FULLY RESTORED 5/8/23 (Half of my post was missing)
If I were not researching for my post, I would not have watched the Coronation. Though it is a very significant event in our time. If one were to take it all at just the face value, it could be seen as lovely, entertaining and heartwarming. The entire even was presented as if it were a truly “Christian” event, filled with religious references to Faith and the Holy Spirit and GOD. Not much mention of Jesus and NO meantion at all of the blood. But, enough references to make the average person accept it as a Protestant Religious Ceremony.
No doubt what I have to share about it will not be well received by most. People want to believe the best, and avoid the TRUTH at all cost.
What one must keep in mind is that everything presented to you is intended to deceive. Presented to lull you into a false sense of security, to get your guard down so that your resistance to their magic spells and incantations will be minimal. What the truly hope to accomplish is to fool you into participating in their sympathetic magic, thereby voluntarily locking you to their agenda.
The entire theme of any Coronation is the pronouncing, anointing and crowning the King or Queen with the blessing of God. But, what god was being invoked in this particular Coronation?
If one is calling on God for their blessing, guidance, protection, anointing… certainly it would require those supplicating to be first of all believers in said God, second of all in good standing with same God and sincere in mind, heart and spirit. Wouldn’t they?
spacer
5If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. 6But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed. 7For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord. 8A double minded man is unstable in all his ways. James 1
spacerspacer
Not all the water in the rough rude sea can wash the balm off from an anointed king. The breath of worldly men cannot depose the deputy elected by the Lord. Shakespeare’s Richard II Act 3 Scene 2
Throughout the events of May 6, it was brought to our attention that the first CORONATION in the British Isles was that of Aidan of Lindisfarne who was anointed by St. Columbo. This is supposed to ease your mind that this is a “Christian Religious Ritual”. I assure you that St. Columbo was not a follower of the Word of God, nor was he ordained of GOD to anoint ANYONE. For more information on this topic. Check out my post:
The Ancient Mystery Religion – The MAGI(CIANS)
spacer
Aidan of Lindisfarne – Wikipedia
Aidan (died 651) was the founder and first bishop of the Lindisfarne island monastery in England. He is credited with restoring Christianity to Northumbria. The Britons had been Christian before the Irish, since Britain, though not Ireland, was part of the Roman Empire. (so they were converted to ROMAN Catholocism, not fait in Christ.) Aidan is the Anglicised form of the original Old Irish Aedán, Modern Irish Aodhán (meaning ‘ little fiery one ‘).
Aidan, also spelled Aedan, (died c. 608), king of the Scottish kingdom of Dalriada. He was the son of Gabran, king of Dalriada. Aidan was inaugurated as king at Iona by St. Columba. He refused to allow his kingdom to remain dependent on the Irish Dalriada; but, coming into collision with his southern neighbours, he led a large force against Aethelfrith, king of the Northumbrians
spacer
Iona’s place in history was secured in 563 AD when St.Columba arrived on its white sandy beaches with 12 followers, built his first Celtic church and established a monastic community. Once settled, the Irish monk set about converting most of pagan Scotland and northern England to the Gaelic-Christian faith.
spacer
spacer
Let’s investigate and get to know exactly what Carolean means.
Abstract
The Carolingian period, roughly the eighth and ninth centuries, was dynamic and decisive in European religious history. The ruling dynasty and the clerical elite promoted wave after wave of reform that I call “unifying,” “specifying,” and “sanctifying.” This presidential address argues that religion was the key unifying and universalizing force in the Carolingian world; that the Carolingians were obsessed with doing things the right way—usually the Roman way; and that the Carolingians sought to inculcate Christian behavior more than religious knowledge. The address concludes by arguing that the Carolingians put a markedly European stamp on Christianity and that they Romanized Christianity well before the papacy attempted to do so.
Charlemagne was an 8th-century Frankish king who has attained a status of almost mythical proportions in the West. Among other things, he was responsible for uniting most of Europe under his rule by power of the sword, for helping to restore the Western Roman Empire and becoming its first emperor, and for facilitating a cultural and intellectual renaissance, the ramifications of which were felt in Europe for centuries afterward.
spacer
Carolingian dynasty was started long before Charles I of England.
What does Pippinids mean? – Definitions.net
.The Pippinids or Arnulfings were a Frankish aristocratic family from Austrasia during the Merovingian period. They dominated the office of mayor of the palace after 687 and eventually supplanted the Merovingians as kings in 751, founding the Carolingian dynasty.
spacer
THE ORIGIN OF THE CAROLINIAN DYNASTY began with Austrasia
Austrasia can be taken to correspond roughly to these present-day territories:
Luxembourg,
parts of eastern Belgium,
north-eastern France (Lorraine and Champagne-Ardenne),
west-central Germany (the Rhineland, Hesse and Franconia) and the southern Netherlands (Limburg, North Brabant, with a
salient north of the Rhine including Utrecht and parts of Gelderland).
spacer
In 718, Charles Martel had Austrasian support in his war against Neustria for control of all the Francian realms. He was not king himself, but appointed Chlothar IV to rule in Austrasia. In 719, Francia was united by Martel’s family, the Carolingian dynasty, under Austrasian hegemony. While the Frankish kings continued to divide up the Frankish realm in different ways over subsequent generations, the term Austrasia was only used occasionally after the Carolingian dynasty.
Carolingian dynasty –
Charlemagne was crowned “emperor of the Romans” by Pope Leo III in 800 CE, thus restoring the Roman Empire in the West for the first time since its dissolution in the 5th century. Charlemagne was selected for a variety of reasons, not least of which was his long-standing protectorate over the papacy. His protector status became explicit in 799, when the pope was attacked in Rome and fled to Charlemagne for asylum. The ensuing negotiations ended with Leo’s reinstallation as pope and Charlemagne’s own coronation as Holy Roman emperor.
The first three decades of Charlemagne’s reign were characterized by extensive military campaigning. His campaign against the Saxons proved to be his most difficult and long-lasting one. After thirty years of on-again, off-again fighting, betrayed truces, and bloody reprisals enacted by the Franks, the Saxons finally submitted in 804. Charlemagne’s activities in Saxony were accompanied by simultaneous campaigns in Italy, Bavaria, and Spain—the last of which ended in a resounding defeat for the Franks and was later mythologized in the 11th-century French epic The Song of Roland. Nonetheless, Charlemagne’s reputation as a warrior king was well earned, and he had expanded his domain to cover much of western Europe by the end of his reign.
What was the Carolingian Renaissance?
Charlemagne facilitated an intellectual and cultural golden age during his reign that historians call the Carolingian Renaissance—after the Carolingian dynasty, to which he belonged. Charlemagne peopled his court with renowned intellectuals and clerics, and together they fashioned a series of objectives designed to uplift what they perceived as the flagging Christian populace of Europe. Improving Latin literacy was primary among these objectives, seen as a means to improve administrative and ecclesiastical effectiveness in the kingdom. A completely new writing system called Carolingian minuscule was established; libraries and schools proliferated, as did books to fill and be used in them; and new forms of art, poetry, and biblical exegesis flourished. The effects of Charlemagne’s cultural program were evident during his reign but even more so afterward, when the education infrastructure he had created served as the basis upon which later cultural and intellectual revivals were built.
spacer
The historian Bernard Bachrach argues that the rise of the Carolingians to power is best understood using the theory of a Carolingian grand strategy. A grand strategy is a long term military and political strategy that lasts for longer than a typical campaigning season, and can span long periods of time.[50] The Carolingians followed a set course of action that discounts the idea of a random rise in power and can be considered as a grand strategy. Another major part of the grand strategy of the early Carolingians encompassed their political alliance with the aristocracy. This political relationship gave the Carolingians authority and power in the Frankish kingdom. Source
spacer
Charlemagne (/ˈʃɑːrləmeɪn, ˌʃɑːrləˈmeɪn/ SHAR-lə-mayn, -MAYN, French: [ʃaʁləmaɲ]) or Charles the Great (Latin: Carolus Magnus; Frankish: Karl;[3] 2 April 747[a] – 28 January 814), a member of the Carolingian dynasty, was King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and the Emperor of the Romans from 800. Charlemagne succeeded in uniting the majority of western and central Europe and was the first recognized emperor to rule from western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire approximately three centuries earlier.[4] The expanded Frankish state that Charlemagne founded was the Carolingian Empire, which is considered the first phase in the history of the Holy Roman Empire. He was canonized by Antipope Paschal III—an act later treated as invalid—and he is now regarded by some as beatified (which is a step on the path to sainthood) in the Catholic Church.
Charlemagne was the eldest son of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon. He was born before their canonical marriage.[5] He became king of the Franks in 768 following his father’s death, and was initially co-ruler with his brother Carloman I until the latter’s death in 771.[6] As sole ruler, he continued his father’s policy towards protection of the papacy and became its sole defender, removing the Lombards from power in northern Italy and leading an incursion into Muslim Spain. He also campaigned against the Saxons to his east, Christianizing them (upon penalty of death) which led to events such as the Massacre of Verden. He reached the height of his power in 800 when he was crowned Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Old St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome.
Charlemagne has been called the “Father of Europe” (Pater Europae),[7] as he united most of Western Europe for the first time since the classical era of the Roman Empire, as well as uniting parts of Europe that had never been under Frankish or Roman rule. His reign spurred the Carolingian Renaissance, a period of energetic cultural and intellectual activity within the Western Church. The Eastern Orthodox Church viewed Charlemagne less favourably, due to his support of the filioque and the Pope’s preference of him as emperor over the Byzantine Empire‘s first female monarch, Irene of Athens. These and other disputes led to the eventual split of Rome and Constantinople in the Great Schism of 1054.[8][b]
Charlemagne died in 814 after contracting an infectious lung disease.[9] He was laid to rest in the Aachen Cathedral, in his imperial capital city of Aachen. He married at least four times,[10][2] and three of his legitimate sons lived to adulthood. Only the youngest of them, Louis the Pious, survived to succeed him. Charlemagne is a direct ancestor of many of Europe’s royal houses, including the Capetian dynasty,[c] the Ottonian dynasty,[d] the House of Luxembourg,[e] the House of Ivrea[f] and the House of Habsburg.[g]
The name Charlemagne (English: /ˈʃɑːrləmeɪn, ˌʃɑːrləˈmeɪn/ SHAR-lə-mayn, -MAYN),[17] by which the emperor is normally known in English, comes from the French Charles-le-magne, meaning “Charles the Great”.[h] In modern German, Karl der Große has the same meaning. His given name in his native Frankish dialect was Karl (“Charles”, Latin: Carolus; Old High German: Karlus; Gallo-Romance: Karlo).[18][3] He was named after his grandfather, Charles Martel, a choice which intentionally marked him as Martel’s true heir.[19]
The nickname magnus (great) may have been associated with him already in his lifetime, but this is not certain. The contemporary Latin Royal Frankish Annals routinely call him Carolus magnus rex, “Charles the great king”.[20] As a nickname, it is only certainly attested in the works of the Poeta Saxo around 900 and it only became standard in all the lands of his former empire around 1000.[21]
Charles’ achievements gave a new meaning to his name. In many languages of Europe, the very word for “king” derives from his name; e.g., Polish: król, Ukrainian: король (korol’), Czech: král, Slovak: kráľ, Hungarian: király, Lithuanian: karalius, Latvian: karalis, Russian: король, Macedonian: крал, Bulgarian: крал, Serbo-Croatian Cyrillic: краљ/kralj, Turkish: kral. This development parallels that of the name of the Caesars in the original Roman Empire, which became kaiser and tsar (or czar), among others.[22]
<
Every monarch has their name, and every name has a history. The first two King Charles’s to sit on the throne set quite a precedent.
King Charles III is the new monarch of the United Kingdom. Unless you’ve literally been living under a rock for the last week, you’re bound to know that already.
Charles Philip Arthur George Windsor was destined for the throne from the day he was born. But the name he’d take when it was finally his turn to wear the crown wasn’t definite.
A monarch’s name isn’t automatically their first name.
While his mother went with her first name, previous monarchs have opted otherwise. The previous monarch, King George VI, was called Albert. George was one of his middle names.
Similarly, Queen Victoria’s actual first name was Alexandria and had Victoria as a middle name. King Charles III could have done likewise and picked a middle name as his monarchical title.
King Philip might have been a nice tribute to his father and King George would have continued a tradition with his grandfather, George VI. Choosing King Arthur might have one too many associations with fighting off dragons for a man who first sat on the throne aged 73.
So Charles went with… Charles.
The Third Carolean Age
No big surprises there, really. But by going for his first name, he’s decided to usher in a new era for Britain. The Second Elizabethan era has been replaced by the Third Carolean Age.
Well, it might be known as that.
Charles I’s reign is generally referred to as the Caroline Era, while Charles II’s reign is called the Carolean Era. Both derived from ‘Carolus’ the Latin for Charles.
Regardless of how the Latin fans decide to name his reign, the choice of becoming the third Charles on the British throne is significant as it frames his reign in the context of the two Charles’ who came before him.
And that’s interesting because historically, King Charles is a name associated with big changes.
So who were the first two?
King Charles I
Charles I’s reign was dominated by tension between the crown and parliament. Charles dissolved the parliament and ruled without it for 11 years between 1629 and 1640.
Civil War broke out after Charles attempted to imprison lawmakers in 1642. The King fought battles against the Scottish Parliamentary Army and Oliver Cromwell’s New Model Army during the next six years.
Charles was captured but refused demands for a constitutional monarchy (what the UK has today). Instead, he escaped only to lose another battle in 1648.
Charles I was convicted of high treason and executed in 1649. The monarchy was abolished and Oliver Cromwell was the first non-royal of the British Isles.
spacer
spacer
King Charles II
The second Charles to become king was Charles I’s son.
Born in 1630, Charles II fled to mainland Europe when his father was executed. He stayed abroad until 1660 when Britain restored the monarchy following Cromwell’s death in 1658.
Charles II’s reign was defined by the lack of power he had. Stripped of the ability to create laws without the consent of parliament, Charles II’s time on the throne set the tone for the constitutional monarchy that Britain has today.
Known as the “Merry Monarch”, King Charles II was popular for bringing back a flourishing arts scene after years of Cromwell’s puritanism.
He also got the nickname for fathering 12 illegitimate children but not a single actual heir.
Today, King Charles II is perhaps best remembered through the dog breed named after him, the King Charles Spaniel.
And now Britain has its third Charles. Which of the previous two’s legacies do you think he’ll try to take after?
spacer
What kind of CHANGES are in store under King Charles III?? Do we have clues?
spacer
Here’s How King Charles III Is Expected To Change The Monarchy
Wpa Pool/Getty Images
BY SARA CASKEY/UPDATED: SEPT. 9, 2022 9:40 AM EST
England’s Queen Elizabeth II passed away peacefully September 8, 2022 at the age of 96. She was surrounded by her family (via BBC). King Charles III, formerly the Prince of Wales, automatically assumed the role of monarch at the age of 73, becoming England’s first king in 70 years. As the eldest son of the queen, Charles was named heir in 1952 at just 3 years old, making him the longest-serving heir apparent, according to Time. As the public reacts to the heartbreaking death of Queen Elizabeth, Charles III prepares for his coronation, set to take place after the official mourning period comes to a close (via The New York Post). As noted by Time, Queen Elizabeth’s official coronation did not take place until 16 months after the death of her father.
King Charles III commented on his mother’s legacy in an emotional statement following her death. “We mourn profoundly the passing of a cherished Sovereign and a much-loved Mother,” read his official statement on The Royal Family’s Twitter. “I know her loss will be deeply felt throughout the country, the Realms and the Commonwealth, and by countless people around the world.” Though everything that will happen when the former Prince Charles becomes king is still unofficial, he is expected to drastically change key features of the monarchy.
King Charles III is expected to reframe the role of the royal family
Lorna Roberts/Shutterstock
The recently-appointed king will make several changes to the monarchy, most notably reframing the role of the royal family, per Insider. The predicted “slimmed down” monarchy could mean a condensed team of working royals, limited patronages, and smaller living quarters. According to the Daily Mail, the King has recognized the financial strain that a large monarchy imposes on the public (and Buckingham Palace’s centuries-old balcony). Angela Levin, esteemed royal biographer, appeared on TalkRadio in 2021, explaining that Charles has hoped to slim down the number of working royals “for a very long time,” per The Daily Mail.
It’s still unclear what members of the Royal Family will remain in service — The Queen Consort, The Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, and Princess Anne are currently active members, according to Express. While other branches of the family may continue to represent the crown in a limited capacity, royal commentator Kinsey Schofield predicts that “Charles will try to draw attention to himself, Camilla, and the Cambridge family as the future of the monarchy,” per Insider. Whatever the case, a smaller monarchy will drastically impact the number of royal public engagements. Charles III also has plans to grant the public increased access to the official London residence and turn the queen’s beloved Balmoral into a memorial museum (via Daily Mail).
King Charles III will tackle climate change
LINGTREN.COM/Shutterstock
The former Prince of Wales is the founder of The Prince’s Trust, a charitable organization partially-dedicated to environmental sustainability. In the coming years, The King is expected to actively address climate change (via The Daily Mail). In 2021, he spoke at the COP26 Climate Summit in Glasgow, imploring world leaders to “find practical ways of overcoming differences” in order to “rescue this precious planet,” per Rev.com.
As reported by Reuters, King Charles commented on his history of environmental activism in a 2021 TV interview, saying “Why do you think I’ve done all this for all these years? Because I minded about, and always have done, the next generation.” According to Vox, style=”color: #ff0000;”>the former Prince of Wales will use the monarchy’s “soft power” and global connections to advocate for sustainability. As explained by historian Ed Owens, “He’s very much trying to create a new global platform for the British monarchy.” Though the King has been a divisive figure in the past – we finally know why the former Prince Charles and Princess Diana Divorced – these present uncertainties could lead to long-term, historical change.
spacer
Prince Charles’ views on religion could force him to GIVE UP throne – ‘ABDICATION’
PRINCE Charles’ outspoken views, including those on religion, mean his accession on the throne could trigger a national debate between the Church of England and the state. In a recently-unearthed documentary religious experts discuss the future king’s position on religion.
Prince Charles has praised Islam, Sikhism, Buddhism and Greek Orthodox church | Parliament would need to amend the 1953 Royal Titles Act to allow the Prince to defend faiths |
A Clarence House spokesman previously said on the issue: “There has been work done on the accession planning as you would expect however there has been no planning of the Coronation or its contents. “Vernon Bogdanor, Professor of Government at Oxford University, told the Telegraph: “In 1952, when the Queen came to the throne, it was very much an Anglican society. The Prince of Wales will become head of a nation which is multi-denominational.
spacer
There is nothing wrong with diversity. Everyone must be free to choose their own path. But, those who have found their spiritual home with the Creator of ALL THINGS, they cannot and must not turn from that relationship just because they do not want to offend anyone. When you know the truth in your deepest soul, you cannot deny it. That does not mean that you cannot live in a world where there are those of different beliefs and practices.
spacer
“The Prince has said that he wants to be seen as a defender of all religious faiths and not just the Anglican church but the Coronation is an Anglican ceremony. Any change would require legislation.”
space
spacer
The expert said that it would be possible that members of other faiths, such as Muslims and Hindus would attend Charles’ Coronation at Westminster Abbey when he comes king.
|LONDON
Rabbi Nicky Liss won’t be watching King Charles III’s coronation. He’ll be doing something he considers more important: praying for the monarch on the Jewish sabbath. On Saturday, he will join rabbis across Britain in reading a prayer in English and Hebrew that gives thanks for the new king in the name of the “one God who created us all.” Liss, the rabbi of Highgate Synagogue in north London, said British Jews appreciated Charles’ pledge to promote the co-existence of all faiths and his record of supporting a multifaith society during his long apprenticeship as heir to the throne.
“When he says he wants to be a defender of faiths, that means the world because our history hasn’t always been so simple and we haven’t always lived freely; we haven’t been able to practice our religion,” Liss told The Associated Press. “But knowing that King Charles acts this way and speaks this way is tremendously comforting.”At a time when religion is fueling tensions around the world – from Hindu nationalists in India to Jewish settlers in the West Bank and fundamentalist Christians in the United States – Charles is trying to bridge the differences between the faith groups that make up Britain’s increasingly diverse society.
When one’s religions calls for animal sacrifice, or human sacrifice – there is a problem.
spacer
norfolk | Etymology, origin and meaning of the name norfolk by etymonline
Norfolk a maritime county in East Anglia, England, late 14c., earlier Norþfolc, Nordfolc, 1066, literally ” (Territory of the) Northern People (of the East Angles);” see north + folk (n.). The Norfolk pine (1778), used as an ornamental tree, is from Norfolk Island in the South Pacific, northwest of New Zealand, where it is native. Entries linking to Norfolk
History of Norwich – Visit Norwich
Norwich is the most complete medieval city in England. Iron Age During the Roman conquest of Britain the Celtic Iceni tribe occupied East Anglia. Boudicca, a fiercely strong, independent woman led an uprising against the Romans which sadly failed.
north + wich (n.) |
-wich town – Wikipedia |
spacer
What is the Bishop of Norwich’s role in the coronation?
The Bishop of Norwich will have a significant role in the coronation service – after it was announced he will serve as a bishops assistant to the Queen Consort at the ceremony.
Lambeth Palace has confirmed the Right Reverend Graham Usher will be one of Camilla’s two bishops assistants during Saturday’s (May 6) coronation service at Westminster Abbey.
"Sandringham, here in @DioceseNorwich, plays a very special part in the life of the @RoyalFamily."
Rt Rev Graham Usher, @bishopnorwich, shares about his involvement in the Coronation of King Charles III.#Coronation pic.twitter.com/veMwshC85e
— The Church of England (@churchofengland) May 3, 2023
spacer
Sandringham House is a country house in the parish of Sandringham, Norfolk, England. It is one of the royal residences of Charles III, whose grandfather, George VI, and great-grandfather, George V, both died there. The house stands in a 20,000-acre estate in the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.Wikipedia
|
The Bishop of Hereford, the Right Reverend Richard Jackson, will serve as Camilla’s other bishops assistant.
Already announced are Charles’ bishops assistant – the Bishop of Durham, the Right Reverend Paul Butler, and the Bishop of Bath and Wells, the Right Reverend Michael Beasley.
spacer
It was impossible not to notice the woman with the sword during the anointing and crowing of King Charles. She cut a striking figure in her very Greek looking outfit, which was given further credence as the narrator spoke about Prince Phillip Greek heritage as she came forward with the sword.
s[acer
Queen Elizabeth’s husband and King Charles’ Father, Prince Philip was born in Greece and baptized in the Greek Orthodox church, converting religions before his wedding to Queen Elizabeth II in November 1947.
Note the three branches on her back – Pagan Trinity | President of the Privvy Council of England | Note the three branches from the front- Osiris/Nimrod – Semiramis – Tammuz |
You see in the photos above that Ms. Mordaunt has three branches showing on the front one one her hat and two on her cape. She also has three branches of laurel leaves on the back of her cape. Of course three and three make 6, another very significant symbol to the ELite.
No one can deny that the garments Penny Mordaunt is wearing immediately conjure up the thought of GREECE. The Laurel Leaf and it’s connection with the Olympics. To the Elite, the Trinity of Osiris-Semiramis-Tammuz is very important. That is why the include 3 symbolism in everything.
spacer
What Is the Symbolism of Laurel Wreath? The laurel tree, commonly known as the Laurus nobilis, is a large shrub with green, smooth leaves, native to the Mediterranean region. In ancient Greece, it was a symbol dedicated to Apollo, and later adopted by Romans as a symbol of triumph. The laurel wreath has been used in a variety of ways and features in many ancient Roman and Greek myths. |
Laurel wreath In common modern idiomatic usage, a laurel wreath or “crown” refers to a victory. The expression “resting on one’s laurels” refers to someone relying entirely on long-past successes for continued fame or recognition, where to “look to one’s laurels” means to be careful of losing rank to competition. [2] Background Apollo and Daphne |
What’s a laureate? A classicist explains the word’s roots in Ancient Greece Sep 30, 2022 Laurel’s function as a prize in honor of Apollo and a marker of poetic power is the reason the laureate crown was adopted to honor poets and men of letters in the early Renaissance. |
spacer
Below you see within the VICTORY Wreath or Poetic Laurette on the left a Greek Ladies Dress Hat and on the right Ms. Penny Mordaunt’s headpiece.. I pulled the images of the gold laurel leaf wreaths below to show you how the ones on her dress are identical.
spacer
So, who is this person, and why was she given such prominent presence in throughout the entire ceremony? Why was she given precedence over other people both male and female who have positions of honor and are members of the Royal Orders and have been for some time? There must be a reason she was chosen for this position. It was not random. She has some sway with the King, as you will see in a minute, she was given freedom to ignore protocell and tradition and create select her own garments (if we are to believe that). I believe that these garments were commissioned by the King to evoke very specific responses.
De Mordaunt Meaning
De Mordaunt name meaning is Investigator, Care Taker, Courage
Mortdaunt Earl of Peterburough & Monmouth Motto: Neither is he contented with Quiet Respose |
Coat of arms of Charles Mordaunt, 3rd Earl of Peterborough, KG, PC |
Mordaunt Family Crest, Coat of Arms and Name History |
Mordaunt: Mordaunt Coat of Arms and Family Crest Notebook Journal by … |
spacer
Penny Mordaunt: what her 85 days as defence secretary tell us about her
Analysis: Tory leader contender was first woman to hold post and is hoping trade and equalities experience will also play in favour
Tue 19 Jul 2022 07.22 EDT
Mordaunt had little time to leave a mark because she was abruptly sacked in July 2019 by Boris Johnson when he became prime minister.The ousted minister had supported his main rival, Jeremy Hunt, and was replaced by longtime Johnson backer Ben Wallace.
One former MoD source said a complaint from the department was that Mordaunt often focused on her other role as equalities minister,during which time she presented a detailed plan – already voted on in principle by MPs – to extend civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples.
At equalities, between April 2018 and July 2019, Mordaunt lists the release of a gender equalities roadmap, summarising the government’s existing aspirations for women’s rights and opportunities. But she does not list a more controversial 2018 consultation on a possible reform of the Gender Recognition Act, and how it could be made easier to transition.
Leaked documents over the weekend suggested ministers during her time in post had supported the removal of at least one of two medical requirements needed by people to change their gender.
Out of government, Mordaunt supported a campaign to create new emojis to help call out rude or bullying behaviour online. She was then appointed paymaster general in the Treasury in February 2020, and launched a consultation on a post-Covid national resilience strategy.
Penny Mordaunt Bilder / 276darinwaltonnews.blogspot.com
- Who is Penny Mordaunt’s former husband?
The Tory leadership hopeful met her former husband, Paul Murray, while they were mature students at Reading University.
After graduating with a 2:1 in philosophy in 1995, Ms Mordaunt married Mr Murray on July 31, 1999 – both aged 26
However, the marriage was short-lived as records show the pair divorced in 2000.
Is Penny Mordaunt married now?
Ms Mordaunt is not believed to be married now. However, she has been noted to have been dating classical singer Ian Lyon for a long period of time.
spacer
Penny Mordaunt, the ex-magician’s assistant looking to conjure up victory in PM race?
Penny Mordaunt, the Commons leader and a former magician’s assistant, will be looking to conjure up the necessary support and pull victory out of a hat in her second bid to become prime minister.
Twelve years of toing and froing, it is Ms Mordaunt’s previous career history that has raised the eyebrows of many.
Back in the day, among other work, she held the position of magician’s assistant. It came to light while she was on the Brexit campaign trail in Bournemouth, discussing her past life with fellow Brexiteers Michael Gove and Conor Burns. She noted how “she had been sawn in half and chopped to bits in several Bournemouth hotel ballrooms”, the Bournemouth Echo reported in 2017. This came as a result of her work alongside magicians Will Ayling, who was once president of the Magic Circle. Other interesting moments in Ms Mordaunt’s career include when she appeared in ITV’s celebrity diving series Splash!. Ms Mordaunt was born in Devon in 1973, the daughter of a former paratrooper and special needs teacher, and has a twin brother. She has Labour Party blood running in her veins — distantly related to the late Angela Lansbury, and so similarly related to the former Labour leader George Lansbury. Source |
spacer
Penny Mordaunt,
Before Tuesday’s meeting of bishops, Penny Mordaunt urged them to let parishes and clergy conduct weddings for same-sex couples. Photograph: Marc Mueller/EPA
A person familiar with the bishops’ discussions said: “The weight of opinion is for change, but final discussions will be over the level of change.”
There have been calls for parliamentary intervention if the C of E – the national church – fails to move towards the law and public opinion.
Bradshaw said: “If the church can’t do this itself, its exemption from the law as allowed under the Equality Act needs to be removed by parliament.”
Well that might be the best thing possible. They should not be looking to government they should be under GOD!! Special status with the government gives the government influence over GOD’s CHURCH!
Tony Baldry, a former Conservative MP, government minister and Second Church Estates Commissioner, said last week: “I have little doubt that if the church cannot find a way forward that enables clergy either to marry same-sex couples or to bless their weddings, MPs will soon feel the need to intervene.”
Polling carried out last year for the Ozanne Foundation, which campaigns for equality, found that 55% of people in England who identify as Anglican believe same-sex marriage is “right”. Younger people are more likely to share this view. Just 29% think it is “wrong”.
If that is indeed the case, the CHURCH has failed to educate and disciple God’s children!! We should not compound that by giving into the demand of the ungodly!
Sacrificing her trans beliefs on the altar of power makes her weak
Right-wingers appear not to be terribly keen on Penny Mordaunt. Toby Young read her book Greater: Britain After the Storm and didn’t like what he found. Nor did Will Lloyd, over at UnHerd, who wrote that: ‘Mordaunt tacks to the centre, but ends up on the managerial left. What she writes sounds like it was dredged from a particularly poor speech given at Davos five years ago.’ Sam Ashworth-Hayes even goes so far as to suggest she would be better suited to leading the Labour party. Here we must draw the line. The Labour party is more than capable of anointing its own ideologically unsuited leaders, thank you very much.
To her conservative critics, Mordaunt is not just liberal: she’s alarmingly woke.They despair that a sizeable section of the rank-and-file seems to love her. (Whether it actually loves her or reckons a female Heracles is needed to clean out the Johnsonian stables is another matter.) A cursory glimpse through Mordaunt’s record of pronouncements and positions would suggest these objections are more than swivel-eyed demands for ideological purity. Her views do seem out of step with the Tory mainstream, though they are far from anywhere near coherent enough for a philosophy. She is the sort of woolly, issue-centric, vaguely progressive Tory first heralded by the Cameron-Osborne project.
The case against Mordaunt isn’t that she’s a raging lefty but that a)she has held certain progressive views that should trouble left and right alike, and b) she was willing to toss them overboard at her earliest convenience. One of the most break-neck – some would say brass-neck – U-turns in recent political history was a Twitterthreadon gender ideology that Mordaunt posted at the outset of her leadership campaign. It represented not so much a disavowal of her past statements but a pretence that they never happened. She claimed she had ‘challenged the trans orthodoxy’, adding:
Penny Mordaunt
@PennyMordaunt
Yes I do. I am a woman. (here’s a recent pic on me in from @thetimes. I always dress in a swimsuit for the newspapers. Like many of you, I’m used to being patronised & misrepresented. Thank you @PN_TomCotterill for calling it out |
It is not the cynicism but the cowardice that disqualifies Mordaunt
These would be shocking enough declarations from any Conservative MP, hinting as they do at political priorities beyond raising taxes on working-age people and preventing them from owning a home. From Mordaunt, they are especially shocking because they represent a complete volte-face.After all, it was Mordaunt who, as a government minister, stood up in the Commons and recited the Nicene Creed of gender ideology: trans men are men and trans women are women.
Leading for the government in a 2021 debate on the Ministerial and other Maternity Allowances Act,Mordaunt linked the trans rights movement to the historical gay and lesbian liberation struggle. She said MPs ‘cringe’ at things their predecessors said about gays but challenged them: ‘Would we have gone out of our way to send our support, empathy and understanding to gay people at the time?’ After all, she added: ‘The challenge for us today is exactly the same with trans people’.
In the same debate, Mordaunt addressed Lords amendments to the Bill which replaced the government’s gender-neutral language with references to ‘mothers’ and ‘expectant mothers’.Mordaunt told the House the government was accepting the amendments, adding:
[B]ut let me say in supporting them from this dispatch box that trans men are men and trans women are women, and great care has been taken in the drafting and accepting of these amendments to ensure that that message has got across.
I disagreed then and I disagree now. I want everyone to enjoy the maximum freedom short of their neighbourhood resembling some of the grislier scenes from The Purge. I want everyone to live happy, fulfilling lives, to be at ease with who they are, and to find someone to love and cherish and bicker with in Ikea every Saturday. But gender identity theory, and in particular self-identification, is post-modernist, anti-materialist, counter-Enlightenment woowoo. Sex is biological and binary.Notions of gender can coexist with it but they cannot rewrite or replace it.
Gender theory and self-identification are the epitome of progressivism, a retrograde and destructive ideology that has made great advances by gutting liberalism and wearing its skin.Mordaunt has a Blairish fondness for ‘modernising’ – or rather a Cameronish fondness for mimicking Blairite buzzwords – and her election as leader would be quite the landmark in modernisation. The Tories would have given us the first woman prime minister and the first prime minister who doesn’t know what a woman is.
Except Mordaunt suddenly does know. At her launch speech, she quipped: ‘I think it was Margaret Thatcher who said that every prime minister needs a Willie. A woman like me doesn’t have one.’ All it took was a glimpse of No. 10 for Mordaunt to turn from Judith Butler into Julie Bindel. It is this transformation that casts the greatest doubt on Mordaunt as a leader, of the Conservative party or the country.If you believethat trans people are in a struggle comparable to gay liberation, that they merit solidarity and that those who fail to extend it will be judged harshly by history, why would you abandon them on the cusp of attaining the highest possible office from which to help them?
Sure, you could justify it as a tactical retreat, pandering to people who wouldn’t vote for you otherwise in order to win. But do you really need to do it with Thatcher-era puns about Willie Whitelaw and male members? And doesn’t ditching the trans cause only heap on more stigma, making it harder to bring about change? It is not the cynicism but the cowardice that disqualifies Mordaunt.Faced with the fearsome foe that is a few hundred colleagues, she folded on the one discernible principle she has espoused in politics. Is that what Tories want in a leader? Is it what Britons want in a prime minister?
EXACTLY MY MESSAGE ABOUT THE CHURCH… IT IS COWARDICE TO SACRIFICE THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD AND THE PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIANITY OUT OF FEAR OF BULLYING FROM THE OPPOSING SIDE!
spacer
…what she is demanding from the bishops is theologically very awkward. The biblical view of homosexuality is admittedly convoluted, but one thing is clear: the disapproval of it which lies behind the prohibition of same-sex unions is not simply some kind of hoary Old Testament taboo which any enlightened worshipper can airily sidestep.
In scripture there is a consistent view of marriage as a special mystical relationship – rather more than just a commitment between two people who happen to be sexually attracted to one another. And there is Paul’s disapproval of sexual relations, whether same-sex or opposite-sex, outside marriage. To say that this all should be set aside by a vote of prelates, and that the Anglican hierarchy from now on not only condone, but actively approve and encourage relationships that scripture regards as a sin, is a big ask.
Despite the fact that Mordaunt has called for a re-examination of the church’s theology, it’s not as if her arguments are particularly theological. On the contrary, they are overwhelmingly and boringly secular. Parliament, she says, has approved same-sex marriage: so, therefore, should the church. Letting the matter ‘fester’ – her words for not agreeing to her demands – would detract from the church’s ‘positive contribution’ to society (unspecified, but presumably in the nature of comforting words and glorified social work). There should be uniformity of rights across the UK: if churches in Scotland and Wales have done it, so should the CoE. ‘As a Unionist,’ she says, she would ‘value consistency.’
Miss Mordaunt is undoubtedly well-meaning. But what we have here is a perverse upending of the Lord’s Prayer: not so much a plea for God’s will to be done on earth, as for the church to embrace the values of the world. If church doctrine on sex makes LGBT people feel uncomfortable, then it is up to the church to change it to accommodate them.
Hitherto we had been led to believe that it was the function of the church to welcome sinners (a term including not only LGBT people but all of us)and give us the chance of forgiveness.Now, apparently, its job is to amend the definition of sin and say that at least in some cases we don’t need forgiveness after all. If this is right, why bother with religion at all?
But leave the theology of gay marriage aside for a moment.Whether she is right or wrong, Miss Mordaunt’s peremptory call for the CoE to adopt and welcome it as part of its doctrine is poised to destabilise further the already fraught relation between church and state.Establishment already carries with it a need for highly cautious coexistence. Bishops do not, at least officially, tell people which political party to vote for; ministers rightly admonish them if they do.
As a quid pro quo, however, government should not be seen to dictate doctrine to churchmen or tell them what to believe. Unfortunately Penny Mordaunt has come close to doing just that. She is a government minister. She could quite properly have written to the bishop in her private capacity but did not, choosing instead to use her official constituency stationery,and to make demands which she knew could not be fulfilled without a change in church doctrine.
This is likely to make life more difficult for the church, and in particular for the delicate balance of establishment. If the bishops do not follow her lead, it will be seen as creating an open and embarrassing rift between Westminster and Lambeth. But if they do, things could get even worse. True, if the church’s stance on same-sex marriage changes, a few LGBT activists might drift back into urban pewsand Mordaunt’s more fervent supporters would fall silent. One suspects, however, that many more worshippers would despair of the Anglican church’s latest bend to the winds of progressive politics and just walk away. Some completely, some in the direction of Rome and others to bodies like the Free Church of England. And this is before we contemplate further splits within the priesthood, involving either special treatment for those who cannot in conscience approve same-sex unions, or simple schism.
Even though bishops have voted against same-sex marriages, what will grow is the call for disestablishment. However picturesque it is a Christmas and Easter, a church split on major issues of theology, apt to bow to pressure from government ministers and political activists, has little if any convincing claim to participate in our government.
But there remains one chink of light. Disestablishment, however immediately shocking, might ultimately benefit the church. Think of the US, where a constitutionally separated church is still much healthier than that in England. True, it would be ironic if this was an unintended consequence of misguided government pressure and a failure by the church hierarchy to distinguish the sacred from the profane. But God works in mysterious ways, and as He knows better than any of us, stranger things have happened.
spacer
There are multiple types of celebrants/clergy/priests/bishops who participated in the Coronation. I have no way of knowing who is who or what they represent. Here you can see that the main vestments have nothing on the back. You can see the 8 pointed stars on the altar skirt, well barely on the above photo. Below you can very clearly see the 8 pointed star symbol.
spacer
This is HEAVY. The connections and symbolism cannot be denied. This symbol is in some of the ‘Supposed’ most legit, kind and trustworthy organizations in America. For instance the Veterans of Foreign War (VFW) and The Boy Scouts of America. The later in which also uses the Fleur de Lis! Unrelated, yet always relevant, I was reading Hosea this week. Chapter 8, verse 7 says, “For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind: it hath no stalk; the bud shall yield no meal: if so be it yield, the strangers shall swallow it up.” That jumped out at me! Sowing the wind= Cloud Seeding. Reaping the Whirlwind is God’s wrath for doing so. The rest of the verse is about GMO crop seeds and non Citizens gobbling up what we have left.
January 14, 2014 at 6:14 PM
spacer