HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN!
WOW… what a nightmare we are living! Obama promised change, and BOY DID HE DELIVER. I don’t even recognize our country anymore. He was put in office by the elite to deliver America to the UN. He continues his unfinished work and he is having great success.
I find it so unbelievable to watch the people of this country buy into the ridiculous garbage put out by the politicians and the main stream media. The people are too blind to see that ALL of our systems have become so corrupt that our country may not even be salvageable. We have fallen to the level of a third world country, by design. If you don’t believe that Obama has been the driver behind this political coup, I pray you do a little more research. Pray for some discernment.
PEOPLE WAKE UP! They are using a very common ploy of ALL ABUSERS… They pass the blame. These treasonous politicians are transferring their actions and abuses onto our President. They are the ones who are committing all the crimes they are accusing him of committing, including inciting violence. They have been inciting violence for the past four years! They have been doing so much more to undermine our government and destroy our constitution. They have been selling us out to our enemies and destroying our nations ability to defend itself.
YOU BETTER WAKE UP FOLKS. It is coming to violence and civil war, because that is what they want. This is the pattern they have used in every third world country in order to accomplish their seizing of the governments. Are you going to let that happen here? Seriously, are the US citizens so brain dead, so doped up, so self serving that they cannot see what is happening??
Will this nation fall… It most likely will. The AntiChrist One World Government is foretold in the Bible. I guess this is the manifestation of that very thing coming to pass, right before our eyes.
Where do you stand? Jesus is coming soon, when he arrives… will you be among those who belong to HIM or will you be lost?
Obama Scores Dictator Trifecta
Should Americans be concerned that three of the world’s top dictatorships—also renowned for violating human rights—are endorsing President Obama?
Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who this week assured he’d vote for Obama if he were from the United States. The America-bashing strongman made the announcement on state-owned television, saying “Obama is a good guy” and that if Obama was from Caracas, he’d surely return the favor by voting for Chavez.
The Venezuelan dictator, who has forged a strong alliance with Iran, appreciates that Obama doesn’t consider Venezuela a threat to the interests of the Unites States. This despite illegally shipping U.S. military aircraft to help Iran evade American radar, hosting terrorists from Hezbollah and Colombia’s Revolutionary Armed Forces and helping Iran and Syria evade international sanctions. Chavez is also buying tons of advanced weaponry from Russia and has pulled out of human rights conventions that could call his regime on its many violations.
Oh, and who could forget that Chavez named a former military intelligence officer sanctioned by the U.S. for trafficking drugs as deputy interior minister. In 2008, the U.S. Treasury froze the new minister’s (Hugo Carvajal) assets because he assisted narcotics trafficking by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Chavez named another U.S.-blacklisted official who provided Colombian rebels with weapons and training commander General of the Army.
Earlier in the year the government-official daughter of Cuban military dictator Raul Castro proclaimed her country’s support for Obama during a visit to the U.S. “I believe that Obama needs another opportunity and he needs greater support to move forward with his projects and with his ideas, which I believe come from the bottom of his heart,” Mariela Castro said during a cable news interview. Cuba has for years appeared on the State Department’s list of terrorist sponsoring nations and its communist regime is famous for its atrocious human rights violations. Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro also endorsed Obama (actually an Obama-Clinton ticket) during the 2008 election in a piece published in the island’s communist paper.
That brings us to Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who has eliminated most elections in his country, monopolized all major media and destroyed the political party system. There is no doubt that he’s a dictator, according to a Russian journalist, who says the only reason this is questioned is because western leaders and western media refuse to call him one. Putin has also had his police cronies in Moscow arrest peaceful, legal demonstrators and confiscate, destroy or damage private property.
During the 2021 US Election Fraud we have seen the collaboration of some of Obama’s friends from that 2012 article. Along with some others who have the same agenda like Germany. Germany, where Obama is well connected.
This coup has been building for years. The corruption of our system has had enough time to become overwhelming. The people of this country have turned blind eyes to the signs because it was easier to just hope things get better. However, now things are out of control and it will be so much harder for true patriots to overcome.
IT ISN’T IMPEACHMENT, IT’S A COUP D’ETAT…
OCTOBER 2, 2019 | FROM FOX NEWS
I want to talk about the importance of words and the context they create. And I want to urge everybody who’s fair to never use the word “impeachment” for the current political process, because it has nothing to do with an impeachment.
This is a legislative coup d’etat. It is an effort by the hard left, the news media, and the deep state to destroy the president chosen by the American people. This is a project they’ve been involved in since election night 2016.
PRAY ABOUT THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS–FOR TRUTH AND FAIRNESS.
CLICK BELOW TO DOWNLOAD OUR SPECIAL REPORT.So far, we have had two years of a totally false Russian narrative, which even the editor of The New York Times had to admit failed with the Mueller report because it revealed there was no collusion. In those two years, we had FBI agents who were leaking. We had all sorts of effort by people in the deep state to destroy the president. We had The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the networks doing everything they could to destroy Trump and they failed.
Now they’ve come back with a new effort based on a new supposed scandal — which will turn out to be as phony as the Russian project was. But this fits the whole attitude of the left because they wake up every morning just certain Trump has done something terrible. They think he must be replaced. We can’t wait till the next election, so they just try anything to get rid of him. This is, in constitutional terms, a coup d’etat. It is an effort by one branch of the government to destroy the incumbent president of the United States without any regard for the facts.
Let’s look at the current example. One of the questions that must be answered is: When did the intelligence community change the rules for whistleblowers? Up until recently, in order to be a whistleblower, you had to have personal, firsthand knowledge of what you were blowing the whistle about. For some reason, this was changed. Now, was it changed to make it easier to smear Trump? Probably. But the truth is that we don’t know who changed it. We don’t know why it was changed, but what it produced was somebody who was not in the room, did not hear the phone call, had no personal knowledge, pulling together innuendo, gossip and rumor into a multi-page complaint — much of which is just plain, factually false.
But the minute there was a supposed whistleblower report, the Times, Post, network news channels and Democrats in the House were all horrified to such a degree that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced they were pursuing impeachment. Keep in mind, she did this before she met the whistleblower and before anybody had read the transcript of the phone conversation between the president of Ukraine and the president of the United States.
It turns out when you read the transcript, you have to ask yourself — at least I do as a historian — what’s the big deal? We have all sorts of records of Franklin Delano Roosevelt talking with Winston Churchill. We have records of John F. Kennedy talking with heads of state. We have records of Ronald Reagan talking with Gorbachev. Presidents do this and there’s no quid pro quo. In fact, the brand new, reform-oriented, anticorruption former comedian-turned president of Ukraine was in a happy, positive conversational mood and was telling Trump that he actually modeled himself on Trump to help break up the old order.
It’s a fascinating moment, but what comes out of it? You get the hysteria at the Times, Post, and “Meet the Press.” You get the constant chanting of impeach, impeach, impeach — and yet, that’s not what was happening. The fact is, it isn’t Trump who brought up Biden to attempt to blackmail the Ukrainians. It was Joe Biden, who in his own speech to the Council on Foreign Relations says he threatened to take $1 billion in loan guarantees unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating his son’s company.
Now, maybe Biden was not aware that his son was getting $600,000 a year from a company in Ukraine. That strikes me as pretty implausible. I think if one of my daughters had a $600,000 a year job, I’d know it. But you know we’ve seen Joe have some problems remembering things, so maybe he just forgot that Hunter was involved.
But it’s all weird. And it’s not Donald Trump, and it’s not Donald Trump’s tweets. It is a video in which Biden himself says that he threatened them, told them they had six hours to cave and fire the prosecutor. And as he put it, “Son of a b—-, he got fired.” So, it’s legitimate to ask, what was that all about?
And by the way, the prosecutor has said very clearly that he was investigating the company that Hunter Biden was involved in, and he was blocked because of that decision. So, then you get into a fight over whether this guy was corrupt or not corrupt? Part of the answer there is to investigate. Can you imagine the Democrats in the House having a hearing in which the Ukrainian prosecutor lays out the case against Hunter Biden? By any reasonable, normal standards, this is madness.
And it doesn’t stop there. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the chairman of the Intelligence Committee — which is normally considered a serious committee charged with monitoring the intelligence community of the United States as a global power — opened a supposedly serious hearing by reading two paragraphs from Trump that Trump never said. They just straight-out lie. In fact, Schiff himself admitted he wrote them as an “interpretation” of how Trump thinks.
Now, I’m only citing all this because no person who has any serious concern about the Constitution should use the word “impeachment” to describe what is closer to a Salem witchcraft trial than an orderly process of seeking justice.
An investigation would be fine. The investigation should include looking into when and who changed the rules for whistleblowing — and who were the sources for the whistleblower? How many of them are in fact liberal Democrats buried deep in the federal bureaucracy who hate Trump? Who leaked it to the news media? This whole thing is a political mugging and should not be honored with the term “impeachment.” I hope that people would just recognize this as a coup d’etat.
It is a deliberate effort by the left, both in the news media and in the Congress, to destroy the sitting president of the United States. It should be dealt with as such and we should be prepared to demand that they have to be open and engaged.
No one should be confused by the current phony, one-sided partisan effort. It’s not in any way an impeachment process. It is a denial of the American Constitution, a repudiation of the American people’s choice of president, and an effort to impose on the country what the left wants — whether the rest of us want it or not.
(From Fox News. Article by Newt Gingrich.)
POLITICS
Obama’s Coup is Complete
It took him longer than he planned on to get rid of Trump. In the end though, he got a trifecta with control of the presidency, the House and the Senate.
Poor Obama.
It took him longer than he planned on to get rid of Trump. In the end though, he got a trifecta with control of the presidency, the House and the Senate.
Obama is more in control of our country now than he ever was as president.
Events over the past year that were either planned or taken advantage of by the democrat party have led to a stolen election and a future of complete leftist control over our country. This is on top of the previous three years of resistance, mayhem and criminality that they participated in since Trump was inaugurated.
Democratic lies and corruption, a partisan and perverse education system, a dishonest and complicit media and worthless Republicans have propelled which can only be explained as a mob organization to power.
spacer
spacer
Barack Obama and the first two Rules For Radicals
Barack Obama never met Saul Alinsky, but the radical organizer’s thought helps explain a great deal about how the president operates.Alinsky died in 1972, when Obama was 11 years old. But three of Obama’s mentors from his Chicago days studied at a school Alinsky founded, and they taught their students the philosophy and methods of one of the first “community organizers.” Ryan Lizza wrote a 6,500-word piece on Alinsky’s influence on Obama for The New Republic, noting, “On his campaign website, one can find a photo of Obama in a classroom teaching students Alinskian methods. He stands in front of a blackboard on which he has written ‘Relationships Built on Self Interest,an idea illustrated by a diagram of the flow of money from corporations to the mayor.
spacer
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Saturday, January 9, 2021 22:29
ROBERT DAVID STEELE: I predict Hillary Clinton will be arrested publicly soon. Not sure about Obama. My best guess is Clinton and Bannon between 19 January, Obama, Cheney, others afterward.
spacer
The left doesn’t want to admit it, however, the more time goes by, the more we need to realize that Barack Obama was an evil president. I say this because it is clear Mr. Obama attempted to destroy the one thing that separates America from most of the world and provides for its overwhelming success — the rule of law.
Mr. Obama used the federal government as a gangster army to attack people he didn’t like, or that stood in his way for the left’s thirst for overwhelming power. He used the agencies of the federal government to spy on its citizens, oppress and intimidate the political opposition, and even manipulate our elections. This will have devastating consequences for generations of Americans to come, for its foundation has been shaken.
In addition, he purposefully weakened our national security, promoted an Islamist political ideology domestically and around the world, and attempted to radically change our demographics by importing millions upon millions of third world citizens that have no intention of believing in the principles America was founded upon.
He hurt us, and we may not recover.
Over the next few months, the truth about Barack Obama and his corrupt administration will be revealed. We will be shocked at how deep the rabbit hole of deceit and criminal behavior actually goes. The media will attempt to spin it of course, but the American people will see through their lies.
The Democratic Party will not recover for a long time.The Democrats know this, and this is why they are throwing everything they have at Attorney General William Barr, to bring him down before he finds out what really happened and exposes it for the world to see.
Yes, Barack Obama was an evil president.
spacer
The Obama Administration’s economic vision for America is coming into focus and it’s not pretty — the United States as a third-world nation.
Third world economies export raw materials, such as oil, timber and ore, while advanced economies process raw materials into value-added manufactured goods.
The U.S. has a newfound abundance of natural gas from the fracking boom. While the debate over fracking continues, the question remains: Should we use the gas for value-added manufacturing here in the U.S. (both as an inexpensive energy source and as a feedstock for chemicals and pharmaceuticals), or do we export it in raw form as liquefied natural gas?
The development strategy the president seems to favor resembles that of an extractive third world economy. The Financial Times reports:
The Obama Administration (along with corporatist allies in the GOP) is pursuing the TransPacific Partnership (TPP), a so-called free trade agreement with eleven nations including Japan. TPP has been described as NAFTA on steroids, and the president says he wants to conclude it this year.
Under the banner of global free trade, Congress would forfeit its power to craft a national energy policy that serves the best interests of all our citizens, rather than the narrow interests of international bankers and the Seven Sisters.
I would argue that a maximum export policy relegates the U.S. to the status of a captive colonial market for manufactured goods from Asia.
Reasonable people can disagree. But one thing is certain: The decision whether to export and how much to export should be made in America, by Americans, not by unaccountable transnational authorities beyond the reach of our elected representatives.
Obama’s Contempt for the White Working Class Is as Strong as Ever
By JIM GERAGHTY
December 1, 2016 10:21 PM
The president never understood those who disagreed with him, and never really tried to.In 2015, Obama suggested Fox News makes the American public seethe with resentment against poor people:
I think that the effort to suggest that the poor are sponges, leeches, don’t want to work, are lazy, are undeserving, got traction. And look, it’s still being propagated. I have to say that if you watch Fox News on a regular basis, it is a constant venue. . . . We’re going to have to change how our body politic thinks, which means we’re going to have to change how the media reports on these issues.
Contemplate what President Obama must think about working-class white voters to conclude that their vote was determined, or at least significantly influenced, by what was on the television in their favorite bars and restaurants. It implies that if Rachel Maddow had been playing above the pool table or Golden Tee cabinet, Hillary Clinton and Congressional Democrats would have cruised to victory. What kind of fools does he take these voters for? Drones? Zombies? Empty-headed hicks, hypnotized en masse by Bill O’Reilly?
For all of his alleged great insight and empathy, Obama never understood, and never really cared enough to understand, his critics. Contempt and condescension were not difficult to sense. In 2008, he famously described rural and Midwestern working-class voters as “cling[ing] to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment” because they were “bitter.”
spacer
s
Liberals brag about having won the hearts and minds of America, as if, through logic and argument, they’ve persuaded people to accept their bankrupt European socialist ideas. Democrats haven’t changed anyone’s mind. They changed the people.
More white people voted for Mitt Romney this year than voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. Barack Obama lost white voters by 20 points — the widest margin since 1984.
But in 1980, whites were 88% of the electorate. In 2012, they were 72%. Not only that, but the nonwhite electorate is far more Democratic than it was in 1980. If the same country that voted in 1980 had voted in 2012, Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did.
Most Americans don’t realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the U.S. into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!
Under Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, according to “Alien Nation” author Peter Brimelow, 85% of legal immigrants have come from what are euphemistically called “developing countries.”
spacer
Just when the furor over the socialist sentiments in President Obama???s ???you didn???t build that??? speech seemed to subside, Paul Ryan has charismatically and cogently revived the issue in his newly-minted VP candidacy, thus rightfully keeping the issue alive as we approach the election. But even Ryan, as articulate as he is, is omitting the underlying point. And that point is that not only does Obama have socialist thoughts???but he is also a Third World thinker.
While some critics may hurl any accusation at Obama without any rhyme or reason, my assertion that he is a Third World thinker is based on my unapologetic patriotism for America and my own immigrant experience. As a naturalized American who grew up in the Third World, I saw firsthand the shenanigans that Third World leaders (who should at best be called misleaders) used on their people.
Consequently, I am much more concerned about preserving America???s greatness than about conforming to the mindless mantra among many minorities that this president is a great leader. He is not. I came to America when Ronald Reagan was president. He was a great leader. And he was a president who was unmistakably proud to be American???not a man who went around the world apologizing for America.
A mainstay in the propaganda of Third World leaders is the relentless assault on the wealthy??? and Obama is a master at that. In fact, many Third World leaders, despite being well-off themselves, are particularly adept at haranguing the public into thinking that wealth is an evil. And Obama, despite being a millionaire himself, is inimitably adept at public castigation of the wealthy.
In fact, Obama???s Third World socialist proclivities were evident even before he became president. Recall the famous ???Joe the Plumber??? moment during the 2008 campaign, when Obama declared that he wanted to ???spread the wealth around.??? That is what Third World dictators do???take things from people who earned them and give them to those who did not.
It behooves us to take a closer look at what else he said in the recent speech where he made the ???you didn???t build that??? remark. Here is what he said about those who believe their success is due to their own efforts: ???If you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. [Yes, he repeated it.] I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I [i.e., they] was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something???there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.???
Even a rabid communist in a Third World banana republic could not have done a more vehement denunciation of individual initiative than Obama did in that speech on July 13 at Roanoke, Va. As an immigrant who realized the American Dream with my own hard work, I am stunned by such anti-capitalist poppycock coming from an American president.
Such open contempt for the successful is a common occurrence in the Third World. That is why Third World countries are as destitute as they are???for along with such contempt comes disrespect for private property, and where private property is not respected, no private investment takes place. And without such investment, prosperity is impossible.
Obama apparently lacks even a rudimentary understanding of the role that individual initiative plays in American success stories. His canonization of government as the benefactor of progress is downright delusional. What government program helped Edison invent the light bulb? What program helped the Wright brothers launch the first flight? What program helped Henry Ford build his first car?
By Obama???s logic, almost anyone you ever came in contact with deserves credit for your success. Thus, in my case, it would begin with the pilot of the plane that brought me to America. And then the immigration officer who inspected me. Then the landlords I rented from. Then the banks that I borrowed from. And of course all the workers who built the roads and bridges that connected the towns and cities where I have done business. Oh, I forgot to mention the cashiers who bagged my food at the grocery stores. Oops, I also forgot to include the car salesmen who sold me the cars in which I commuted to work over the years. So, you see how ridiculous Obama???s logic is!
It is a fact of life that before you can expect someone to help you, you must help yourself first. You must demonstrate to others that you are a worthy risk???for a loan, job, etc. And when such conduct brings you success, you fully deserve it, because it was your conduct that made others willing to lend you money, employ you, or support your business.
Perhaps what is most disturbing about this whole affair is the affirmative response Obama has received in some corners. Many Americans are unabashed in their support for what he said. Of course, they are not a majority, but they are nevertheless a sizable portion of the public. That in itself is sufficient evidence of how Obama has managed to Third-Worldize the minds of many Americans.
spacer
Obama Resolutely Turning US into Third World Country
One-man and multi-Czar mission to turn the USA into–at least–a third world country
By Sher Zieve —— Bio and Archives—June 25, 2009
American Politics, News, Opinion | Disqus Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
On a one-man and multi-Czar mission to turn the USA into—at least—a third world country, Obama is in the process of taking over all major US industries—thus far, he’s commandeered the auto industry and banking. He is now going after the creme de la creme—healthcare and the attendant Insurance companies. ObamaControl of this industry will give him ultimate power over all of us.
During a recent speech to the American Medical Association (AMA), he said: ‚“What accounts for the bulk of our costs is the nature of the healthcare delivery system.” Translation: ‚“I don’t like this entire US system and plan to trash it.” He then said: ‚“We spend vast amounts of money on things that aren’t necessarily making people any healthier.” Translation: ‚“I know how to manage healthcare better than doctors. Besides, I not only want a piece of this action, I want it ALL!”