year plan to turn solar energy in space into useable energy on Earth, but the concept put forward by the country’s researchers differs slightly from the one invented by McInnes. Instead of directing sunlight down to collectors on the surface of the planet, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) is working on launching power stations into space, which would transform sunlight into microwaves while in orbit, before beaming the energy produced back to Earth in the form of a laser. JAXA is aiming to have built a 1GW power station by 2031, and to be launching one power station per year by the late 2030s.
The Chinese government, with the same concept in mind, is hoping to launch a space-based solar power station that can generate at least 1MW of electricity by 2030, and to have a commercial-scale plant in space by the 2050s.
In the past few years, aerospace engineers in Glasgow have also been working on a multinational project to send large power structures into space, to produce solar energy and then send it back to Earth.
The cost of launching objects into orbit is exorbitant enough to explain why sending solar power farms into space is not the new normal just yet. The Solspace project is “quite different,” said McInnes, because most of the power plant infrastructure will remain on the ground; “the space-based infrastructure is only the large, lightweight reflectors,” he added.
SEE: Coronavirus and 3D printing: How makers are stepping up to supply vital medical kit
Launching large reflectors into orbit, no matter how lightweight they are, still comes with costs and technical hurdles; and so, McInnes’s team is researching new methods to build the devices directly in space. One of the technologies that lends itself well to the idea is 3D printing.
“We will be developing methods to fabricate ultra-lightweight reflectors in orbit, which do not have to be packed and then unfolded after the rigours of launch,” said McInnes. “By fabricating the reflectors in orbit, for example by adapting 3D printing technologies, we believe extremely lightweight structures can be deployed.”
NASA has already been testing 3D printers aboard the International Space Station (ISS) to create components and supplies for long-duration missions. Dubbed the “3D print on-demand machine shop” by the organization’s engineers, the technology could drastically reduce both the time and cost of sending objects from Earth to astronauts.
McInnes and his team, for the time being, still have a lot on their plate before Solspace can become a tangible reality. “As well as engineering challenges, we’ll be looking at integration with terrestrial energy systems and economic modelling,” said the researcher.
“But the combination of falling launch costs, in-orbit fabrication methods and future global demand for clean energy makes it timely,” he added. And if successful, McInnes’s space project could significantly boost solar power infrastructure, and clean energy outputs, back on planet Earth.
Space mirrors are satellites that are designed to change the amount of solar radiation that impacts the Earth as a form of climate engineering. Since the conception of the idea in 1923, 1929, 1957 and 1978 by physicist Hermann Oberth[1][2][3][4] and in the 1980s by other scientists, space mirrors have mainly been theorized as a way to deflect sunlight to counter global warming and was seriously considered in the 2000s.[5][6]
These giant mirrors in orbit could be used to illuminate individual cities, as a means of protection against natural disasters, to control weather and climate, to create addional living space for tens of billions of people, Hermann Oberth writes. The fact that one could influence the trajectories of he barometric high and low pressure areas with these spatial mirrors seemed most important to Oberth.
Other scientists proposed in the 1980s to cool Venus’ climate to provide for a theoretical future where humans occupy other planets.[8] In 1989, James Early, working at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, proposed using a “space shade” 2,000 kilometres (1,200 miles) in diameter orbiting at Lagrangian Point L1. He estimated the cost at between one and ten trillion US dollars and suggested manufacturing it on the moon using moon rock.[8]
Space mirrors were also proposed at the “Response Options to Rapid or Severe Climate Change” round-table meeting organized by the President’s Climate Change Technology Program in September 2001. Lowell Wood, a senior staff scientist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory proposed stationing one or more wire-mesh “mirrors” in orbit to deflect sunlight back into space or to filter it. Wood calculated that deflecting 1% of sunlight would restore climatic stability, and that would require either a single mirror 600,000 square miles (1,600,000 km2) in area or several smaller ones. Wood had been researching the idea for more than ten years but considered it so infeasible that it should only be a back-up plan for solving the global warming problem.
In January 2007, The Guardian reported that the US government recommended that research on sunlight deflection, including space mirrors, be continued in line with the next United Nations Report on Climate Change.[9][10] In addition to the space mirror, suggested sunlight-reducing techniques included launching thousands of highly reflective balloons and pumping sulphate droplets into the upper atmosphere to emulate volcanic emissions.[8][9]
Daniel Schrag of Harvard University and David Keith of the University of Calgary organized a climate engineering conference in November 2007. The research community’s consensus was that it was worth studying such ideas further despite their high cost, the doubtful feasibility of some ideas including the space mirror, and the risk of their distracting attention from reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.[11][12]
Unintended climate change
The direct reflection of solar radiation away from the Earth may have certain adverse effects on the climate. As the Earth is exposed to less solar radiation, the planet will cool down, but this might result in unpredictable weather patterns.[14] An overall drop in global temperature may affect the hydrological cycle and could increase the intensity of droughts and floods.[14] Furthermore, the change of temperature and climate may also negatively impact the cultivation of crops.[23] As a result, the reflection of solar radiation could adversely affect around 65% of the global population.[14]
How a Russian Space Mirror Briefly Lit Up the Night
In 1993, the 65-foot-diameter satellite, called Znamya, briefly lit the Earth like a giant orbiting night light
spacer
Protecting Half the Planet and Transforming Human Systems Are are Complimentary Goals
Nov 18, 2021 Studies forecast the dislocation of tens of millions of people from land degradation, environmental conflicts, and climate-change induced droughts and floods, sea-level rise, and mega wildfires; globally, an estimated 200 million people will be displaced by climate change alone by 2050 ( Wennersten and Robbins, 2017; Merone and Tait, 2018 ).
Responding to Criticisms of Nature Needs Half
Can protecting half the planet be realized? Critics have objected to such an undertaking most especially for three reasons (Büscher et al., 2016; Schleicher et al., 2019; Napoletano and Clark, 2020). First, they argue that large-scale protection will cause hardship for poor people living near natural areas restricted from human use. Second, they maintain that Nature Needs Half does not confront the economic system of profit-driven growth underlying resource extraction and human inequality. Finally, critics contend that Nature Needs Half conservation leaves unexamined “the other half”—conditions in the human utilized portion of the planet. Uniting these criticisms is a concern for social justice and fears that such large-scale conservation could exacerbate inequality and food insecurity by placing natural areas off limits to human access (Ellis and Mehrabi, 2019).
We respond to these criticisms by proposing complementary human-system goals that have yet to be elaborated in much of the Nature Needs Half literature. We argue that alongside expanding nature protection we also need to downsize and retool economic life, humanely and gradually reduce the global population, and transform food systems. Downscaling the human enterprise will facilitate large-scale conservation by lessening human demands on nature and reducing waste output. The combined effort to protect nature and downsize humanity’s activities and numbers will benefit humans and non-humans alike by freeing geographical space and livelihood sources for all species (Rees, 2020).
We concede critics’ point of needing to flesh out Nature Needs Half in a whole Earth context. At the same time, we regard the alternative approach they offer as falling short of the transformations needed (Cafaro et al., 2017; Kopnina et al., 2018). Instead of large-scale nature protection, critics counter that humanity must manage and allocate the natural world to serve all people in an equitable way. Contrasting their views with the Nature Needs Half proposal, for example, Büscher et al. (2016) write: “Instead, we promote concerted and widespread programmes of regulation and redistribution to equalize use and control of our remaining natural resources… Our suggestion is that natural resources and ecosystems become global public goods” (Büscher et al., 2016, p. 409). While we agree with the thrust for social justice, the non-human world seems curiously absent from moral consideration. Indeed, describing the natural world in terms of human natural resources and public goods tacitly supports the received assumptions that human beings are above and in control of nature, that Earth is subject to human ownership, and that distributive justice does not apply to non-humans (Wienhues, 2018; Washington et al., 2021).
spacer
Deep dive
Many marine biologists are enthusiastic about the possibility of being able to live underwater. “There are a number of scientists who firmly believe that the only way to really understand what’s happening in the oceanic environment is to be there,” says Tom Potts, director of the Aquarius Reef Base. “Divers from the surface have about an hour-and-a-half per day to do all of their work. If we could actually inhabit the bottom of the ocean for 30 to 60 days, imagine the productivity we could get out of researchers down there.”
KipEvansMB_0273.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=6735e02730f28df14430f50ee2c09626e00d1d490688358c8954782021eb2f66&ipo=images) |
 |
An example of the benefits came in the mid-1990s when a research group at Northeastern University, Boston, was seeking to understand the basic mechanisms behind the growth and feeding of coral. They found that doing their tests in a lab introduced all sorts of artificial effects, and that attempts to do them using boat dives failed because using scuba equipment did not give them the two to three hours they needed to set up chambers in which they wanted to produce different sea water flow rates around the coral. Shifting the experiment onto the Aquarius base allowed them to calculate optimal water flow rate for coral feeding.
It’s not just marine biologists that would benefit. Underwater archaeologists could take their time resurrecting sunken ships or searching for lost artefacts. Astronaut training has taken place in the existing underwater habitats since the isolated environments can be used to simulate living and working conditions in space. They can also act as broader educational tools. Students can visit them, or teachers can inspire them with video lessons from the bottom of the sea. Koblick converted the former La Chalupa research laboratory into the Jules Undersea Lodge as both a luxury hotel and educational facility. “Giving more people the opportunity to observe the underwater environment and get a feel for living there would help promote the oceans by getting people more interested in those habitats,” he says.
Life aquatic
Then there are those who see underwater living as a way of preserving our species in the event of an apocalyptic catastrophe. In the event of a disaster that put paid to human life, communities could perform reverse versions of Noah’s ark. With that in mind, Philip Pauley, a futurist and the founder of the London-based visual communications consultancy Pauley, designed the self-sustaining habitat Sub-Biosphere 2. His design includes circular structures that could be floated out to sea and then sunk, creating a haven for 50 to 100 lucky people.
Building an underwater city is “all I have thought about for the last 20 years,” Pauley says. To raise interest and support, he is pursuing various academic collaborations and is looking for a publisher for the first of a planned science fiction trilogy for young adults he has written called The Moral Order, featuring a dystopian future in which the protagonist discovers a hidden underwater world.
“I don’t want to come across as being fanatical so I am waiting for the right time, when people come around to the idea for themselves,” Pauley says. “When that happens, I will be here with my design.”
Larger underwater colonies are already feasible. What stops them becoming a reality is a lack of interest, motivation and funding. However Polish company Deep Ocean Technology thinks tourism is the way to make the endeavour economical. It has signed deals with architects and builders to deliver the Water Discus Hotel at the Noonu Atoll, Kuredhivaru Island in the Maldives within three years. The company is also involved in discussions about building hotels under the waves in Dubai, Singapore and more than one European location, including in Norway.
spacer
spacer
“People may think this is a project meant for just the very rich, but that’s not true. In fact it won’t be much more expensive than a regular night in a hotel, that’s the idea.”
Based on having carried out simulations, Podwojewski says it’s cheaper, safer and more efficient to design small steel and glass units that can be submerged and resurfaced using ballast tanks, than attempting to lower large structures to the ocean floor. “We ended up with a similar technology as used in submarines,” he says. “We have plenty of water around to submerge the hotel with, and if we have a problem, we release the water from the tanks and the unit automatically surfaces.”
The Water Discus Hotel will be situated 10 metres underwater in order to optimise sunlight, and will include 22 hotel rooms, a bar and a restaurant with views of the surrounding coral reefs. Prototypes are under construction. In the future, Podwojewski thinks it’s possible that such buildings could help manage overpopulation and serve as models for environmental sustainability, although he doesn’t see permanent underwater living as desirable because of the lack of natural sunlight.
spacer
Cassiopeia (mother of Andromeda)
Cassiopeia (/ˌkæsi.oʊˈpiː.ə/;[1] Ancient Greek: Κασσιόπεια Kassiópeia or Κασσιόπη Kassiópē) or Cassiepeia (Κασσιέπεια Kassiépeia), a figure in Greek mythology, was Queen of Aethiopia and wife of King Cepheus. She was arrogant and vain, characteristics that led to her downfall.
Her origins are obscure. Nonnus calls her a nymph,[2] while according to Stephanus, she was called Iope, the daughter of Aeolus, from whom the town of Joppa (now the Jaffa neighborhood in Tel Aviv) derived its name.[3]
Mythology
Cassiopeia boasted that she and her daughter Andromeda were more beautiful than all the Nereids, the nymph-daughters of the sea god Nereus. This brought the wrath of Poseidon, ruling god of the sea, upon the kingdom of Ethiopia.[4]
Accounts differ as to whether Poseidon decided to flood the whole country[5] or direct the sea monster Cetus to destroy it. In either case, trying to save their kingdom, Cepheus and Cassiopeia consulted a wise oracle, who told them that the only way to appease the sea gods was to sacrifice their daughter.
Accordingly, Andromeda was chained to a rock at the sea’s edge and left to be killed by the sea monster. Perseus arrives to kill Cetus, saves Andromeda and marries her.[5]
Poseidon thought Cassiopeia should not escape punishment, so he placed her in the heavens chained to a throne in a position that referenced Andromeda’s ordeal. The constellation resembles the chair that originally represented an instrument of torture. Cassiopeia is not always represented tied to the chair in torment; in some later drawings she holds a mirror, symbol of her vanity, while in others she holds a palm frond.
How appropriate that she is holding a MIRROR which represent the false IMAGE and a PALM Frond which represents eternal life.
Ethiopian tradition
Some Ethiopian king lists mention Cassiopeia as a ruling queen of Ethiopia. According to a king list presented by prince Tafari Makonnen, she ruled as part of the Agdazyan dynasty and reigned for 19 years from 1890 to 1871 BC, with dates following the Ethiopian calendar.[9]
Below is the Constellation Cassiopeia. Note that it appears as a W or two Vs.
spacer
CASSIOPeiA – A New SPS Concept
C-SBSP AdminIan Cash, of SICA Design Ltd, presented a new Solar Power Satellite (SPS) concept during the Space Solar Power Workshop of the IEEE WiSEE conference held in Montreal last month. Ian’s presentation is linked below. Special thanks to Elisa Shebaro of PowerSOL, who attended this conference and brought the CASSIOPeiA presentation to my attention.
The CASSIOPeiA Solar Power Satellite is “based on the principle of wavelength-scale modular integration of all major functions, from solar collection through to beam-formation.” With no moving parts, CASSIOPeiA’s patent-pending phased array permits beam steering through 360 degrees.
The ultralight helical (pertaining to or having the form of a helix; spiral) structure maintains a constant solar collecting area directly facing the Sun. Stowed as an integrated and highly compact package, this concept offers “the enticing possibility of a fully functional SPS (Solar Power Satellite) deployed as a single payload.” The full CASSIOPeiA white paper can be read here.
Dr. Seyed (Reza) A. Zekavat, Michigan Tech, and Darel Preble, Space Solar Power Institute, Georgia Tech, co-chair the Space Solar Power Workshop as part of the annual IEEE WiSEE Conference. Papers and presentations from recent Space Solar Power Workshops can be seen at the bottom of Dr. Zekavat’s faculty page, here.
spacer
How solar farms in space might beam electricity to Earth
-
Published
It sounds too good to be true: a plan to harvest solar energy from space and beam it down to Earth using microwaves.
But it’s something that could be happening as soon as 2035, according to Martin Soltau, the co-chairman at Space Energy Initiative (SEI) – a collaboration of industry and academics.
SEI is working on a project called Cassiopeia, which plans to place a constellation of very large satellites in a high Earth orbit.
Once deployed the satellites would harvest solar energy and beam it back down to Earth.
He says the potential is almost unlimited.
“In theory it could supply all of the world’s energy in 2050,” he says.
Ahh, the final goal of the elite to reach TYPE 1 Civilization – to have ALL our energy obtained from our STAR the SUN.
“There’s sufficient room in orbit for the solar power satellites, and the Sun’s supply of energy is vast. A narrow strip around geostationary Earth orbit receives more than 100 times the amount of energy per year than all of humanity is forecast to use in 2050,” Mr Soltau says.
Is that forecast based on a trajectory of our current population? Or is it based on usage after they kill off 90% of the human population?
Earlier this year, the UK government announced £3m in funding for space-based solar power (SBSP) projects, following an engineering study conducted by consultancy Frazer-Nash that concluded the technology was viable.
SEI is hoping to get a big chunk of that money.
Its satellites would be made up of hundreds of thousands of small, identical modules produced in factories on Earth, and assembled in space by autonomous robots, who would also carry out servicing and maintenance.
The solar energy collected by the satellites would be converted into high frequency radio waves and beamed to a rectifying antenna on Earth, which would convert the radio waves into electricity.
Each satellite could deliver around 2GW of power into the grid, making each satellite comparable in power output to a nuclear power station.
Here on Earth, sunlight is diffused by the atmosphere, but in space it comes directly from the sun without interference.
So a space-based solar panel can collect a lot more energy than a similar sized one on Earth.
Similar projects are under development elsewhere.
In the US, for example, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is working on some of the critical technologies needed for such a system, in a project known as Space Solar Power Incremental Demonstrations and Research (SSPIDR).
These include improving solar cell efficiencies, solar-to-radio frequency conversion and beam forming, as well as reducing the large temperature fluctuations on spacecraft components and creating designs for deployable structures.
Late last year, the team successfully demonstrated new components for a so-called sandwich tile, which is used to convert solar energy into radio waves.
So is it safe to beam energy back to earth?
In a 2009 reportNasa scientist James Logan looked at the safety issues. In his report, he said the intensity of a typical space-based microwave beam would reach 30mW/cm2 at the centre – around 3% as strong as a typical counter-top microwave oven.
At its perimeter, the energy from the beam would be around the same as the amount of radiation that current standards allow to leak up to 5cm away from a microwave oven.
Although birds might be able to detect the microwave beams, the beams could “never even come close to ‘cooking’ birds in flight”, the report said.
While many of the biggest hurdles have already been cleared, there are still potential problems.
“My personal take on this is that we like to think the technology is there, but it’s not quite ready yet for us to embark on a project of such complexity,” says Dr Jovana Radulovic, a thermodynamics lecturer at the University of Portsmouth, who specialises in renewable energy systems.
She makes the point that launching a large number of solar panels into space will be expensive and, given that any project could require hundreds of launches, it would generate a lot of carbon dioxide.
But there is cause for optimism. An environmental analysis of the Cassiopeia project by the University of Strathclyde has concluded that overall, including launch, the carbon footprint could be as little as half that of terrestrial solar, at about 24g of CO2 per kilowatt-hour.
As stated in the Video: “The carbon footprint from launching the Casseiopia Project WILL BE 100 TIMES higher than the emissions of all our industries and transport put together. What a coincidence, to obtain clean space solar energy we risk further destroying the damaged ecosystem of Earth.” On our way to becoming a Type 1 Civilization we should not heavily rely on new mega projects with unexpected consequences. Maybe we should just use the energy sources we are used to.
Nuclear Power plants already have know risks which make them undesireable, and we have no way to dispose of the nuclear waste they produce. We have been storing it in hopes that someday someone will come up with an idea of what to do with it.
Every Fusion Energy Reactor built so far consumes more energy for its own launch that it can produces at output.
In the video, it appears that the scientists plan to build turbines and fusion plants underwater and tunnel under the earth to heat water and create steam. SO, now we know what all the tunneling under the earth has been about and all the mapping of the ocean.
Still they will not be able to produce enough energy to become a Type 1 Civilization. Their solution? WEATHER as a producer of energy. In order to move us to the level needed to become a Type 1 they are using the power of hurricanes, volcanoes, earthquakes, tornados, floods and lightning.
spacer
DARPA CONTROLS THE WEATHER? – DR MICHIO KAKU – 2 MINS
Dr Michio Kaku is a respected physicist and talks about laser technology the military used and is using to control the weather. This interview is an older one so you can imagine where this technology is now with 5G.
Here’s more: https://geopolitics.co/2015/06/06/us-air-force-admits-they-can-control-weather/
spacer
“There is something beyond Type 3, there is something beyond Glactic it is DARK ENERGY. There is an Energy Source beyond the galaxy itself. It makes up 73 percent of the Universe, DARK ENERGY.”
spacer
A podcast (“Fire in the Minds of Man”) and other clips are taken from: theageoftransitions.com; 
/ addtv; / suspectsky; / michiokakuvideos. . Hi folks. In this video you are going to see a lot of topics. The main “actor” in this plot is Dr. Michio Kaku. Dr. Kaku have been describing types of civilizations… According to him, there are 3 types of civilizations in this universe (or even multiverse): “a type 1 Civilization has the power of the entire planet — they control the weather, they mine the oceans, they control volcanoes, they control earthquakes”… Mr. Kaku also had said that our Civilization is Type 0 (so in fact, there are 4 types of civilizations :)… But this futurologist predicted that we going to Type 1 Civilization… he predicted that it will occur around 2100 “and we see the beginnings of that now”. So, folks, we are living now at the transition period… I recently saw / suspectsky video about the strange activities on Earth: volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, temperature records in US (+ and -) etc. and also Mr. Kaku’s conference about the Types of Civilizations… So… what recently happened on Earth (eruptions, earthquakes, extreme weather) could be just a coincidence and pure speculations… Who knows I definitely do not know, but I’m aware of these strange events on Earth and Mr. Kaku’s statement… That keeps me wondering… The net is full and oversaturated of these revolutionary and futuristic ideas… So I decided to insert more video segments in this particular clip in order show how do these revolutionists futurologists think – a pattern of thinking, if you will, so to speak 🙂 In my personal opinion, Aaron Franz explains these kind of things very well, so I borrowed some podcasts and clips in order to explain their way of thinking (and where these “great (enlightened?) minds leads us”)… And folks I have to say to you very simple thing: despite from which angle you look at revolutionists, transhumanists, some advanced scientists, futurologists and etc., you are going to find a key theme which ties them and that is an old (Babilonic) religion or Promethean/Luciferian philosophy or alchemy… So at this particular point it is pointless for me to explain more, because Aaron Franz ( / addtv ) explains these things very good. I personally think that the best explanation of Promethean/Luciferian philosophy, the progress of science and its ultimate goal (the AI) can be found in a short science fictional presentation/trailer of the movie Prometheus • Video . In short, Peter Weyland says: 1) Prometheus gave us fire — our first true piece of technology; 2) “At this moment of our civilization, we can create cybernetic individuals, who in just a few short years will be completely indistinguishable from us.” (we are at this transition period folks…); 3) “Which leads to an obvious conclusion: WE are the gods now.” And that for me personally tells everything (about a connection of the progress of science and ancient mystery religion which do exist today under many names) in 3 sentences… So please watch this clip if you want to know how Mr. Kaku explains revolutions, what he thinks about twitter and facebook, religion and other opinion of the same particular question… I also attached at the end suspectsky youtuber’s clip about extreme weather [Extreme Weather Phenomena Escalating Worldwide]. I hope that this clip will intrigue you… Thank You for Your attention. Bye know 🙂 and take care 😀
spacer”
spacer
Michio Kaku Describes how “Trillion Watt Lasers” Can Modify The Weather in CBS Interview
During an interview with CBS in Feb 2014, Michio Kaku described how “trillion watt lasers” can modify the weather. Transcribed here are Kaku’s words only, the entire video is posted below.
(Anchor)
Lasers? Really? To change the weather?
Kaku:
That’s right, well as Mark Twain famously said, “everyone complains about the weather but no one does anything about it.” Well, instead of doing a rain dance, we physicists are firing lasers into the sky to actually precipitate rain clouds and actually bring down lightning bolts. This is potentially a game changer.
… It’s experimental, however in the laboratory so far it works. When you have water vapor and you have dust particles or ice crystals you can precipitate rain. It condenses around the seeds. These seeds can also be created by laser beams.By firing trillion watt lasers you rip apart the electrons creating what are called ions and these ions act like seeds like dust particles bringing down rain and even lightning.
Even in the 60’s the CIA used this to uh bring down monsoons during the Vietnam war to wash out the Viet Cong. Governments have been playing with this thing…
(Anchor interrupts)
“Alleged to, alleged to!”
Kaku:
Alleged to right. Now… We realize that for decades now these governments have been alleged to have experimented with weather control but nothing conclusive.
This time we’re bringing in the laws of physics rather than simply waving our hands and uttering mumbo jumbo. We’re actually using trillion watt lasers now. And in the laboratory, sure enough, they precipitate rain out of water vapor. Sure enough you can actually bring that electricity down, down the beam.
(Anchor asks about a situation of drought)
Kaku:
The bad news is if it’s a clear blue sky it’s not gonna do anything at all because it only takes water vapor that’s already in the air and condenses it. However, for floods, for agriculture, farmers, for people planning wedding parties, football games, you name it, outdoor events, and agriculture and flooding and even hurricanes… all of them could be subject to weather modification.
Russ Tanner (GlobalSkywatch.com) makes some excellent observations on this interview (March 2016):
Michio Kaku Weather Control Disinformation: “Someday We’ll Control the Weather”
When you tell someone, “we’re currently working on it”, you clearly imply “we can’t do it now”. When the government or a large corporation wants to quash any public suspicion of the existence of an advanced technology, they simply tell the public, “we’re currently working on it”.
This technique has been used for years to quash public suspicions about ongoing chemtrail spraying. The government has gone to great lengths to hide the truth. They have published papers, held conferences, produced educational materials, and provided falsified studies about the potential future of sprayed aerosols into the sky to combat “climate change”.
Because the ongoing spraying is the most damaging human activity ever executed, the disinformation campaign also has to be the largest ever executed, and this is the reason you see so much buzz about the future of aerosol spraying.
In the video below, Michio Kaku, the new public spokesperson for science who replaced Carl Segan after his death, disinforms the public by saying “one day we’ll be able to control the weather”.
Take note how Michio emphasis the statements, “in the lab”, and “nothing conclusive (yet)” to further impress the lie that weather control is not yet implemented. Michio knows exactly what he’s doing.
(video published Feb 2014)
Michio Kaku – Controlling the Weather
The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) was created in the early 1990’s as part of an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
HAARP technology enables the military to modify and weaponize the weather, by triggering earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes, according to government officials.
An article on the website Anongroup.org states:
“One detail in a plethora of academic papers and patents about altering the weather with electromagnetic energy and conductive particles in the stratosphere, research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences said the “laser beams” can create plasma channels in air, causing ice to form. According to Professor Wolf Kasparian:
Under conditions typical for thin cirrus ice clouds, however, the plasma channels induced a surprisingly strong effect of ice multiplication.
Within a few minutes, the laser action led to a strong enhancement of the total ice particle number density in the chamber by up to a factor of 100, even though only a 10−9 fraction of the chamber volume was exposed to the plasma channels.
The newly formed ice particles quickly reduced the water vapor pressure to ice saturation, thereby increasing the cloud optical thickness by up to three orders of magnitude.’”
Defense contractors Raytheon, BAE Systems, and corporations such as General Electric have been shown to be very involved with geoengineering.
Massachusetts has historically been a center of geoengineering research according to Peter Kirby:
With the hurricanes that are ravaging the US, floods destroying India, and wildfires the Pacific Northwest, weather warfare is a topic on people’s minds right now. Please share this information.
spacer
4.23K subscribers
spacer
I submit to you that the elite are already fully in control of our weather, and they are already playing with stars, as evidenced by all that we see going on with NASA and space today. They will NEVER STOP PUSHING THE ENVELOPE, THEY DO NOT EVEN CARE IF THE BLOW UP THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE!
spacer
48 subscribers
WEF Klaus Schwab: “God Is Dead – We Are Your Gods – You Have No Soul – You Are Programable Slaves – Do as We Say or Die”
spacer
4183:1411 months, 1 week ago
“We Need Some Type of Global Loyalty”The Jew by nature is anti-Nature
Join & Support Joey Faust and the Phoenix Party to put an end to the Jewish Homo-Global Madness.
1 year ago
1041:44First published at 12:52 UTC on April 12th, 2022.
ReAwaken America Tour History:*April – Tulsa, Oklahoma was 100% Sold Out*June – Tampa, Florida Was 100% Sold Out*July – Anaheim, California Was 100% Sold Out*August – Grand Rapids, Michigan Was 100% Sold Out*September – Colorado Springs, CO Was 100% Sold Out*November – San Antonio, TX Was 100% Sold Out*December – Dallas, TX Was 100% Sold Out*January – Phoenix, AR Was 100% Sold Out*February – Canton, OH Was 100% Sold Out*March – San Diego, CA Was 100% Sold Out*April – Salem, Oregon Was 100% Sold OutReAwaken America Tour Featured / Past Speakers Include:General Flynn, Mike Lindell, Robert F. Kennedy, Texas Attorney General of Texas Ken Paxton, Charlie Kirk, Chad Prather, Pastor Phil Hotsenpiller, Robert Kennedy Jr., Ian Smith, Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Owen Schroyer, Melissa Tate, Trump-Attorney Jenna Ellis, Dave Scarlett, Senator Wendy Rogers, Doctor Richard Bartlett, Gene Ho, Patrick Byrne, Scott McCay, Anna Khait, Sam Sorbo, Doctor Mark Sherwood, Attorney Thomas Renz, Doctor Stella Emmanuel, Attorney Leigh Dundas, Doctor Jim Meehan, Sheriff Vic Regalado, Joey Gilbert, Doctor Sherri Tenpenny, Doctor Rob Marsh, Leila Centner, Lori Gregory, Kevin Jenkins, Doctor Carrie Madej, Doctor Judy Mikovits, Steve Maxwell, Doctor Eric Nepute, Alfie Oakes, Sidney Powell, Doctor Alan Keyes, Pastor Artur Pawlowski, Mike Provenzano, Doctor Shannon Kroner, Doctor Andy Wakefeld, Pastor Jackson Lahmeyer, Amanda Grace, Doctor Cordie Williams, Pastor Mark Burns,etc.
11 months, 3 weeks ago
725 subscribers
spacer