They are deadly serious about achieving their NWO by 2024. This year is going to be a majorly eventful year. The Pandemic Treaty plays a HUGE role in their plan. This is the culmination of all the preliminary work they have been laying over the past few decades. This is what the credit cards the UPC codes, the Electronic Health Records, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), the Digital ID, the social credit system and medical passports are all about. THIS is how they will enforce the NWO.
PAY ATTENTION! STAY AWAKE.
I personally do not believe we can do anything to stop it. The Bible says it will happen. So, all the praying in the world will not change it. What we can pray is what GOD told us to pray, That we will be found worthy to escape all that is coming.
Meanwhile, you can make your voice heard. You can let your congressmen know where you stand.
This Pandemic TREATY is TRYANNY!
spacer
The Pandemic Treaty Is a Spreading Plague- Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
(Fact Checked March 30, 2022)
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The globalist cabal wants to monopolize health systems worldwide, and a STEALTH ATTACK is already underway in the form of an international pandemic treaty, proposed by the World Health Organization.
The treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere. Not only would the treaty empower the WHO to mandate COVID jabs and vaccine passports globally, it could potentially also expand the WHO’s power to dictate all health care policy worldwide.
The treaty would also give the WHO the power to censor health information worldwide. This would be disastrous, as the WHO has a long history of corruption and health policy failures that are intrinsically linked to conflicts of interest.
When people are harmed by the WHO’s health policies, there’s no accountability because the WHO has diplomatic immunity.
Bill Gates, the second largest funder of the WHO, has also been funding pandemic exercises, including Event 201 and the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s exercise on international response to deliberate biological events. This scenario involved a deliberate release of a genetically engineered bioweapon — a pneumonic plague — for which there is no available treatment. Both exercises were held in 2019.
The globalist cabal wants to monopolize health systems worldwide, and a stealth attack is already underway in the form of an international pandemic treaty. The negotiations for this treaty began March 3, 2022.
As reported by The Pulse;
“Coming off the back of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization is proposing a new pandemic treaty they’re hoping will be accepted by enough member countries to become a reality by 2024.” According to Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, “me-first” approaches “stymie the global solidarity needed” to address global threats. His solution? Give the WHO all the power. “The pandemic treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.”
Over the past two years, in the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists have justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment. Now, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent, and to extend it into the health care systems of every nation.
Treaty Threatens National Sovereignty
As noted by The Pulse, “there are a number of things in the treaty that the people of the world need to consider before going down this path.” In the featured video, The Pulse’s Joe Martino interviews Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, a member of the steering committee of the World Council for Health, who points out that the treaty gives the WHO: “… an inordinate amount of power to make decisions in sovereign countries as to how people live and how they deal with pandemics, from lockdowns to mandates over treatment.”
In short, it would create a one-size-fits-all approach to disease, without regard for all the varying situations found in individual countries, and this is something we already know doesn’t work. The treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere. At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of dollars to participate in this process. As explained by Mohamed, the treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health Assembly in 2023. They need a majority for it to pass and, if passed, all member countries will be bound by it.
Click here to DOWNLOAD the rest of Dr. Mercola’s Analysis.
-Story credit goes to Dr. Joseph Mercola-
spacer
The new pandemic treaty is good for the world and the U.S. – STAT
Is it? Is it really?? – NOT!
This pandemic treaty, however, could help avoid such calamities. Provisions to facilitate data-sharing (In my opinion there has been entirely too much data-sharing in the world already! The computerized health records were supposed to protect our information. In reality, it made our personal information and health records available to everyone and anyone and expose us to negative social consequences.). between countries could help U.S. scientists and public health officials make quicker and more informed decisions (again, that is just the point. We don’t want anyone, especially scientists and public health officials making decisions for us.) to limit the spread of a disease, while clauses on ensuring an equitable global distribution of vaccines could prevent the rise of dangerous variants of a pathogen.
Beyond these benefits, this treaty could resolve many complaints that conservative critics have about the WHO (Sure you bet, they will make it illegal to disagree or to speak against any of their policies, thereby eliminating all those pesky right-wing dissenters) in the first place. For example, some have argued that a pandemic treaty would empower the organization that many see as being anti-American and influenced by foreign governments. (If this treaty was not meant to “empower the organization” why do you think they have spent so much time and money to get it passed? What are they trying to get out of it if not the power to enforce their policies? National Sovereignty is the MAIN obstacle they are looking to demolish. EVERY NATION that stands sovereign is the target of their campaign.)
If the WHO was biased against the U.S., a pandemic treaty would be a useful way to rectify the issue. It would give the U.S. a powerful seat at the table, allowing it to use its diplomatic and economic weight to support the promotion of American and allied civil servants at the WHO. These personnel often greatly influence international institutions — one study found that international personnel at the United Nations often exercise significant discretionary authority on everything from arms control negotiations to financing post-civil war reconstruction efforts. America’s influence on personnel appointments via the pandemic treaty could ensure that WHO officials remain friendly to American values and assuage concerns about anti-American bias.
IF WE JUST MAINTAIN OUR SOVEREIGNTY WE DO NOT COME UNDER THEIR AUTHORITY. So, what? Are they threatening that if we don’t join the treaty they could employ the force of their union in a manner that is not friendly to American values?
Many of the arguments proliferating against the pandemic treaty have little merit. A pandemic treaty would not turn over final decision-making power on public health or lockdowns to the WHO — such authority would remain in the hands of the American people and their representatives. Also, concerns about a treaty limiting America’s national sovereignty are misleading, as it is unlikely that restrictions on national sovereignty would find their way into a treaty given the number of countries expressing similar hesitations and desiring a more moderate approach. The entire idea is against National Sovereignty! Who are they kidding?? All nations have a right to be concerned and should NOT sign on to such a thing for any reason. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
spacer
24 world leaders issue bogus call for pandemic treaty excerpts only
Mar 30, 2021Thomas Scripps. 30 March 2021.In an act of breathtaking hypocrisy, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron have led a call by 24 world leaders for nations to “work together towards a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness”.
World Health Organisation (WHO) director-general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is also a signatory.
The letter begins by invoking the post-Second World War period: “At that time, following the devastation of two world wars, political leaders came together to forge the multilateral system. The aims were clear—to bring countries together, to dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation, namely peace, prosperity, health and security.” Yes, indeed and what a failure that has been. The League of Nations and it successor The United Nations has done nothing to achieve all those lofty goals (promises). We find ourselves once again on the brink of World destruction. Every where that the UN has gone their has been devastation, rape, murder, inequity and NO IMPROVEMENT to the lives of the masses as a direct result of UN intervention.
Warning, “There will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies”, the letter continues, “We are, therefore, committed to ensuring universal and equitable access to safe, efficacious and affordable vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for this and future pandemics.” That is a joke. Who believes that lie?
The letter concludes with the need for world governments to be “guided by solidarity, fairness, transparency, inclusiveness and equity.” According to who??
If this were not such a naked example of political showmanship, it would be necessary to ask on what planet these government leaders have been living this past year. The global response to the pandemic has been defined by the utterly destructive influence of geostrategic tensions and the selfish pursuit of national interests. All of which has found its most grotesque expression in the governments of Johnson, Merkel and Macron!
spacer
3 days ago
Circumventing America’s Constitution
A key question surrounding the accord is whether the Biden administration can bind America to treaties and agreements without the consent of the U.S. Senate, which is required under the Constitution. The zero draft concedes that, per international law, treaties between countries must be ratified by national legislatures, thus respecting the right of their citizens to consent. However, the draft also includes a clause that the accord will go into effect on a “provisional” basis, as soon as it is signed by delegates to the WHO, and therefore it will be legally binding on members without being ratified by legislatures.
“Whoever drafted this clause knew as much about U.S. constitutional law and international law as I did, and deliberately drafted it to circumvent the power of the Senate to give its advice and consent to treaties, to provisionally bring it into force immediately upon signature,” Boyle said. In addition, “the Biden administration will take the position that this is an international executive agreement that the president can conclude of his own accord without approval by Congress, and is binding on the United States of America, including all state and local democratically elected officials, governors, attorney generals and health officials.”
There are several U.S. Supreme Court decisions that may support the Biden administration in this. They include State of Missouri v. Holland, in which the Supreme Court ruled that treaties supersede state laws. Other decisions, such as United States v. Belmont, ruled that executive agreements without Senate consent can be legally binding, with the force of treaties.
There are parallels between the WHO pandemic accord and a recent OECD global tax agreement, which the Biden administration signed on to but which Republicans say has “no path forward” to legislative approval. In the OECD agreement, there are punitive terms built in that allow foreign countries to punish American companies if the deal is not ratified by the United States.
As with the OECD tax agreement, administration officials are attempting to appeal to international organizations to impose policies that have been rejected by America’s voters. Under the U.S. Constitution, health care does not fall under the authority of the federal government; it is the domain of the states. The Biden administration found this to be an unwelcome impediment to its attempts to impose vaccine and mask mandates on Americans, when courts ruled that federal agencies did not have the authority to do so.
“To circumvent that, they went to the WHO, for either the regulations or the treaty, to get around domestic opposition,” Boyle said.
According to the zero draft, signatories would agree to “strengthen the capacity and performance of national regulatory authorities and increase the harmonization of regulatory requirements at the international and regional level.” They will also implement a “whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach at the national level” that will include national governments, local governments, and private companies.
The zero draft stated that this new accord is necessary because of “the catastrophic failure of the international community in showing solidarity and equity in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.”
A report from the WHO’s Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (pdf) characterized the WHO’s performance as a “toxic cocktail” of bad decisions. Co-chair Ellen Johnson Sirleaf told the BBC it was due to “a myriad of failures, gaps and delays.” The solutions proposed by that report, however, did not suggest more local autonomy or diversified decision-making, but rather greater centralization, more power, and more money for the WHO.
‘One Health Surveillance’ and Misinformation
The WHO pandemic agreement calls for member states to implement “One Health surveillance.” One Health is a concept that has been embraced by the UN, the CDC, the World Bank, and other global organizations.
“The term originally meant a way of seeing human and animal health as linked—they sometimes are—so that you could improve human health by acting more broadly,” Bell said. “It has become hijacked and now is used to claim that all human activities, and all issues within the biosphere, affect health, and are therefore within Public Health’s remit. So public health can be deemed to include climate, or racism, or fisheries management, and this is being used to claim that addressing carbon emissions is a health issue and therefore a health ‘emergency.’”
The WHO zero draft states that “‘One Health surveillance’ means …,” leaving the definition to be worked out in future drafts. Whatever One Health surveillance ultimately entails, however, the signatories must invest in it, implement it, and “strengthen” it. In September 2022, the World Bank approved a Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) to finance, among other things, One Health surveillance.
Signatories also agree to support the official narrative when it comes to information about a pandemic. Specifically, they will “conduct regular social listening and analysis to identify the prevalence and profiles of misinformation” and “design communications and messaging strategies for the public to counteract misinformation, disinformation and false news, thereby strengthening public trust.” (We have already seen that ALL governments lie to the people. Propaganda is the word of the day. Anyone who speaks out against the “NARRATIVE” of the elite is considered fake news and disinformation even though they are speaking TRUTH.)
This aligns with efforts by the Biden administration to, as former White House Press Secretary Jennifer Psaki put it, “make sure social media companies are aware of the latest narratives dangerous to public health … and engage with them to better understand the enforcement of social media platform policies.” Or as UN Undersecretary-General Melissa Fleming stated at a 2022 World Economic Forum panel on “Tackling Disinformation” in Davos, “We own the science and we think that the world should know it.”
The official narrative during the COVID pandemic included support for lockdowns, school closures, and masking—all of which have since proven to be ineffective in stopping the spread of the virus and damaging to public health (not to mention destructive to the world’s economy!) . A group of more than 900,000 doctors, epidemiologists, and public health scientists jointly signed the Great Barrington Declaration in 2020, expressing “grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies.” This declaration was widely derided as dangerous misinformation and was censored on social media.
“The views that they crushed were orthodox public health,” Bell said. Up until 2019, public health guidelines “specifically said that things like prolonged border closures, closing stores, etc. were harmful, particularly for low-income people, and shouldn’t be done beyond a few weeks.”
Those who pushed for lockdowns “were very clear that what they were recommending for COVID was going to be extremely harmful, and that the harm would outweigh the benefit,” Bell said. “They were clear because they wrote that down before, and there’s nothing new in the idea that impoverishing people reduces life expectancy. Something dramatically changed their minds, and that something wasn’t evidence, so we can only assume that it was pressure from vested interests.” All those billionaire “stakeholders’ who attend meetings like DAVOS, WEF, Bilderberger, and CFR. Who don’t give a hoot about the general public.”
In January, a survey presented at the World Economic Forum found that public trust in government has plummeted since the start of the pandemic, though attendees were at a loss to explain the reasons for the decline in trust. Instead, the discussion at the panel, titled “Disrupting Distrust,” focused on combating rogue news sources that challenged the central narrative.
America’s Membership in the WHO
In July 2020, then-President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from membership in the WHO. Citing the WHO’s dismal performance in responding to the COVID pandemic and its ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Trump said that U.S. funding of approximately half a billion dollars per year would also cease.
Today, GOP lawmakers are attempting to revive the effort to take the United States out of the WHO. On Jan. 12, House Republicans introduced the “No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act,” which was sponsored by 16 representatives.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Tex.), lead sponsor of the bill, stated: “Funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to the corrupt World Health Organization that serves the Chinese Communist Party is a slap in the face to hardworking American families struggling under record high inflation, and to all those whose lives and livelihoods were ruined and destroyed by the COVID pandemic. The WHO … praised China for their ‘leadership’ at the beginning of COVID-19 and has done nothing to hold the CCP accountable for the spread of COVID-19.”
The pandemic accord, a spokesman for Roy told The Epoch Times, “is just another reason to defund the WHO.”
Redefining Sovereignty and Human Rights
The zero draft of the accord states that national sovereignty remains a priority, but within limits. “States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health,” the draft declares, “provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries.”
The accord states that human rights are also important, and it mandates that “people living under any restrictions on the freedom of movement, such as quarantines and isolations, have sufficient access to medication, health services and other necessities and rights.” The accord presents human rights as “health equity, through resolute action on social, environmental, cultural, political and economic determinants of health.”
In line with this concept, countries like Austria went so far as to criminalize the refusal to take the COVID vaccine. Within the United States, places like New York City mandated vaccine passports for access to public spaces, dividing its residents into a privileged vaccinated class and a second-tier unvaccinated class.
However, others see human rights not in terms of collective health but rather as individual rights, to include such things as personal sovereignty, the ability of individuals to make their own choices, the right of people to have a voice in medical decisions that affect them, free speech, and freedom of movement and assembly.
Following the Second World War and the state-control ideologies of fascism, national socialism, and communism, “it was realized that there has to be a fundamental understanding that individuals are sovereign” Bell said. Human rights declarations after the war emphasized that, even during times of crisis, “we are born with rights, we’re all equal, and those rights are inviolable. That is being very much watered down or wiped away in order to do this.”
“I think this issue is much, much broader; it’s what sort of society we want to live in. Do we believe in equality or do we believe in a feudal system where we have a few people at the top, controlling society, telling others what to do? That’s the direction we’re going in.”
The WHO, the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, and the World Bank were contacted regarding this article but did not provide a response.
Signing onto the pandemic treaty would be a valuable opportunity to bolster American influence in the developing world. For decades, the U.S. has systematically undervalued diplomatic and economic engagement with sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and other developing regions. The result has allowed other nations to make substantial inroads, whether that means China’s rapid investments in Latin America or Russia’s massive arms sales to nations in sub-Saharan Africa. As projections show that some of these countries are likely to have double-digit economic growth and exert serious clout in the future, the U.S. can no longer afford to ignore these countries if it is serious about upholding its global leadership.
Good-faith participation in the pandemic treaty represents a salient way to increase U.S. influence in these regions. Gross global inequities in the distribution of vaccines and therapeutics have left many low-income countries and their citizens distrustful towards Western institutions and more eager to look elsewhere, giving countries like China and Russia valuable opportunities to build support. But if the U.S. effectively used a pandemic accord to support the development of health care systems in low-income countries, the result could greatly improve regional public opinion about the U.S. and foster closer bilateral relations.
DO YOU really buy any of that crap?? Excuse my french. The US has collapsed largely in part because as a Nation we have been controlled and manipulated by European Elites, used as the Enforcer for their policies and allowing their policies to collapse our economy while using our money to build up China and other nations who have no respect for our Nation or interest in our well being. Our nation became great because we were a Christian Nation Blessed by GOD. We turned our back on him and allowed man’s wisdom to rule. We need to get back to the basics and quit aligning ourselves with the ungodly. The UN has been working hard to steal the wealth of the USA to build up the nations they choose.
Closer relations could help American investors and security planners build new partnerships in these regions, while improved public opinion of the U.S. could fuel the rise of pro-American leaders in the long term. (LOL, LOL, LOL) A pandemic treaty is key to reaping these benefits. The long-lasting, society-wide nature of the Covid-19 pandemic made health care a uniquely salient issue to many in low-income countries, so U.S. support on this vital issue would exceptionally benefit its diplomatic reputation worldwide.
U.S. support for the International Treaty for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response is good for both global health equity and promoting America’s values abroad. (The Pandemic Treaty has NO AMERICAN VALES CONNECTED WITH IT. IT IS TOTALLY UNAMERICAN AND ANTI FREEDOM. It is not good for any nation. It seeks to make slaves of all peoples.) Rather than reject a treaty under vague national sovereignty concerns and conspiratorial fears, American policymakers should embrace good-faith participation in this new pandemic treaty. The world — and the U.S. — will be healthier and wealthier for it. (Anyone who has paid attention to what is said and done at the WORLD ECONOMIC FOREM should have no doubt as to the goals and aspirations of the elite and their plans for the masses.)
Sergio Imparato is a lecturer on government at Harvard University and author of “The Sovereign President” (Pisa University Press, 2015). Sarosh Nagar is a researcher in the Department of Economics at Harvard University.r