THEY ARE ABOUT TO MAKE THEIR CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA THE LAW OF THE WHOLE EARTH!! PUNISHABLE BY DEATH IF ANYONE DARES TO QUESTION OR DISOBEY! IT IS THE NEW LAW, AND THE NEW RELIGION. YOU MUST WORSHIP THE ‘SCIENCE’. THIS BECOMES REALITY AT THE UN Climate Change Conference – United Arab Emirates 30 November until 12 December 2023.
I have to tell you that I have seldom had as many attacks as I have while working on this post. Whew. The devil tried very hard to make me give up. He did manage to make me lose some important information but, he could not stop me from completing my task. I can’t even tell you how many times I would be working on a lead and something would take me away from my desk, when I’d get back it would be gone. I had to search through the History to figure out where I came across it and try to find it again. I had to start over three times because my work got erased completely, no where to be found. My computer shut down, I got locked out of my webpage, I was sick to my stomach, I can’t even remember all that happened today.
But, this is an important post. There are people out there who really need this information. Some of you have friends and family who have no clue what is about to happen. If they believe the Plandemic is real, or that Climate Change is due to CO2, they need to learn the truth before it is too late. We can’t stop the New World Order from coming…but we can help wake people up so that they have a chance to be saved.
They are about to finalize their commitment and lower the hammer on the WORLD. We are already seeing what looks like the beginning of WWIII. The good supply is nearly dried up. Some Banks are closing, some are just locking up their accounts, some are already moving to the new banking system. some are already enforcing the NEW DIGITL ID SYTEM. The Anti Christ is waiting in the wings. The Euphrates River is nearly completely dried up. The Red Heifer is ready. The JEWS are CLAMORING for the TEMPLE to be built. Persecution of Christians is advancing all across the Earth. Brother is turning against brother, Friends are dying at the hands of their Friends, madness is overpowering the lost. BUT, at the same time, many are coming to Christ. Even Muslims and Gang Members. We are at the end and things will get darker before the DAWN!
I am working hard to try and show people that CLIMATE CHANGE is a HOAX that has been perpetrated upon us. What you are seeing manifest in the Earth is at the hands of those who HATE YOU.
My post from the other day, PROOF: They will, they are, they can, they have and they DO! Demonstrated how Saudi Arabia is letting the cat out of the bag and revealing the truth about Weather Modification. Today, we cover more information on the US use of Weather Modification and it’s true purpose. From the very beginning it was created to be a WEAPON!!
It has been used to break the backs of the American People for years now.
Here is the proof:
In their “race against time” to become a TYPE One Civilization it is unlikely that scientists will let a silly thing like humanity get in their way. They are eager to be the MASTERS of this planet, controlling weather, volcanos, Hurricanes, Tornados, capturing all the Sun, and whizzing their way through the Galaxy and beyond.
SCIENTISTS ABHOR AND CONSTRAINTS OR RESTRICTIONS! They believe they should be free to push the envelope, no matter the consequences.
WE HAVE HEARD MICHIO KAKA TELL US TIME AN AGAIN THAT THEIR GOAL IS TO BECOME A TYPE ONE CIVILIZATION. WE HAVE ALSO HEARD HIM SAY THERE IS A SMALL WINDOW OF TIME TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. SO, WHY WOULD YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE NOT DOING EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO GET THERE? WHICH MEANS THEY ARE WORKING OVERTIME TO MAKE CONTROLLING THE WEATHER AND HARNESSING THE SUN REALITY?
A Type-1 civilization has harnessed its planetary power. They control earthquakes, the weather, volcanoes, they have cities on the ocean, anything planetary – they control. That’s Type-1 civilization.
One of the world’s leading scientists has made a shocking confession on live TV when he accidentally admitted that the recent “man-made” hurricanes have been artificially created through secret government weather modification.During an interview on mainstream media outlet CBS news, Physicist Dr. Michio Kaku said that the skies have been sprayed with nano particles and storms are then “activated” using “lasers”.
Read more at: http://www.nnettle.com/news/2682-top-scientist-admits-on-live-tv-recent-hurricanes-are-man-made
© Neon Nettle
Top Scientist Tells CBS: HAARP Responsible For Recent Hurricanes – What is Cloud Seeding?
World renowned physicist Dr. Michio Kaku made a shocking confession on live TV when he admitted that HAARP is responsible for the recent spate of hurricanes.
In an interview aired by CBS, Dr. Kaku admitted that recent ‘made-made’ hurricanes have been the result of a government weather modification program in which the skies were sprayed with nano particles and storms then “activated” through the use of “lasers”.
In the interview (below), Michio Kaku discusses the history of weather modification, before the CBS crew stop him in his tracks.
The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) was created in the early 1990’s as part of an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
According to government officials, HAARP allows the military to modify and weaponize the weather, by triggering earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes.
Anongroup.org reports: One detail in a plethora of academic papers and patents about altering the weather with electromagnetic energy and conductive particles in the stratosphere, research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences said the “laser beams” can create plasma channels in air, causing ice to form. According to Professor Wolf Kasparian:
“Under the conditions of a typical storm cloud, in which ice and supercooled water coexist, no direct influence of the plasma channels on ice formation or precipitation processes could be detected.
Under conditions typical for thin cirrus ice clouds, however, the plasma channels induced a surprisingly strong effect of ice multiplication.
Within a few minutes, the laser action led to a strong enhancement of the total ice particle number density in the chamber by up to a factor of 100, even though only a 10−9 fraction of the chamber volume was exposed to the plasma channels.
The newly formed ice particles quickly reduced the water vapor pressure to ice saturation, thereby increasing the cloud optical thickness by up to three orders of magnitude.”
To really understand geoengineering, researchers have identified defense contractors Raytheon, BAE Systems, and corporations such as General Electric as being heavily involved with geoengineering. According to Peter A. Kirby, Massachusetts has historically been a center of geoengineering research.
With the anomalous hurricanes currently ravaging the Americas, floods destroying India, and wildfires destroying the Pacific Northwest, weather warfare is a topic on the public consciousness right now. Please share this with as many people as possible.
CAN WE ALTER THE WEATHER DR. MICHIO KAKU (2013)
US2550324A – Process for controlling weather
Google Patents
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
n 2025, US aerospace forces can own the weather by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible.
spacer
Weather Modification 2025 Time to Start Countdown
Academia.edu
https://www.academia.edu › Weather_Modification_2…
“In 1996, US armed forces were presented with the striking research titled “Owning the Weather in 2025” under Project Air Force 2025. This research outlined the strategy to use weather modification not only as a force multiplier to accomplish military objectives in battlefield, but also to achieve capability of altering “global weather patterns by influencing their determining factors” in the next 30 years.” 1
3. Despite of existing weaponization of weather programmes and events of deliberate destruction of environment, not a single country has been convicted under ENMOD since its enforcement.
6. Its Review Conference Mechanism (Article 8) is totally ineffective and since 1977, only two conferences took place in 1984 and 1992 without any concrete contribution. These review conferences should be convened after every five years [Article 8 (1)]
The modification of weather is a crawling threat which has been totally neglected from last four decades. Discussion on the military use of weather modification techniques by US is a taboo in international arena and usually termed as conspiracy theory or fake propaganda. Renvision and implementation of ENMOD is an urgent need of time and if it’s not being done, then the time is not far away that the global climate will be controlled by a single country to be used against humanity. If US possessed a capability to develop a tropical storm seven decades ago, one can only guess what kind of advance technology it might have in 2025?
We Will Bury You In Mud: Owning the Weather... – Dick Atlee
Forget Bush’s National Missile Shield. The best military defense is a Russian winter. It got the better of King Charles XII of Sweden, sent Napoleon packing, and eventually shooed Hitler away. A few years after that, though, it was the Germans that were favored by the weather gods—for weeks, Patton’s Third Army was stuck near the edge of Germany, plagued by rain that kept American tanks and trucks and soldiers in place. The general’s solution? A prayer to those gods:
Almighty and most merciful Father, we humbly beseech Thee, of Thy great goodness, to restrain these immoderate rains with which we have had to contend. Grant us fair weather for Battle. Graciously hearken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that, armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory, and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies and establish Thy justice among men and nations.1
Patton was certainly not the first military leader to beseech His Great Goodness for favorable conditions. When Hannibal invaded Italy in 217 BC, he waited for the marshes to freeze so his mounted troops could pour in. In 1776, the harsh winter helped George Washington’s army, letting it move quickly across the frozen Delaware River. And in 1941, the Japanese essentially hid their aircraft carriers moving toward Pearl Harbor in a large Pacific storm.
But, to paraphrase Mark Twain, everybody prayed about the weather, but nobody did anything about it. That changed in 1946, when General Electric scientists Vincent Schaefer and Irving Langmuir created an artificial cloud by introducing dry ice into a freezer, and then developed a technique for “cloud seeding,” still used today.
By the late 1950s, people began to think about our new ability to alter the weather in military terms. The Cold War was kicking into high gear, and the US intelligence community became aware that the Soviets were experimenting with cloud seeding and other kinds of weather control, such as cloud dissipation. In 1957, Henry Houghton, chair of MIT’s meteorology department, noted, “I shudder to think of the consequences of a prior Russian discovery of a feasible method for weather control.”2 That same year, a Presidential Advisory Committee on Weather Control noted (with perfect deadpan sensationalism) that, “weather modification could become a more important weapon than the atom bomb.”3 The weather race, though never as fierce or as public as the space race or the arms race, was on. (The Soviets really were working on weather, with the hopes of, among other things, warming its vast northern regions and removing the ice in the Arctic Sea.)
That any new technology that could be used as a weapon would be used as a weapon now seems obvious—a kind of first principle of warfare—but it is a relatively recent idea, a product of the “total war” strategy of the two world wars, where tactics and weaponry became increasingly more destructive. And there was historical precedent for offensive uses of the environment. During the Franco-Dutch War of 1672–1678, for example, the Dutch breached the dikes around Amsterdam, flooding part of the low-lying country and putting the French on the defensive. (The Dutch won.)
With the political and military stage set, the US got to work on figuring out how to alter the weather, and what to do with that knowledge. Much of the work seems to have been done at the Navy’s China Lake weapons research center. “Between 1949 and 1978,” the base’s in-house newspaper, The Rocketeer, reported, “China Lake developed concepts, techniques, and hardware that were successfully used in hurricane abatement, fog control, and drought relief.”4
“Drought relief” is an interesting way to put it. China Lake’s research caught the eye of the CIA in the early 1960s, which saw the potential of weather control in the rapidly expanding conflict in Vietnam. The CIA’s first use of the Navy’s technology was crowd dispersal. “The Diem regime was having all that trouble with the Buddhists,” an agent told Seymour Hersh in 1972. “They would just stand around during demonstrations when the police threw tear gas at them, but we noticed that when the rains came they wouldn’t stay on. The agency got an Air America Beechcraft and had it rigged up with silver iodide. There was another demonstration and we seeded the area. It rained.”5
In 1966, the idea of raining on Vietnam became the top-secret Project Popeye, which ran for some seven years and included more than 2,600 cloud-seeding flights over Vietnam and Laos. The objective was simple: Make rain that would make or keep the Ho Chi Minh Trail—a main supply route for the North Vietnamese—so muddy that it was unusable. (Why “Popeye”? The artificially created rain was apparently called “Olive Oil.”)
The story of the top-secret project—flown by the Air Force but controlled by the CIA and the White House—was broken in 1971 in Jack Anderson’s national newspaper column, then, to greater fanfare, in July 1972, with Hersh’s front-page story in the New York Times. And while there were no rules at the time about weather modification—or any environmental warfare, for that matter—the Nixon administration was not happy with Hersh’s revelations. The White House and the State Department declined comment, and one unnamed official said, “This is one of those things where no one is going to say anything.”6 (People said even less about CIA weather modification in Cuba. During 1969 and 1970, planes from China Lake seeded clouds that rained over non-agricultural regions of Cuba, leaving at least some of the country’s sugar cane fields dry.)
The eventual response was an international treaty, the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, or ENMOD, which entered into force in 1978. The main tenet of the treaty, which stands today, is this: “Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.”7
Weather control activities seem to have quieted down after ENMOD, but fortunately for the US military, the treaty has a loophole big enough to drive a truck through: It prohibits only action with “widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.” When Air Force intelligence analysts turned their thoughts to the weather in the mid-1990s, they made up their own definition of these limits: widespread means affecting more than several hundred kilometers; long-lasting means for a period of months; and severe “involves serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural or economic resources, or other assets.”8 Which is to say that, except for the human life part, most military applications, which tend to be short-term and localized, are allowed. These analysts’ conclusions are contained in an extraordinary report, published in 1996, called “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” If the US intelligence community did ignore the weather for a while, “Owning the Weather” certainly made up for it. Envisioning a world where technology has made control over the local weather phenomena much more precise—and where a global network of sensors has greatly increased available atmospheric data—the writers declare that in three decades time, “US aerospace forces can ‘own the weather,’” and “shape the battlespace in ways never before possible.”9
While “Owning the Weather” relies primarily on extensions of existing weather modification techniques, the authors strike more boldly into the future with speculation about nanotechnology-based “artificial weather.” “A cloud, or several clouds, of microscopic computer particles,” they note, “all communicating with each other and with a larger control system could provide tremendous capability. Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions, such clouds could be designed to have a wide range of properties.”10
At times, the Air Force report reads like a declaration to violate the ENMOD agreement. The authors even note that the only reason they don’t discuss more serious weather control—made-to-order weather, large-scale climate modification, control of storms, etc.—is that it won’t be technically feasible by 2025. “Such applications would have been included in this report as potential military options,” they note, “despite their controversial and potentially malevolent nature and their inconsistency with standing UN agreements to which the US is a signatory.”11
Why is the United States so interested in the weather that it would violate international treaty? The answer may lie more in the psyche of the government than in specific tactical advantages. The US military has long been used to having a stacked deck. The US Navy once owned the seas; later, the Air Force had the run of the skies. For a while, our sole possession of the atomic and hydrogen bombs gave us the “ultimate” weapon. Dominion over the atmosphere might be the next “ultimate” weapon, proof not only of military invincibility but perhaps, finally, of Divine Right.
95 minutes
The weather might be the most important thing to humankind. It affects our moods, what clothes we wear, what foods we eat and how we live. Despite centuries of scientific victories that have enabled us to exert some control and “air condition” the elements out of our lives, we may never escape the weather.
The desire to modify the weather has been around forever; but the threat of catastrophic climate change, water wars, and intensifying hurricanes, a new breed of weather control emerged.
Mixing character-driven verité with the scope of an essay film, OWNING THE WEATHER tells the story of weather modification in the United States, from Charles Hatfield’s infamous rainmaking days to modern plans to engineer the climate.
There are more than fifty active weather modification programs in the United States alone. Through the eyes of key individuals on the front lines of a crucial but largely unknown debate, the film introduces the cloud seeders struggling for mainstream recognition, the “legitimate” scientists who doubt them, and the activists who decry any attempts to mess with Mother Nature.
Will the scientific renegades in the weather modification community ever shed the label of “snake-oil-salesman”? Will they succeed in securing government funding for the first time in decades? What does it mean to our society and our consciousness if there are no more acts of God?
Traversing vast ethical, political, and social currents, the film asks the question, “will we have to own the weather to save the planet?”
spacer
CiteSeerX
View the full document HERE: http://www.nuclearplanet.com/ian6.pdf
spacer
U.S. Military To Control The Weather Around The World By 2025
They have been planning this for decades
eather has always been a powerful force, capable of shaping the outcomes of battles and impacting societies. In recent years, there has been speculation about the United States military’s alleged pursuit of weather control capabilities, aiming to manipulate weather patterns worldwide by the year 2025. This ambitious objective, if true, raises numerous questions about the implications and feasibility of such a technology. This article explores the concept of weather control, its potential military applications, and the references made in the article “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” published by the Defense Technical Information Centre.
Understanding Weather Control Technology
Weather control, also known as weather modification or geoengineering, refers to the deliberate manipulation of natural weather patterns. It involves altering atmospheric conditions through various techniques, such as cloud seeding, ionization, or even the use of electromagnetic waves. The idea of weather control has been explored for decades, but significant progress has been made in recent years, leading to increased speculation about the U.S. military’s potential involvement.
The article “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” published by the Defense Technical Information Centre, delves into the concept of using weather control as a strategic advantage. It suggests that the U.S. military aims to harness weather manipulation as a force multiplier, enabling them to influence the outcomes of military operations. However, it is important to note that the article’s predictions and claims should be evaluated with a critical lens, as they may involve speculative scenarios rather than concrete plans.
While the idea of weather control may seem like science fiction, there have been real-world experiments and projects aimed at exploring its possibilities. For instance, cloud seeding, a technique involving the dispersion of substances into clouds to promote rainfall, has been employed in various regions to mitigate droughts. These experiments provide valuable insights into the potential of weather control technology, but they should not be conflated with the military’s alleged ambitions of global weather manipulation.
Potential Military Applications
The potential military applications of weather control technology are vast and multifaceted. One primary objective could be to enhance or disrupt communication systems by manipulating atmospheric conditions that affect radio waves and satellite signals. By controlling weather patterns, military forces could create strategic advantages by either enabling or impeding the enemy’s ability to coordinate operations effectively.
Another potential application lies in using weather control to weaken or incapacitate adversaries. For instance, the ability to trigger severe storms, hurricanes, or droughts could severely impact the agriculture and infrastructure of enemy nations, destabilizing their economies and diminishing their military capabilities. However, it is crucial to note that deploying such tactics raises ethical and humanitarian concerns, as they may result in collateral damage and indiscriminate suffering among civilian populations.
Additionally, weather control could be utilized to protect military assets and territories. By modifying weather patterns, the military could create advantageous conditions for its own operations while impeding enemy movements. This could involve generating fog or heavy rainfall to reduce visibility or creating strong wind patterns that disrupt aerial operations. However, the feasibility and effectiveness of such tactics on a large scale remain uncertain and would require extensive research and development.
Evaluating Feasibility and Challenges
Achieving global weather control by 2025, as suggested by the referenced article, presents significant technological and logistical challenges. Weather systems are incredibly complex and interconnected, making it difficult to predict and manipulate them on a large scale. Developing the capability to influence weather patterns across different geographical regions would require a thorough understanding of atmospheric dynamics, sophisticated modeling techniques, and substantial computing power. (all of which the US Government has fully developed. As well as ample experimentation with incredible data collection.)
Furthermore, weather control efforts must consider the potential unintended consequences and ecological impacts. (Only if that is a factor of concern. If loss of life and property is a minor consideration than nothing hinders the implementation of these technologies.) Altering weather patterns in one area may lead to unforeseen disruptions in other regions, affecting ecosystems, agricultural cycles, and water resources. Responsible deployment of weather control technology would necessitate careful consideration of its long-term effects and adherence to international agreements and environmental protocols.
It is essential to maintain a critical perspective when examining claims and predictions about the U.S. military’s ambitions regarding weather control. While it is plausible that research and development in this field are ongoing, the achievement of global weather control by 2025 may be an overly optimistic timeline. The practical and ethical considerations surrounding weather control technology demand thorough evaluation and public discourse to ensure responsible and beneficial applications.
Weather control technology remains an intriguing area of scientific research with potential military applications. The article “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” provides speculative insights into the possible intentions of the U.S. military. However, it is crucial to approach these claims with critical thinking, recognizing the challenges and uncertainties associated with achieving global weather control. Balancing the potential benefits with ethical considerations and ecological impacts is essential to ensure responsible use of such technology, if it were to become a reality in the future.
spacer
This next article is a FABULOUS SOURCE OF INFORMATION. Don’t Miss it! It was just to long to post here and to make it short enough you would lose so much valuable information. PLEASE VIST The Site by clicking the link in the box below.
spacer
Volcanoes Around The World
The map shows some volcanoes that have been active in the last 10,000 years. Many more active volcanoes are known to exist on the sea floor, shown here as paler areas in the oceans.
This pattern suggests that magma is only produced in certain places, particularly at the edges of the slowly-moving Tectonic Plates that form the outer layer (lithosphere) of our planet.
Yellow triangles have links to further information about individual volcanoes. Much more information can be found from a couple of sites in the ‘Useful Links‘ section.
spacer
https://www.wired.com/2012/04/could-people-trigger-a-volcanic-eruption-on-purpose/
If you are an evil genius bent on achieving world domination by causing a volcano to erupt on command, you need to read this post. Volcanologist Erik Klemetti outlines the steps and potential pitfalls while also explaining why all previous evil genius attempts at triggering volcanoes have failed.
OVER THE LAST few weeks, a number of disparate items converged in my mind. First, in my Petrology and Volcanology class here at Denison, we spent a week talking about what geologists know about triggers for volcanic eruptions. Secondly, I was asked some questions about Richard Branson’s April Fools’ joke regarding the supposed Virgin Volcanic that would send a manned submersible into a volcano. Put these two ideas together, and you get to wondering about that age-old question: Could we trigger a volcano to erupt on purpose? This has been the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theorists for decades (centuries?), the idea that humans could figure out a way to get a volcano that isn’t erupting to start erupting. Mostly, this is in the hands of evil scientists/lunatics who are bent on world domination (paging Dr. Horrible) or some last ditch effort to save the planet (as in Crack in the World).
The name of the game when it comes to starting an explosive volcanic eruption is pressure — or, more specifically, a drop in pressure. A simplified way to think of a volcano is like a champagne bottle with a cork. Keep that cork on and the bubbles in the champagne stay in solution. However, you remove that cork and all the dissolved carbon dioxide comes out of solution and bubbles form. Release that pressure fast enough and the bubbles form so quickly that you get that “pop” from the bottle. Build the pressure up in the bottle by shaking it and release the pressure and all that $500 bottle of champagne comes gushing out the top. That is, in a basic sense, what happens for an explosive eruption of a volcano — volcanic gases come out of solution as the pressure is released, forming bubbles that fragment the magma into ash and tephra. That pressure being released is what we call “lithostatic pressure,” that is the pressure caused by all the rocks above the magma. Lithostatic pressure goes up quite rapidly in the Earth — it takes 10 km of the Earth’s atmosphere to produce 1 “atmosphere” of pressure (what we feel at sea level). It only takes 4.4 meters of rock above you to exert the same force. Release enough of that lithostatic pressure and you release the cork. The ash plume is the “foom!” of champagne coming out of the bottle.
The other way you can get a magma to erupt, usually explosively, is the addition of outside water. Think about the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull — that eruption was made much more explosive by all the melted snow/ice on the volcano that mixed with the magma (however, it was likely triggered by an injection of new, hot magma). If the right ratio of water-to-magma exists, then the explosive mixing of magma and water can be self-sustaining, meaning that the explosive eruption will continue propagating until the supply of water or magma runs out. However, too little water means that you likely don’t sustain the explosive mixing, too much water and you quench (solidify) too much of the magma.
What could trigger an eruption?
There are many theories of what can trigger a volcano to erupt. Some are as simple as the buoyancy of magma — it is less dense than the surrounding rock, so it rises until it intersects the surface. Likely, this is only the dominant process as volcanoes that produce lava flows like Kilauea. If you want an explosive volcanic eruption, you want to produce bubbles (and lots of them) by (1) decompressing the magma, causing gases to come out of solution; (2) crystallizing minerals to concentrate water/volatiles in the remaining magma or (3) heating the magma with a new intrusion. A release in pressure can be accomplished a number of ways, including the failure of the roof above the magma body (a volcanic landslide is a great way), the buoyant rise of the magma or through some less common factors like melting of a glacier (likely too slow a process to trigger a specific eruption), excessive precipitation to erode the volcano, changes in atmospheric pressure or maybe even Earth tides caused by the pull of the Sun and Moon (rare, mostly in already active volcanoes). Once you’ve produced bubbles, you need to concentrate them towards the top of the magma body, maybe through a earthquake — think about shaking an open bottle of soda with bubbles on the side: They all float to the top. However, in all these cases, you likely need a volcano that is “primed” to erupt — that is, one that has eruptible magma that just needs to be “tipped” into erupting.
What you’d need to potentially make it work — and why that likely wouldn’t work either.
Armed with this information, if you want to try to get a volcano to erupt, you’ll need to do a few things:
- Find a volcano that is already showing some signs of magma intruding at shallow depths. This might be high levels of volcanic gases, shallow earthquakes, deformation of the volcano. You want something “primed” to go.
- Figure out a way to release the lithostatic pressure keeping the “cork” on the volcano so that the bubbles can form.
- Figure out how to get a lot of water into the volcano quickly … but not too quickly.
How I’d try to do it.
Okay, so, how would I do it? First, I need to find a volcano ready to erupt that doesn’t erupt frequently (so that pressure is already building). Thinking of volcanoes globally that are showing signs of unrest today and likely a decent volume of eruptible magma, my pick might be Santorini in the Aegean Sea. The bonus there is that I have ready access to water. If there is magma rising under the volcano, then what I want to do is catastrophically release the overlying burden of rocks to produce bubbles in the magma, I want those bubbles to form a layer at top of the magma body to concentrate the pressure and I want to get water into that magma chamber to help aid explosivity. However, this is all easier said that done. One strategy would be to do something like mountain-top removal mining to remove a portion of the land surface above the magma body — however, this takes time. What evil genius holds the world ransom while they slowly remove truckloads/boatloads of material (“Sorry, hold on, only 10,000 more loads to go!”). No, to do it quickly you’d many want high explosive charges just below the surface to blast away the land surface. You’d need a lot of them placed as a grid across the volcano, but the goal is to remove material quickly. Now, those explosives should do double-duty, where the shaking caused by the explosions might shake bubbles free in the magma (as more bubbles are produced from the release of the pressure). If the pressure gets high enough, the weakened roof (from the explosives) above the magma body might give away, allowing for a rapid decompression. If you wanted to add to the fun, the cracks you’d developed should allow for percolation of seawater into the magma to help the explosion along (much like may have happened at Krakatau in 1883).
And now, the real problem
Now, you might be thinking “he’s got this whole thing figured out.” Thanks, I try. However, I don’t have it all figured out because there is one more problem I haven’t mentioned. That problem is time. Sure, I could do all these things but one thing that volcanologists don’t have a good grasp on is the timing — how long between the triggers of an eruption and the actual eruption. In some cases, it looks like seconds, like the earthquake and landslide at Mount St. Helens that triggered the 1980 eruption. In some cases, the trigger could take months or even a year as seems to be suggested by some volcanoes in Chile after large earthquakes. So, you might go through all the trouble only to have really no control on when the volcano will erupt — again, not the best plan if you’re planning to shock the world with evil genius. Heck, there is a pretty good chance that the volcano might not even erupt — so many variables go into this that even picking an ideal volcano that is ready to blow might not do it — and all your activity might impede an eruption rather than cause it. This all just shows how little we know about the exact mechanisms that can cause a specific volcano to erupt. So, as you draft your plans for world conquest, cross “hold the world hostage as I cause a volcano to erupt” from the list. You have a better chance at steering an asteroid into the planet than getting Yellowstone to explode at your whim. (What this person fails to recognize is that our scientists know a great deal about volcanos and earthquakes and tectonic plates. They have been studying every detail and mapping out the locations of every factor required to reach their goals. They know so much about lava both outside the volcano and deep inside the earth. They know EXACTLY what the best circumstances are to create the desired results and they know exactly how to trigger each step. Not only that, but they have the guidance of the fallen angels who currently have dominion over the earth.)
spacer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3SKNhmKvQQ
spacer
spacer’
Activity—World Map of Plate Boundaries
Oregon State University
https://ceetep.oregonstate.edu › sites › files › 7-…
Mapping the Earth’s Tectonic Plates
Maps Mania
https://googlemapsmania.blogspot.com › 2015/03 › m…
How did scientists map the tectonic plates around the world?
Quora
https://www.quora.com › How-did-scientists-map-the-tec…
spacer
US20100072297A1 – Method for controlling hurricanes
Controlling a Hurricane
In the mid-20th century, the United States government invested in two major projects designed to control hurricanes by seeding the storm clouds.
Humans haven’t quite figured out how to control the weather—but it’s not for lack of trying. In fact, between the 1940s and the early 1970s, the United States government developed Project Cirrus and Project STORMFURY, both attempts to manipulate hurricanes by seeding clouds.
Hurricanes generally start as low-pressure systems off the coast of Africa and move west towards the Americas. They can progressively strengthen as they suck up the energy of the warm waters they swirl over. The strongest hurricanes on record have had winds hitting 185 mph. And yet, as hurricane researchers H. E. Willoughby et al., write, “The goal of human control of hurricanes was captivating and seemed to be physically attainable in the beginning.”
As detailed by Willoughby et al., the U.S. government’s efforts to blunt the massive destructive power of hurricanes started with Project Cirrus. In 1947, scientists tried seeding a hurricane tracking off the coast of Florida and Georgia with silver iodide. The idea was that this would turn the supercooled water contained in the storm into ice. This ice would then fall as snow, and the resulting convection outside the hurricane’s center, or eye, would “compete” with the eye. This would theoretically force the eye to reform at a larger radius, slowing down the storm.
The intent was to dilute the storm’s strength. Instead, the storm actually reversed course and slammed into Georgia and South Carolina. While this course-shift wasn’t attributed to the seeding, it didn’t make for a public relations triumph. The charge that human intervention had turned the storm towards the coast left a lasting impression, making later hurricane modification efforts hard to rally support for. (one of the reasons for all the secrecy)
Nevertheless, after three big hurricanes in 1954 and three more again in 1955 (with a total of nearly 400 fatalities and many billions of dollars in damages), Congress mandated the establishment of the National Hurricane Research Project. In addition to studying the formation of hurricanes and improving forecasting, the NHRP was to seek methods of hurricane modification.
Hurricane Manipulation Experiment
Harvard University’s 4000 acre laboratory & classroom
Long Term Ecological Research site since 1988
Based on reconstructions and modeling of the history of tropical storms in our region and long-term studies of the impacts of the 1938 hurricane, we have developed a good understanding of many aspects of the role of hurricanes in structuring the forest vegetation in New England. Although only occurring every 50 to 200 years across the landscape, powerful hurricanes create extensive windthrow and forest damage that structures terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems for centuries thereafter. As a consequence, hurricanes are one of the most important natural disturbances affecting the eastern U.S.
Despite our extensive understanding of these storms there are many aspects of their impacts on forest ecosystems that are poorly understood. In particular we have little information on the response of individual tree species to the mechanical damage inflicted by high winds, or the rate and pattern of physiological, population and community response to the changed environment after a storm. Similarly, the rate and types of biogeochemical responses of forests to hurricane damage is very poorly understood.
In order to address these questions and to provide a contrast to other large experiments being conducted at the Harvard Forest, we developed a large hurricane simulation in 1990. By producing an experimental hurricane we were able to collect detailed baseline information on the forest before damage and then follow specific processes and characteristics afterwards. To simulate the hurricane we pulled trees over in a two-acre forested area using a large winch. Data from the 1938 hurricane were used to determine the trees selected for damage and the direction of fall. The resulting pattern provided a realistic simulation of wind damage.
Since 1990 the experimental area and adjoining control site have been studied in detail and have yielded many surprises. In particular the extent and species pattern of survival by uprooted trees was unexpected. In addition the forest ecosystem has proved to be extremely resilient to damage. Very few changes were witnessed in microenvironmental conditions or biogeochemistry despite the massive changes in forest structure.
The experimental hurricane will continue to be studied and compared to long-term data from forests damaged in 1938 and other natural disturbances.
This project is supported by the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research Program.
- Explore data and publications from this experiment and related hurricane research.
- Explore related research highlights and multimedia.
So, this study has been in action since 1988. YOU KNOW THEY ARE EXPERIMENTING with more technology and in a manner that provides real data from real events.
spacer
spacer
US20030085296A1 – Hurricane and tornado control device
Google Patents
US20100072296A1 – Method of Interrupting a Tornado
Google Patents
spacer
Tornado Power: Green Energy of the Future? | Smart News
Louis Michaud, the entrepreneur behind the tornado power, has spent years “trying to be taken seriously,” Gigaom writes. His technology, dubbed the Atmospheric Vortex Engine, introduces warm, humid air into a circular station where it assumes the form of a rising vortex. In other words, he creates a controlled tornado.Dec 17, 2012
spacer
Controlled Tornadoes Create Renewable Energy
Discover Magazine
Can We Really Make Tornadoes for Energy? This Man …
National Geographic
Will Man-Made Tornadoes Be The Future Of Renewable ...
Giant Freakin Robot
Microwave a Tornado, Lase a Rainstorm
Scientists are developing new technology to control old natural hazards.
er
166 subscribers
spacer
RED STATE TORNADOS ARE WEATHER WARFARE
December 16th, 2021.
#HAARP / #TORNADOS / #WEATHERWARFARE
1008 subscribers
spacer
Shooting clouds with lasers triggers electrical discharge
New Scientist
The man who wants to control the weather with lasers
CNN.com
Scientists guide lightning with lasers fired at thunderclouds
The Hill
spacer
Scientists used a laser beam to bend a bolt of lightning …
Business Insider
spacer
It’s Time to Engineer the Sky
Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops
On the crisp afternoon of February 12, 2023, two men parked a Winnebago by a field outside Reno, Nev. They lit a portable grill and barbecued a fist-sized mound of yellow powdered sulfur, creating a steady stream of colorless sulfur dioxide (SO2) gas. Rotten-egg fumes permeated the air as they used a shop vac to pump the gas into a balloon about the diameter of a beach umbrella. Then they added enough helium to the balloon to take it aloft, attached a camera and GPS sensor, and released it into the sky. They tracked the balloon for the next several hours as it rose into the stratosphere and drifted far to the southwest, crossing over the Sierra Nevada Mountains before popping and releasing its gaseous contents. The contraption plummeted into a cow pasture near Stockton, Calif.
The balloon released only a few grams of SO2, but the act was a brazen demonstration of something long considered taboo—injecting gases into the stratosphere to try to slow global warming. Once released, SO2 reacts with water vapor to form droplets that become suspended in the air—a type of aerosol—and act as tiny mirrors, reflecting incoming sunlight back to space. Luke Iseman and Andrew Song, founders of solar geoengineering company Make Sunsets, had sold “cooling credits” to companies and individuals; a $10 purchase would fund the release of a gram of SO2, which they said would offset the warming effects of a metric ton of atmospheric carbon dioxide for a year. They had planned a launch in Mexico but switched to the U.S. after the Mexican government forbade them.
Many people recoil at the notion of solar geoengineering, or solar radiation management (SRM), as it’s often called. The idea that humans should try to fix the atmosphere they’ve messed up by messing with it some more seems fraught with peril—an act of Faustian arrogance certain to backfire. But as it becomes clear that humans are unlikely to reduce emissions quickly enough to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius, some scientists say SRM might be less scary than allowing warming to continue unabated. Proposals for cooling the planet are becoming more concrete even as the debate over them grows increasingly rancorous.
SRM replicates a natural phenomenon created by large volcanic eruptions. When Mount Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it blasted 20 million tons of SO2 into the stratosphere, creating an “aerosol parasol” that cooled the planet by about 0.5 degree C over the next year or so before the droplets settled back to Earth. Studies suggest that if SRM were deployed at sufficient scale—maybe one quarter of a Pinatubo eruption every year, enough to block 1 or 2 percent of sunlight—it could slow warming and even cool the planet a bit. Its effects would be felt within months, and it would cost only a few billion dollars annually. In comparison, transitioning away from fossil fuels is expected to take decades, and the CO2 emitted until then could make warming worse. Using machines to remove billions of tons of CO2 from the skies, a process called direct-air capture, could slow warming but would be fighting itself—the machines might increase the world’s energy consumption by up to 25 percent, potentially creating more greenhouse gas emissions. Because SRM could produce effects quickly, it has political appeal. It’s “the only thing political leaders can do that would have a discernible influence on temperature within their term in office,” says Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist emeritus at the Carnegie Institution for Science, who is also a senior scientist at Breakthrough Energy, an organization founded by Bill Gates.
Caldeira and others say SRM should be pursued with extreme caution—if at all. It could noticeably whiten our blue sky. It could weaken the stratospheric ozone layer that protects us and Earth’s biosphere from ultraviolet radiation. It might change weather patterns and move the monsoons that water crops for billions of people. And it wouldn’t do anything to remedy other CO2-related problems such as ocean acidification, which is harming the ability of corals, shellfish and some plankton to form skeletons and shells.
Critics also say that the very idea of an escape hatch such as SRM could undermine support for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Like a prescription drug, if SRM were used responsibly—temporarily and in small doses—it could be beneficial, easing what is likely to be a dangerously hot century or two and buying humanity some extra time to transition to renewable energy. But it also has potential for abuse. At higher doses it could increasingly distort the climate, altering weather patterns in ways that pit nation against nation, possibly leading to war.
For all these reasons, more than 400 scientists have signed an open letter urging governments to adopt a worldwide ban on SRM experiments. But other scientists are proceeding, if reluctantly. “All the scientists I know who are working on this—none of them want to be working on it,” says Alan Robock, a climatologist at Rutgers University. Robock, who previously showed the world how a nuclear winter could shroud Earth, studies SRM out of a sense of obligation. “If somebody’s tempted to do this in the future,” he says, they “should know what the consequences would be.”
Two months after the Reno balloon release, on April 10, Iseman and Song visited the Berkeley Marina in California to launch three more stratospheric balloons, funded by $2,840 of cooling credits purchased by customers. “A 747 emits this amount in a couple of minutes,” Iseman said as he held high the first balloon in his right hand, with San Francisco Bay shimmering in the background and a camera crew filming. Then he let it go. A few days later the two men attended an Earth Day event in San Francisco, where they helped children launch their own small balloons, coated with chalk dust, which could aerosolize. “Our goal,” Iseman said, “is to make 1,000 new geoengineers.”
spacer