TAGS: Vaccinations, COVID Mandates, Medical Passports, Fines, Compliance, The Unvaxxed, Fourteenth Amendment, US Courts, Constitution, Cruise Lines, Challenges, Federal Register, Reconciliation Bill, CHAOS, Confusion, New World Order, Occult Numerology, Bankruptcy, Homeland Security, Microsoft, Governors
The saying “at sixes and sevens” has been around for a long time. You don’t hear it much in this “MODERN” age. But, it does pop up now and then. The phrase means a state of confusion, disorder/CHAOS! That certainly is an appropriate phrase for the world we find ourselves in today! The whole world is upside down! Topsy Turvey!
The COVID NIGHTMARE was dreamed up by the Ruling Elite. It is the tool they designed to resolve all the issues that had with RESISTANCE to the New World Order. They mistakenly believe that they can make us all willingly comply with their every demand. They do know the main holdouts will be those who KNOW GOD! Led by the Holy Spirit they cannot be deceived. The HOLY SPIRIT leads us to ALL TRUTH. In a world that is dominated by DECEPTION, that is a gift one cannot be without. Sixes and Sevens
This post is about the COVID Mandates and how they are being employed to scare people into submission or detroy them by cutting them off from all means of support and supply.
spacer
What’s the meaning of the phrase ‘At sixes and sevens’?
To be at sixes and sevens is to be at a state of confusion and disorder (As in CHAOS), or of disagreement between parties.
What’s the origin of the phrase ‘At sixes and sevens’?
The derivation of this phrase is rather difficult to trace, not least because it has changed in both form and meaning over the nine centuries or so that it has been in use. The phrase was originally ‘to set on six and seven’ and is thought to have derived in the 14th century from the game of dice. The meaning then was ‘to carelessly risk one’s entire fortune‘. The earliest citation in print is Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, 1374:
“Lat nat this wrechched wo thyn herte gnawe, But manly set the world on sexe and seuene.”
‘Six and seven’ is probably a corruption of ‘cinque and six’, French for the numerals five and six. Some may feel that this is a step too far, and the theory does set the folk-etymology antennae twitching. The OED supports the idea though, which will be good enough authority for most people.
If things had stayed that way the origin of the phrase would be fairly cut and dried and there would be little more to say. As we know though, it is now given as ‘at sixes and sevens’, having mutated via ‘at six and seven’, and the current meaning refers to a state of confusion, disorder or disagreement, not one of risk.
There’s no question of these different versions arising independently; the movement from one to another was gradual and they overlap each other in time. The first appearance in print of ‘at six and seven’ is in 1535 and the last citation of ‘on six and seven’ in 1601. The first appearance of ‘at sixes and sevens’ was in 1670, in Leti’s Il cardinalismo di Santa Chiesa, translated or, as the subtitle of the work helpfully notes, ‘faithfully Englished’ by G. H., 1670:
“They leave things at sixes and sevens.”
There are two other stories that contend for the honour of being the source of this phrase (or one of the versions of it at least). One is the biblical text – Job 5:19 (King James Version):
“He shall deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch thee.”
Other than being old and including the numbers six and seven, this doesn’t seem to make a very strong claim. Chaucer would though have been familiar with earlier versions of this Bible story in Latin.
The other is an appealing tale. The medieval Livery Companies that were established in London include The Worshipful Company of Merchant Taylors (Tailors) and The Worshipful Company of Skinners (Fur Traders). The precedence of the companies was set in 1515, but these two companies disputed their positions and a compromise was agreed by which they exchange sixth and seventh place each year, at Easter. (Sounds to me like these two companies are Masonic and the exchange or changing of places on “Easter” definitely has a spiritual significance. Notice the animals on top of each of the crests shown above.)
Given that the Chaucer quotation is earlier, the Livery Company story can’t be the source of ‘set on six and seven’. It is quite possible though that, having the existing phrase, the coincidence of the dispute being between the sixth and seventh places caused the migration in meaning. If that is in fact what happened then it could be argued that this is how the present day phrase originated.
spacer
spacer
spacer
Sept 22 (Reuters) – The Biden administration announced on Sept. 9 (or 9/9) steps that will require tens of millions of Americans who have declined COVID-19 vaccines to get a shot as infection rates remain elevated, straining hospitals and weighing on economic growth.
Already, universities, local governments and businesses have mandated vaccinates for employees and students, which has prompted lawsuits.
Below are some key cases.
1) Employees fighting mandates and termination
Many large U.S. employers have announced mandates, including Walmart Inc (WMT.N), Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O) and the federal government. read more
Legal experts have said requiring vaccines is one way an employer can meet its duty to reduce workplace hazards such as COVID-19.
The cases against private businesses generally allege that mandates violate the right to bodily integrity under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
So far, the lawsuits have failed to gain traction.
A federal judge in Houston on June 12 (or 6/12 or 6 + 6 + 6 or 666) ruled in favor of Houston Methodist Hospital and dismissed a case by 117 workers who alleged the hospital was violating Texas’s wrongful termination law by linking their job to a COVID-19 shot. The judge determined the mandate did not violate public policy or amount to coercion. read more
2) Challenges to mandates for students and teachers
More than 500 colleges and universities have imposed vaccine requirements and many have been challenged in court, sometimes for denying student requests to refuse the vaccine on religious grounds.
In the most detailed ruling, a federal judge said Indiana University acted reasonably to protect public health by requiring vaccines, or masking and testing, and declined to issue an injunction blocking the requirements. The judge said students could choose to attend a different school or postpone their education if they did not want to take a vaccine. read more
Federal courts in similar cases have sided with the University of Massachusetts and University of Connecticut.
3) Lawsuits over state vaccine requirements
At least 24 (or 6X4 or 6666) states have directed some healthcare workers to get COVID-19 vaccines, sparking legal challenges.
Local governments ranging from Los Angeles to North Charleston, South Carolina, also have been sued over vaccines requirements imposed on their employees. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio was sued over a requirement that customers prove they have had a COVID-19 shot before entering restaurants, theaters and gyms.
There have only been preliminary rulings, as many cases were filed in recent weeks.
A federal judge in Albany temporarily ordered New York state officials to allow religious exemptions for a state-imposed vaccine mandate on healthcare workers, which begins to take effect on Sept. 27 (or 9 7 7) .
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd (NCLH.N) convinced a federal judge in Miami on Aug. 8 (or 88) to prevent Florida officials from enforcing a state ban on “vaccine passports.” The ruling allowed the cruise line to require passengers boarding its ships in Florida to prove they had been vaccinated, without fear the company would be fined by state officials. read more
24.3K15:55 To Watch This Video On BitChute Click the Title Link Below:
Over 13K Views in less than 24 hours: Another “Must Watch” video. Please share and repost by any means necessary. Copy & Paste and send it to everybody on your email list. With Big Tech constantly censoring us on social media, emailing videos like these to friends is about the only way we can get the messages out. This is the ONLY way we can defeat the CCP and the NWO.
Share across all globalist controlled platforms. Do not keep them on safe platforms because most people on those platforms are already woke to the lies of the New World Order agenda! Copy & Paste and send to your friends via text message on your mobile device or email it to all of your contacts. If you do not share this on other platforms it becomes an echo chamber. 1 month, 1 week ago
It’s going global. 2 weeks, 5 days ago
spacer
President Joe Biden didn’t just announce a Covid-19 vaccine mandate on companies employing 100 or more people, he plans to enforce it.
On Saturday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s House quietly tucked an enforcement mechanism into their $3.5 trillion “reconciliation” bill, passed it out of the Budget Committee, and sent it to the House floor.
Buried on page 168 of the House Democrats’ 2,465-page mega bill is a tenfold increase in fines for employers that “willfully,” “repeatedly,” or even seriously violate a section of labor law that deals with hazards, death, or serious physical harm to their employees.
The increased fines on employers could run as high as $70,000 for serious infractions, and $700,000 for willful or repeated violations—almost three-quarters of a million dollars for each fine. If enacted into law, vax enforcement could bankrupt non-compliant companies even more quickly than the $14,000 (or 14, or 2 x 7 or 77) OSHA fine anticipated under Biden’s announced mandate.
The Biden Administration has already started implementing its vaccine mandate enforcement blueprint:
- The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) set precedent this summer and published an emergency Covid-19 rule in the Federal Register taking jurisdiction over and providing justification for Covid-19 being a workplace hazard for healthcare employment.
- Early in September, Biden announced his 100-or-more employee Covid-19 vaccine mandate and tasked OSHA with drafting an enforcement rule to exert emergency vaccine compliance authority over companies with 100 or more employees.
- The legislative provision that passed the Budget Committee raises the OSHA fines for non-compliance 10 times higher – and up to $700,000 for each “willful” or “repeated” violation. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not announced when the House will vote on the reconciliation bill that includes the new OSHA fines.
- If the legislation is enacted, OSHA could levy draconian fines to enforce Biden’s vaccine mandate, a move that could rapidly bankrupt non-compliant companies. The Biden mandate affects employers collectively employing an estimated 80 million workers.
The Democrats are playing hardball.
President Biden embraced an aggressive stance earlier this month when he challenged Republicans who are threatening lawsuits over what they decry as his federal overreach: “Have at it. … We’re playing for real here. This isn’t a game.”
The Legislation
The provision tucked in the House reconciliation budget bill (on page 168) that increases OSHA fines reads:
SEC. 21004. ADJUSTMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES.
(a) OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970.—Section 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 666) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking ‘‘$70,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$700,000’’; and
(B) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000’’;
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘$7,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$70,000’’; and
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘$7,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$70,000’’
That provision would change existing law relating to OSHA’s enforcement fines, the very same section of law whose fines OSHA referenced in its June Covid-19 healthcare worker rule and is likely to use again to enforce its forthcoming vaccine compliance rules.
The Existing Law
29 U.S.C.§ 666 lays out OSHA enforcement fine levels. The 1970-enacted law reads:
29 U.S. Code § 666 – Civil and criminal penalties
(a) Willful or repeated violation Any employer who willfully or repeatedly violates the requirements of section 654 of this title, any standard, rule, or order promulgated pursuant to section 655 of this title, or regulations prescribed pursuant to this chapter may be assessed a civil penalty of not more than $70,000 for each violation, but not less than $5,000 for each willful violation
(b) Citation for serious violation Any employer who has received a citation for a serious violation of the requirements of section 654 of this title, of any standard, rule, or order promulgated pursuant to section 655 of this title, or of any regulations prescribed pursuant to this chapter, shall be assessed a civil penalty of up to $7,000 for each such violation [emphasis added].
Each year, OSHA adjusts these penalties for inflation, so for 2021, the fines are not actually capped at $70,000 and $7,000, but $136,532 and $13,653 per violation. If House Democrats get their way, by enacting the page 168 changes, those fines would increase to $700,000 for willful and repeated violations and $70,000 for serious violations.
Section 654, cross-referenced in the OSHA enforcement penalty code, outlines the law requiring workplaces to be “free from recognized hazards” causing harm or death:
29 U.S. Code § 654 – Duties of employers and employees
(a) Each employer—
(1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees;
(2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this chapter.
(b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this chapter which are applicable to his own actions and conduct [emphasis added].
OSHA has already published a rule this year claiming Covid-19 is a workplace hazard, and the agency is using this provision of law to assert and enforce its authority. It is likely the new rule to enforce Biden’s mandate will also use this authority, and by extension use the fines upon enforcement.
Huge Crippling OSHA Fines, Likely By Design
The crippling change described on page 168 of the Democrats’ bill isn’t a typo or a clerical error. It was inserted by design and, likely, with the hope that no one would notice before Democrats ram the bill through Congress.
If enacted, it could bankrupt a whole host of companies that do not believe they should have to comply with the Biden administration’s mandate or harbor the cost of intrusive, weekly tests.
In its June 2021 emergency rule affecting health care workers, OSHA complained it was having a hard time motivating employers with its paltry $13,653 fine:
“OSHA has been limited in its ability to impose penalties high enough to motivate the very large employers who are unlikely to be deterred by penalty assessments of tens of thousands of dollars, but whose noncompliance can endanger thousands of workers …”
The Critics
Some have openly discussed businesses defying the mandate and taking their risks with OSHA fines. For example, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) tweeted that businesses “should openly rebel” against any OSHA rule.
It’s one thing to defy a $14,000 fine. It’s quite another to risk incurring hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. One or two disgruntled employees, for example, could bring an employer $70,000-$140,000 in OSHA fines. If considered “willful,” as per Rep. Roy’s tweet — just three “violations” could quickly become a $2.1 million OSHA fine.
Conclusion:
If its provision becomes law, the Biden administration may force American businesses to choose between vaccinating their employees, testing them weekly for Covid-19, or going bankrupt under crippling OSHA fines.
In September, Biden warned the tens of millions of Americans who have declined vaccination against Covid-19, “We’ve been patient. But our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us.”
Now the Democrats in the House are hoping to make employers foot the bill for that “cost” in the form of fines and bankruptcy.
Republicans might want to read page 168 of the Democrats’ bill. After all, as we like to say at OpenTheBooks.com, the text of the bill is online in real time.
Additional Reading:
29 U.S. Code § 666 – Civil and criminal penalties.
29 U.S. Code § 654 – Duties of employers and employees, referenced in 29 U.S.C. § 666
“How OSHA Can Conjure Biden’s Soft Vaccine Mandate: Explained” Sept. 14, 2021
“Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS) and COVID-19,” Congressional Research Services, Updated September 13, 2021,
OSHA, “Occupational Exposure to Covid-19; Emergency Temporary Standard,” 86 Federal Register 32376, June 21, 2021.
OSHA Penalties as of Jan. 15, 2021, U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
OSHA Memo on Annual Penalty Adjustments, Department of Labor
Note: We reached out to the White House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and OSHA for comment.
Tim, Ian, and Lydia join YouTuber and commentator Joey Salads to scrutinize how, exactly, President Biden intends to ram through his hugely unconstitutional mandate for Covid vaccinations for workers.
Guest: Joey Saladino @Joey Saladino Show (YouTube)
Hosts: Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere)Lydia @SourPatchLyds (Twitter, Minds), @RealSourPatchLyds (Gab, Instagram)
Podcast available on iTunes and Spotify, coming soon to all podcast platforms! 2 weeks, 5 days ago
spacer
This next video is the one that got me started on this post. DON’T MISS IT!
Sep 28, 2021
Summary of H.R. 666 (115th): Department of Homeland …
H.R.666 – 115th Congress (2017-2018): Department of …
New World Order 666 The Mark Of The Beast Vol 1
H.R. 666 and the Assault on the Bill of Rights | GOA
Does House Bill 6666 (the TRACE Act) Allow the Government …
Does Microsoft Own Patent ‘666’ About Implanting …
ORDER RIGHT NOW!! https://mypatriotsupply.com/pages/rs-repdig-4-week-emergency-food-supply-richie-from-boston-may-2020?rfsn=1750310.2a7b74&subid=RFB.Richie.From.Boston
INOVIO https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/inovio-receives-authorization-to-conduct-phase-3-efficacy-trial-of-its-covid-19-dna-vaccine-candidate-ino-4800/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-biotech-firm-inovio-reports-encouraging-virus-vaccine-results/
To Watch This Video On BitChute: Click Here
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
We live and move in the physical realm, so we must deal with physical things. But, the BATTLE is really in the spirit. Get right with GOD and STAND for WHAT GOD CALLS RIGHT! What God CALLS GOOD!
When you stand up for GOD and HIS WORD… GUESS WHAT? HE fights for YOU!!
Here is some information on the states that are standing up for our Rights and Freedom and for the Truth of GOD. Is your state on the list?
Audrey Conklin from FOX News reports, Republican attorneys general (AGs) from 24 states are threatening to take legal action against Joe Biden’s coronavirus vaccine requirement. 1 week, 4 days ago
Are you pleasantly surprised to see so many states on that list? I know I am! So, BE BOLD, BE STRONG, FOR THE LORD OUR GOD IS WITH US!!
spacer