Much like the USA is the strongest defense the world has against tyranny, Texas is the strongest defense that the USA has against it. That is why Texas is a TARGET.
All the snowflakes who believe that you can stop violence by taking away the guns from honest citizens better wake up really fast. The world is going to hell in a handbasket and you will come to a point when you will wish to GOD that you had a gun.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. If someone wants to kill you and they don’t have a gun, they will use something else. The thing you need to fear the most is a government that wants to disarm the people. The fact that Americans have always had the right to bear arms has been the major contributor to our maintaining our freedoms. When there is a possibility of being met with force, those with evil intent are much more cautious.
Texas is the strongest example of the true American Dream. A place where people are free and supported in their efforts to maintain their self sufficiency. Standing for yourself, your family, your faith and your country, is what gives you self respect.
Snowflakes want the government to take care of them. Solve their problems, feed their children, and keep a roof over their heads. That is dependence on government. When the government is your caretaker, the government is your RULER. Let me tell you something, you cannot legislate morality. Good behavior comes from a good conscience. A good conscience only comes from GOD. God is the only one who can change a person’s heart.
The Feds want to beat Texas into submission, because Texas stands for what is right and true. If Texas falls…so falls the nation. IF the USA falls, so falls the WORLD!
I strongly believe that this SERIES OF WINTER STORMS is part of their plan to break the back of the American People. Texas seems to be the hardest hit… no surprise…
By the way… if you do not believe that the governments of the world are controlling the weather… I feel sorry for you. You are way behind…better start researching for yourself. There are plenty of articles on that topic here on this webpage. MANY, MANY MORE on the web. Better find them before they have all been CENSORED! It is no fantasy, the governments and corporations of the world state it in their own documentation, patents, advertisements and news releases. OPEN YOUR EYES! USE YOUR BRAIN! THE EVIDENCE IS ALL AROUND US.
Why Isn’t Anyone Calling Them Out On This Stuff???
Are we just going to swallow their BS hook line and sinker? This is not Climate Change caused by eating meat and cows farting! This is the MANIAC ELITE controlling the weather. This is a WEATHER WAR and we are the causalities! With everything that we know about their ability to manipulate weather, we know … Read More
I’m beginning to feel like a broken record. I’ve had to say this after the mass shootings in Santa Fe, Sutherland Springs, El Paso, and now Odessa. We appreciate your sympathy, but if you aren’t from Texas or don’t live in Texas, then shut up about gun issues in Texas.
Every time Texans face a tragedy or catastrophic event, non-Texans seek to insinuate themselves into our lives. It’s as though you feel entitled to dictate how we govern ourselves and how we live our lives. I get why you feel your opinion is somehow equal or superior to ours. You’ve been conditioned to think that way by our continued voluntary participation in your federal system. Allow me to disabuse you of that wrong-headed notion now.
We do not want your policy demands nor are they welcome. The reasons are simple. They are ridiculous, hypocritical, and show that you have no idea who Texans really are.
If your policy demands, that would restrict lawful ownership and carrying of guns, were worth a damn then Chicago and other major metropolitan areas outside of Texas would be gun-free islands of peace and stability. They aren’t. Instead, they are slaughterhouses for the poor who have been deprived of the basic right to defend themselves using the same tools as the aggressors.
This fact alone shouts to the world your hypocrisy and your latent racism. Since the beginning of 2019, 319 people have been killed by a firearm in Chicago with another 1,568 shot and wounded. However, there have been no collective cries of outrage from the Hollywood elite and their sycophantic followers. There have been no protests from politicians and full-time activists demanding action on the part of the City of Chicago or the State of Illinois. It is proof that your outrage is manufactured and your compassion is phony.
It also points out your ideological inconsistency. You demand that we stand at our border with Mexico with arms wide open proclaiming “O come all ye faithful” and your signs that declare “no one is illegal” while you completely and utterly disregard the criminal cartels who operate on the other side of the border with impunity. Those criminal gangs have no shortage of firepower that would be illegal for the average Texan to own or possess.
If you have your way, the borders would be wide open and Texans would be absolutely defenseless from the cartels. Every Texan would then by vulnerable to the criminals who would purchase weapons from them on a black market that would inevitably explode. I’m fairly certain the cartels aren’t running background checks. In short, they want to turn every town in Texas into Chicago, Detroit, and Washington, D.C.
At a fundamental level, you also do not understand Texans. If you did, you’d understand that the centerpiece of our founding is an attempt by an out-of-control government to forcibly remove a means of self-defense from Texans. It was not a rifle nor was it a pistol. It was a cannon. That attempt was rebuffed and this seemingly small event lit the spark that led to fires of independence spreading across Texas where that fire burns to this day.
I understand that you do not face similar issues in your ivory towers. You are hundreds or thousands of miles removed from the challenge and, therefore, cannot even begin to comprehend it. Because of that, your opinion is as worthless as tears in the rain.
We cherish our right to keep and bear arms in defense of ourselves, our families, our neighbors, our community, and our Texas. We will not accept the politicization of our pain. We will not accept any policy that would reduces us to the status of defenseless prey. We will not listen to the ceaseless judgment from self-righteous and disconnected narcissists who love nothing more than to see Texans suffer. Be gone. You have no power here.
spacer
What’s Good for the Goose: Texas Declares Itself a 2nd …
Texas 2nd Amendment Preservation Act Nullifies All Federal …
spacer
Why the Feds Fear Texas: Texans don’t back down from a fight.
Texans value their freedom and independence very highly. There is no shortage of people in Texas willing to fight to keep their rights. spacer
TEXAS SECEDE!
Doesn’t the Texas Constitution reserve the right of Texas to secede? |
This heavily popularized bit of Texas folklore finds no corroboration where it counts: No such provision is found in the current Texas Constitution[1] (adopted in 1876) or the terms of annexation.[2] However, it does state (in Article 1, Section 1) that “Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United States…” (note that it does not state “…subject to the President of the United States…” or “…subject to the Congress of the United States…” or “…subject to the collective will of one or more of the other States…“)
Neither the Texas Constitution, nor the Constitution of the United States, explicitly or implicitly disallows the secession of Texas (or any other “free and independent State”) from the United States. Joining the “Union” was ever and always voluntary, rendering voluntary withdrawal an equally lawful and viable option (regardless of what any self-appointed academic, media, or government “experts”—including Abraham Lincoln himself—may have ever said). Both the original (1836) and the current (1876) Texas Constitutions also state that “All political power is inherent in the people … they have at all times the inalienable right to alter their government in such manner as they might think proper.” Likewise, each of the united States is “united” with the others explicitly on the principle that “governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed“ and “whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends [i.e., protecting life, liberty, and property], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government“ and “when a long train of abuses and usurpations…evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” [3] |
Didn’t the outcome of the “Civil War” prove that secession is not an option for any State? [BACK TO TOP] |
No. It only proved that, when allowed to act outside his lawfully limited authority, a U.S. president is capable of unleashing horrendous violence against the lives, liberty, and property of those whom he pretends to serve. The Confederate States (including Texas) withdrew from the Union lawfully, civilly, and peacefully, after enduring several years of excessive and inequitable federal tariffs (taxes) heavily prejudiced against Southern commerce.[4] Refusing to recognize the Confederate secession, Lincoln called it a “rebellion” and a “threat” to “the government” (without ever explaining exactly how “the government” was “threatened” by a lawful, civil, and peaceful secession) and acted outside the lawfully defined scope of either the office of president or the U.S. government in general, to coerce the South back into subjugation to Northern control.[5]
The South’s rejoining the Union at the point of a bayonet in the late 1860s didn’t prove secession is “not an option” or unlawful. It only affirmed that violent coercion can be used—even by governments (if unrestrained)—to rob men of their very lives, liberty, and property.[6 It bears repeating that the united States are “united” explicitly on the principle that “governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed” and “whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends [i.e., protecting life, liberty, and property], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government“ and “when a long train of abuses and usurpations…evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” [7] |
Didn’t the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Texas v. White prove that secession is unconstitutional? [BACK TO TOP] |
No. For space considerations, here are the relevant portions of the Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. White:
It is noteworthy that documented support for the alleged “perpetual and indissoluble relation” or any requirement of “the consent of the States” for revocation (secession) weren’t produced by the court at that time, nor have they since been produced. It is also noteworthy that two years after that decision, President Grant signed an act entitling Texas to U.S. Congressional representation, readmitting Texas to the Union. What’s wrong with this picture? Either the Supreme Court was wrong in claiming Texas never actually left the Union (they were — see below), or the Executive (President Grant) was wrong in “readmitting” a state that, according to the Supreme Court, had never left. Both can’t be logically or legally true. To be clear: Within a two year period, two branches of the same government took action with regard to Texas on the basis of two mutually exclusive positions — one, a judicially contrived “interpretation” of the US Constitution, argued essentially from silence, and the other a practical attempt to remedy the historical fact that Texas had indeed left the Union, the very evidence for which was that Texas had recently met the demands imposed by the same federal government as prerequisite conditions for readmission. If the Supreme Court was right, then the very notion of prerequisites for readmission would have been moot — a state cannot logically be readmitted if it never left in the first place. This gross logical and legal inconsistency remains unanswered and unresolved to this day. Now to the Supreme Court decision in itself… The Court, led by Chief Justice Salmon Chase (a Lincoln cabinet member and leading Union figure during the war against the South) pretended to be analyzing the case through the lens of the Constitution, yet not a single element of their logic or line of reasoning referenced the actual text of the Constitution at all(!) — precisely because the Constitution is wholly silent on whether the voluntary association of a plurality of states into a union may be altered by the similarly voluntary withdrawal of one or more states. It’s no secret that more than once there had been previous rumblings about secession among many U.S. states (and not just in the South), long before the South seceded. These rumblings met with no preemptive quashing of the notion from a “constitutional” argument, precisely because there was (and is) no constitutional basis for either allowing or prohibiting secession. An objective reading of the relevant portions of the White decision reveals that it is largely arbitrary, contrived, and crafted to suit the agenda which it served: presumably (but unconstitutionally) to award to the U.S. federal government, under color of law, sovereignty over the states, essentially nullifying their right to self-determination and self-rule, as recognized in the Declaration of Independence, as well as the current Texas Constitution (which today stands unchallenged by the federal government). Where the Constitution does speak to the issue of powers, they resolve in favor of the states unless expressly granted to the federal government or denied to the states. No power to prevent or reverse secession is granted to the federal government, and the power to secede is not specifically denied to the states; therefore that power is retained by the states, as guaranteed by the 10th Amendment. The Texas v. White case is often trotted out to silence secessionist sentiment, but on close and contextual examination, it actually exposes the unconstitutional, despotic, and tyrannical agenda that presumes to award the federal government, under color of law, sovereignty over the people and the states. |
spacer
Herman: Texas secession, and chatter about war with the United States
Ken Herman
Austin American-Statesman
Used to be we knew — and generally knew to dismiss— fringe, nonsensical, bellicose chatter when we heard it.
Then we had Jan. 6, the date when years of such rhetoric roiled into action via an attack on the U.S. Capitol, an attack we never thought could happen until it did.
So now we listen to such talk with an ear that says maybe we should think about the unthinkable. I had that notion during the Thursday night Zoom session in which state Rep. Kyle Biedermann, R-Fredericksburg, announced that on Tuesday he will file legislation calling for a statewide vote on Texas secession from the United States.
The four men on the “virtual town hall” talked of a peaceful movement. The chatter in the chat sometimes went in a different direction, though to be fair, the more militant talk was framed in response to perceived military action that could be taken by the U.S. to forcibly prevent Texas secession.
The movement calls itself Texit, like Brexit, the successful effort that led the United Kingdom out of the European Union. Texit, like Brexit, is a peaceful political movement, its leaders said on the call. But on the margins, in the chat, some of the talk was about a call to arms should the U.S. seek to stop secession:
“As a disabled veteran, if there was a snowball’s chance in hell of combat, Texas veterans WILL decide individually, but I guarantee there are millions that are willing to literally fight back. YES, I will go.”
“Do not worry about invasion, we have 10 million Texans who own guns.”
And this: “How is Texit even possible when all of TX major cities are heavily blue and entirely controlled by zionist-globalist usury gangsters.”
Some in the chat sought to tamp down talk of war: “You’re bringing harmful nonsense to this. This is a peaceful issue. Stop saying there’ll be war.”
The secession session began with David Thomas Roberts who self-bills on Twitter as a “renegade capitalist” and “unapologetic Texan,” offering this: “This will be maybe a sort of a bummer for you to hear this, but the republic as we know it is dead.”
“We all hoped that Trump would pull a rabbit out of his hat,” Roberts said. “We know the election was stolen.”
“We’re not advocating violence,” Roberts said. “We’re not advocating any such thing.”
The baseline grievance was voiced by Texas Nationalist Movement leader Daniel Miller, who’s been advocating secession for about 25 years but is convinced, with Biedermann’s backing, this is the year: “We want to re-assert our status as a self-governing, independent nation, free of 180,000 pages of federal laws, rules and regulations administered by two and a half million unelected bureaucrats.”
Tuesday, Biedermann said of his scheduled bill filing, will be “when the fireworks really begin.”
“It will be a referendum for a vote for the people of Texas to basically force the Texas Legislature to put a plan together for us to become an independent nation and put us on the road for that,” he said.
Don’t underestimate the opposition, he cautioned.
“There’s going to be so much money poured into Texas to try to kill this bill because they don’t want you people of Texas to have the greatest nation in the world. They want you to be in the United States, one state controlled by California, New York, all the liberals in Washington D.C. And then just steal your money, steal your oil,” Biedermann said.
Biedermann: “Well, there is nobody that’s more patriotic, that loves this country, loves America, loves our flag, loves our Constitution than us. But we don’t love our federal government. And we don’t love our Constitution being trampled or a flag being burned or desecrated or kneeling for our national anthem.”
Secession, he said, will go viral.
“Other states are going to want to be joining with Texas,” he said on the call. “I mean it’s going to be a huge movement.”
Roberts pointed to what he sees as a recent election abomination that exemplifies why Texit is so needed.
“We sat here a couple of weeks ago with the fate of Texas … contingent upon two Senate races in Georgia on voting systems that we know are corrupt,” he said. “We’re Texans and we’re going to let our fate be decided by two Senate races in Atlanta? You got to be kidding me.”
Just like the nonsense about the presidential election, similar claims about the victories by now-Sens. Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, both D-Georgia, were baseless.
“What happened to Trump is a travesty,” Roberts said. “But it’s a blessing in disguise, folks, because if this is what finally gets us to a point where Texas is again lifting its head above, with the other nations, then so be it.”
Roberts suggested tactics to support Biedermann’s to-be-filed bill.
Randy Council, another speaker on the virtual town hall, advised listeners that emails and texts to lawmakers are fine, “but there’s nothing like walking into their office unannounced.”
The anti-secession forces don’t stand a chance if the Texit forces can raise enough money and gather enough support, Council said.
“If they know that Kyle’s got 10 million people out of 28 million for this bill. OK. If he’s got 14 million people for this bill, I promise you, (Gov. Greg) Abbott is going to pay attention,” he said.
In his wrap-up, Miller said the Texas Nationalist Movement website answers many of the questions about the effort.
“Some of them I could on this webinar give you some really pat answers, like how will we defend ourselves. And I could say something like, well, we do own eight guns for every man, woman and child on the soil of Texas,” he said. “But that’s a pithy answer, and the real detailed answers are on the website.”
Biedermann wrapped up by saying he feels chosen for this particular mission.
“God bless everybody. God bless Texas. This is what it’s all about. And I’m just so grateful to be just being used by God in this respect. This wasn’t planned by me. This is all a movement that is necessary,” he said.
“I just love Texas. And I love our Constitution. I love our flag. I love America, the spirit. America is not the country, America is not the government. America is the embodiment of the people of this country. And that’s not who we’re against. We’re against a tyrannical government.”
spacer
Is it true that Texans really consider themselves a separate country (at least subconsciously)?
One of my classmates told me that Texas is like it’s own country, with an elaborate constitution and some serious attitude toward the rest of the US. Is this accurate? I’m looking for some opinions here, not just a yes or no 🙂
4 Answers
Relevance
Lv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
Well, as a native Texan…here is the deal.
Texas is more than a place to live…it is a state of mind.
We started as a territory of Mexico…then in 1836- after the Texas Revolution, we became our own country. The Republic of Texas. In 1845, we had lots of problems and were annexed by the US. So, yes we WERE our own country, but not now. The urban legend is our constitution is special…and sure their are some things in their that are different from other states, but it is probably b/c we were our own republic…not a territory.
There is a movement in Texas that does want to secede from the US and have us become our own country…and we probably could b/c we have our own resources and power grid, etc…but it won’t ever happen. After the Civil War, the constitution changed a bit …before we could secede, but I don’t think we can anymore.
I know most people hate Texas…we are obnoxious…but when you take out politics and religion, it is a great state, and we all agree on one thing here- that we are better. Seriously, we do think that…no offense to other states.
The attitude is that we are better, bigger, badder…but it is just that…an attitude. (we do have our own TX shaped waffle makers) Most of us do say Texas over the US, but it doesn’t mean we don’t love being Americans…we do…it is just a cultural thing.
PS- I travel all the time, statewide, US, the world…and I always say I am from Texas…why? B/c the stereotypes about Texans are funny to hear.
Hope this helps!
haha- Mr – “Don’t Mess W/ Texas” is just a litter campaign…or is it?
edit- fiance wanted input
…Show more Anonymous1 decade agoSpeaking as a Texan, the answer is yes. We like to think of our state as a republic, rather than a state. Perhaps the attitude comes from the fact that we still hunt, execute felons, and eat anything with more than two legs. It is my desire to one day, secede, alas it will never be.
Lv 71 decade ago“Never ask a an if he is from Texas. If he is, he’ll tell you; If he isn’t, why embarrass him.”
I am, and the tall Texan girl is correct. They have signs on their highways about every three or four miles that say “Don’t mess with Texas”, and most people heed those signs.
spacer
>
15 Reasons Why Texans Are Proud – And Rightfully So
Texas pride is no well-kept secret; we display it for the world to see, because we just love our home to the ends of the Earth! Don’t mess with Texas, because we have quite a few reasons to be proud, and this list is just the tip of the iceberg. Here are 15 reasons why we are proud to live in Texas:
We’re aware that these uncertain times are limiting many aspects of life. While we continue to feature destinations that make our state wonderful, please take proper precautions or add them to your bucket list to see at a later date. If you know of a local business that could use some extra support during these times, please nominate them here: onlyinyourstate.com/nominateWhy else should Texans be proud of their state? Give us examples of Texas pride in the comments!
Address: Texas, USA
TEXAS PRIDE
What is Texas known for?
The list is too long to count! Texas has a lot going for it. Not only is the Lone Star State the second largest state in the country (behind Alaska), Texas is also home to a few of the most populous cities in the United States, including Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio. Of course, you can’t mention Texas without thinking about Texas BBQ, as they’ve got some of the best in the world, not to mention some of the best chili in the country, too. Nature lovers will be delighted to learn that bluebonnets, Texas’ state flower, bloom in the spring, peppering the state with countless beautiful blooms every year.
spacer
SO, There you have it. The elite/globalists/nazis/facists/feds want to take Texas because it will crush the will of the American people and because it will greatly enrich their holdings and empower them to maintain control over the world.
THE USA IS THE STRONGHOLD OF FREEDOM…
TEXAS IS THE STRONGHOLD OF INDEPENDENCE!!
WE CANNOT LET EITHER ONE FALL!!!
spacer